AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
longdayze
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:49 am
Location: Panama City Florida

AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby longdayze » Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:53 pm

I had one of the top implant surgeons tell me he prefers the AMS over the Coloplast. How about a response from those who have each, the good and the bad. I have to make a decision on which to go with and would like to know those who have each implants opinion.
Thanks
SAM I AM
Had Titan 18cm + 1cm RTE on 1-5-17, blotched surgery, cylinders short. Had revision on 3-15-17 Dr. Kramer to a Titan 22 +1 RTE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiEZyTjSM2M

Sam

charlesr
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby charlesr » Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:30 pm

From what I have read and heard, the Titan is harder in the hard state and the AMS is softer in the soft state. I have a Titan and I love it. A good and entertaining video to compare is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PPId-OVzag
Born 1951. Radical Robotic Prostatectomy on October 6, 2013. Bionic with Titan Touch with Bioflex Zero Degree 18cm w/ (1) rte Implant, Infrapubic, on July 13, 2015.

charlesr
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby charlesr » Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:34 pm

Dumb question: How can you make a decision if your bio says that you got implanted on January 5th?
Born 1951. Radical Robotic Prostatectomy on October 6, 2013. Bionic with Titan Touch with Bioflex Zero Degree 18cm w/ (1) rte Implant, Infrapubic, on July 13, 2015.

TANGERINE
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:10 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby TANGERINE » Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:07 am

The video posted above is a really excellent discussion, and is accurate as far as I can tell.

There is also a paper from Spain comparing Titan versus AMS cx.
In summary, partner satisfaction was nearly identical, with 92% of women responding that they would describe sexual intercourse after the implant as "very good" or "good". The data showed that there were some male complaints about deflation being slower and more difficult with the titan, but the overall satisfaction appears to be identical comparing the two devices. Across the board, for both implant models, there was some dissatisfaction with overall penile size post implant (this was a group implanted in Spain).

For me, so far, I feel that it is true that Titan is harder and thicker in the hard state, (reportedly, AMS is softer in the flacid state). But, not everyone pumps up their implant to the max everytime during sex, so the hardnesss and thickness of Titan might not be realized in all instances, and based on the similar female satisfaction reported in the study from Spain, maybe the Titan's extra girth does NOT really matter ??

Merrix gives a nice discussion in his journal regarding the debate on Titan versus AMS, and I tend to agree with him. My general sense is that Titans in the flacid state are kindave firm (my 2 week old titan is like that), and that does not bother me (I always wanted a big dick when flacid, and what the heck, I do not mind that it sometimes shows underneath my clothes)

MY BOTTOM LINE: either AMS or Coloplast are great devices, and female satisfaction and patient satisfaction is nearly identical.

My Philosophical line: be happy with what you have and embrace the advantages of what you have (I do that with my car and house as well) and do not dwell on what could have been; it looks like the differences are subtle.

I will paste the abstract from the article from spain shortly
"Strive to find the best surgeon--experience really matters"
(63 yo, Titan 22cm implant Feb 2017 by Dr Eid) I'm super pleased with my length/girth/implant performance. See my story at "The road to becoming a bionic male: Answers ..."

TANGERINE
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:10 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby TANGERINE » Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:09 am

Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses
Date of Web Publication 22-Jan-2016
Asian Journal of Andrology
Javier Romero Otero,
12 de Octubre University Hospital, Department of Urology, Madrid, Spain

Abstract
Most widespread three-component penile prosthesis models are 700CX™ and Titan ® . Our purpose is to assess patient and partner satisfaction after the first implant. This is a multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study in which all patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2013 were included. In total, 248 patients agreed to participate. To evaluate patient satisfaction, a validated but modified 11-question questionnaire was completed (EDITS); and a nonvalidated two-item questionnaire was given to the partner. Statistical analysis used an ordinal logistic regression model. Two hundred and forty-eight patients (194 with 700CX™ vs 54 with Titan ® ) and 207 couples completed the questionnaire (165 with 700CX™ vs 42 with Titan ® ). Overall satisfaction was high. Both showed great reliability for sexual intercourse and high compliance with prior expectations. Most patients were able to manage the penile prosthesis correctly within 6 months. Postoperative penile shortening led to some dissatisfaction in 42% and 46% of cases (700CX™ /Titan ® ). Significant differences were found in three questions of patients' questionnaire. There were more patients satisfied with the 700CX™ (P = 0.0001). No patient with Titan ® implant took longer than 6 months to optimal management. Only 4% of patients with 700CX™ implant were dissatisfied with the deflation, in contrast to 24% with the Titan ® (P = 0.0031). Of the two partners' questions, one showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0026). It seems that group 700CX™ would recommend to re-implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency. The overall satisfaction was very high for both prostheses. The final aspect of the erected and flaccid penis was satisfactory, but both groups showed significant discontent with its final size. Partners' overall satisfaction was high.
"Strive to find the best surgeon--experience really matters"
(63 yo, Titan 22cm implant Feb 2017 by Dr Eid) I'm super pleased with my length/girth/implant performance. See my story at "The road to becoming a bionic male: Answers ..."

DaveET1

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby DaveET1 » Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:09 am

I am 79, obese, and had a turtle. I got a Titan on Feb. 3, so I haven't gotten to use it yet, but I'll tell you what I know so far.

The length and circumference of the Titan are AWESOME!. The boner left after surgery is bigger and better than any erection I've seen in 50 years. When Dr. Caesar inflates it fully on Mar. 8, I'm going to need a lion tamer to control it. If it's a bit cumbersome when deflated, why on earth would I complain?

As of right now, I can look at my penis instead of looking for it like I used to.

Dave

longdayze
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:49 am
Location: Panama City Florida

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby longdayze » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:39 am

Charles, I read your comment, yes I was implanted on Jan. 5th 2017. Problem is a terrible results, cylinders are to short, a loss of 5cm in length, floppy head and the tips are not even. When I pump to the max one cylinder tip, the one to the right protrudes and only extends to the bottom of my penis head. It is also painful when I pump to the max, but I've continued to do so in fear of never gaining back the loss length. I went to the surgeon who performed this blotch, he said just take Viagra to help with the floppy head. He basically feels if the shaft is hard, his job is done. I called Coloplast and explained the situation and asked if they would help in a revision for my issues. I felt they had responsibility as they had the doctor listed as a center of excellence. They agree to waive the fee for another Titan, which I felt was fair.
The reason I ask the question, when I sent pictures to a doctor for revision, he said he would use only a AMS LGX. He said he could offer another doctor who would use the Titian and I could save the 12/K out of pocket. I explained to him, I'm willing to do what is best to fix the issues. As I told him, I herd an IPP would change my life forever, I just thought the change would be good. Not everyone gets great results, and I fear many never post so those who are contemplating surgery can read the good and the bad.
And Charles, thanks for picking up that I had surgery, I will change my signature toiday.
Sam I AM
Had Titan 18cm + 1cm RTE on 1-5-17, blotched surgery, cylinders short. Had revision on 3-15-17 Dr. Kramer to a Titan 22 +1 RTE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiEZyTjSM2M

Sam

strongagain
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 11:17 am

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby strongagain » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:57 am

longdayze wrote:Charles, I read your comment, yes I was implanted on Jan. 5th 2017. Problem is a terrible results, cylinders are to short, a loss of 5cm in length, floppy head and the tips are not even. When I pump to the max one cylinder tip, the one to the right protrudes and only extends to the bottom of my penis head.
Sam I AM


That's terrible, I feel extremely sorry for you. It would really help if you give us the name of the surgeon. Without that your information has much less value as far as I'm concerned.
Born in 1950, ED since 2007 (colon cancer)
08/2015 Titan Zero Degree 22 cm + 3 cm RTE
Dr. Leiber, Freiburg, Germany
6.5" x 5.7" - Very happy with implant

Living in Freiburg, Germany

charlesr
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby charlesr » Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:26 pm

Got it. Thanks for the clarification and sorry about your situation. In light of this, I would overwhelmingly go with the model (AMS or Titan) in which the urologist/surgeon is the most familiar/comfortable/competent. My urologist would only do a Titan and infrapubic and I was totally in agreement. (Especially since I knew nothing about implants and their procedures; and thought the name "Titan" sounded cool.) In retrospect I am extremely glad that I went with his choices, as my operation could not have turned out better. Forcing a urologist into another brand/model/technique (infrapubic v.penoscrotal) would be a mistake; as would be dictating a variation in the type of tools that they were using.
Born 1951. Radical Robotic Prostatectomy on October 6, 2013. Bionic with Titan Touch with Bioflex Zero Degree 18cm w/ (1) rte Implant, Infrapubic, on July 13, 2015.

Lost Sheep
Posts: 6147
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby Lost Sheep » Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:39 pm

Can anyone address the question of service life of the implant?

If the difference in longevity is large, it could help me avoid revision. An implant that is likely to outlive me would take a load off my mind.

Lost Sheep
Last edited by Lost Sheep on Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 146 guests