Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Mark1974
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 5:16 pm

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby Mark1974 » Thu Apr 25, 2024 7:59 am

wolfpacker wrote:
younggun1 wrote:
wolfpacker wrote:
I'm definitely happy with it yes. But I know I'm just one bad infection away from having a drastically smaller or non-functional penis permanently. It's important to understand this risk.

And yes the implant is superior to mediocre sex with a weak erection. But the weak erection is far superior to what your penis will be like if they have to remove and not reinstall an implant due to infection.


That's fair to weigh that risk but isn't that a small likelihood? 1-2% infection rate and then aren't most infections able to be salvaged? Doesn't seem like size loss is a guarantee.

Have you heard of cases where functionality is wiped out? I guess I always chalked it up as low odds and the upside being worth it but yeah definitely good to think everything through.



Yes, at least one guy in the past week. His username is RollTide, he had a Titan removed due to infection and is now told that a malleable cannot be installed due to scarring. He is left with no erectile capacity whatsoever now. There have been others over the years with similar stories.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24323
Yes Ive been here since 2020 and I've read a number of stories where a malleable wasn't even possible due to scar tissue from the IPP surgery
I was born in 1974. I've had venous leak ED since early 30's, but managed with pde5 inhibitors until mid 40's. I have fairly severe hour-glassing, but no hard plaques. My urologist is worldwide acknowledged expert Dr. Laurence Levine

Never_Enough
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2023 7:54 am

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby Never_Enough » Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:35 pm

How common is this amongst good high volume surgeons?
38 m UK

Psychogenic ED since a teenager, no problems being fully erect alone.
2 kids, long term partner but also a new relationship.
Chronic pelvic pain developed in late 2023 making ED worse.
Extreme stress levels
Cialis 5 mg daily and 15 mg as prn

Never_Enough
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2023 7:54 am

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby Never_Enough » Thu Apr 25, 2024 12:37 pm

wolfpacker wrote:
younggun1 wrote:
wolfpacker wrote:
I'm definitely happy with it yes. But I know I'm just one bad infection away from having a drastically smaller or non-functional penis permanently. It's important to understand this risk.

And yes the implant is superior to mediocre sex with a weak erection. But the weak erection is far superior to what your penis will be like if they have to remove and not reinstall an implant due to infection.


That's fair to weigh that risk but isn't that a small likelihood? 1-2% infection rate and then aren't most infections able to be salvaged? Doesn't seem like size loss is a guarantee.

Have you heard of cases where functionality is wiped out? I guess I always chalked it up as low odds and the upside being worth it but yeah definitely good to think everything through.



Yes, at least one guy in the past week. His username is RollTide, he had a Titan removed due to infection and is now told that a malleable cannot be installed due to scarring. He is left with no erectile capacity whatsoever now. There have been others over the years with similar stories.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24323



Are there other factors here though?

Such at your age infection being less likely.. And less risky multiple surgeries?

We really need a mide ground ED treatment that's more reliable than pills and injections but less irreversible than implants.
38 m UK

Psychogenic ED since a teenager, no problems being fully erect alone.
2 kids, long term partner but also a new relationship.
Chronic pelvic pain developed in late 2023 making ED worse.
Extreme stress levels
Cialis 5 mg daily and 15 mg as prn

younggun1
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2023 11:58 pm

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby younggun1 » Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:01 pm

wolfpacker wrote:
younggun1 wrote:
wolfpacker wrote:
I'm definitely happy with it yes. But I know I'm just one bad infection away from having a drastically smaller or non-functional penis permanently. It's important to understand this risk.

And yes the implant is superior to mediocre sex with a weak erection. But the weak erection is far superior to what your penis will be like if they have to remove and not reinstall an implant due to infection.


That's fair to weigh that risk but isn't that a small likelihood? 1-2% infection rate and then aren't most infections able to be salvaged? Doesn't seem like size loss is a guarantee.

Have you heard of cases where functionality is wiped out? I guess I always chalked it up as low odds and the upside being worth it but yeah definitely good to think everything through.



Yes, at least one guy in the past week. His username is RollTide, he had a Titan removed due to infection and is now told that a malleable cannot be installed due to scarring. He is left with no erectile capacity whatsoever now. There have been others over the years with similar stories.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24323


Isn't this extremely rare? Also it looks like he neglected to go back to the doctor to fill the space after infection. I also wonder why the doctor wasn't able to put the malleable in sooner after the infection.

I could also get hit by a car when I cross the street. That doesn't mean I should stay in the house permanently.

I'm curious why implant doctors say they haven't had patients be end of the road - Eid, Clavell if this is such a possibility.

This seems like a big outlier but please tell me if I'm wrong. I would like to understand the data around infection aftermath more.
32. Austin, Texas.

younggun1
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2023 11:58 pm

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby younggun1 » Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:05 pm

That is very unfortunate though that he's implantless now.

Clavell made it seem like we can always get you back.
32. Austin, Texas.

CigareVolant
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed May 25, 2022 6:13 pm

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby CigareVolant » Thu Apr 25, 2024 5:03 pm

LastHope wrote:Finally, after his eighth revision, Bon made a decision. He realized that while IPP might not have worked for him, there were plenty of other things in life worth smiling about. ... Now comes the twist, Bon finally got his Malleable and reunited with his girlfriend, they happy lived and made love everyday, ever after!


I'm very curious what went wrong with eight IPP surgeries that failed where a malleable succeeded. Did the hardware keep failing? Did the hardware work but there was pain or something else that went wrong?

I'm so happy that the malleable worked for you.
Implanted June, 2022 by Dr. Karpman. 22cm Titan with 1.5cm RTE.

Mark1974
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 5:16 pm

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby Mark1974 » Thu Apr 25, 2024 6:31 pm

CigareVolant wrote:
LastHope wrote:Finally, after his eighth revision, Bon made a decision. He realized that while IPP might not have worked for him, there were plenty of other things in life worth smiling about. ... Now comes the twist, Bon finally got his Malleable and reunited with his girlfriend, they happy lived and made love everyday, ever after!


I'm very curious what went wrong with eight IPP surgeries that failed where a malleable succeeded. Did the hardware keep failing? Did the hardware work but there was pain or something else that went wrong?

I'm so happy that the malleable worked for you.

I think it was a hypothetical story, but it closely resembles another poster's story who had 3 failed IPP's and is happy with his decision to get a malleable
I was born in 1974. I've had venous leak ED since early 30's, but managed with pde5 inhibitors until mid 40's. I have fairly severe hour-glassing, but no hard plaques. My urologist is worldwide acknowledged expert Dr. Laurence Levine

oldbeek
Posts: 2474
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 1:46 pm
Location: Los Angeles area

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby oldbeek » Thu Apr 25, 2024 8:13 pm

NOTHING is better than a natural blood filled dick. Even if it only works 70% of the time.
82, good health, RP 7-2017, all nerves taken , PSA 0.05, 4-18,, .07 1/19,.05 4/19, .03 11-21, .04 11-23, implanted 4-1-18, Infra-pubic, AMS lgx 15 cm with 5cm rte. Implant at USC Keck. Dr Boyd and Dr Loh Doyle 6.5 x 5, 800 AUS 7-21-20

Surfshack
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon May 17, 2021 10:31 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby Surfshack » Sat May 04, 2024 10:49 am

oldbeek wrote:NOTHING is better than a natural blood filled dick. Even if it only works 70% of the time.


Dude you always say that. :lol:
55 yrs old. Prostiva procedure (enlarged prostate surgery) June 2019. Also hard flaccid issues. Working thru it (massage/yoga/exercise) and getting better and more mentally positive. Still experiencing ED, hate pills but i'm gonna figure out a way.

Txagq8
Posts: 719
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 4:41 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Re: Why is there such a negative view of implants outside of the Internet?

Postby Txagq8 » Sat May 04, 2024 11:38 am

Surfshack wrote:
oldbeek wrote:NOTHING is better than a natural blood filled dick. Even if it only works 70% of the time.


Dude you always say that. :lol:



Yes, he does.

And even though it annoys the hell outta me I am a free speech absolutist and spent 23 years playing Army for a living so that he has the right to say it.

Why does it bother me? Because some of us have no clue what it’s like to have a sustained blood filled dick without chemical/pharmaceutical assistance accompanied by superhuman efforts to keep up the stimulation.

I was, I guess, 31 when I had the pressure studies and dye tests done. That would have been around 1987.

Hell, after 37 years I don’t even remember that urologist’s name. I do remember being pretty down about not being “a normal man.” He did tell me that it was just a guess but my problem didn’t appear to him to have been trauma or an accident, I was probably just born with veins that didn’t get squeezed off enough to maintain an erection. I had plenty of blood flow in. It just leaked out about as fast as I could pump it in unless I was flat on my back, perfectly still, with my left hand compressing the pubic mound. Then I could sustain a moderate erection for 4-5 minutes. Otherwise 30-45 seconds and bye bye boner.

So if I sometimes come across as an implant cheerleader it’s due to personal experience. You cannot miss that which you gave never had. It’s true that my LGX has left me slightly less girthy (about 3/8ths of an inch) but I don’t give a shit about that.

So, for a slightly different opinion: yes, there are things far better than a blood filled dick. A dick that works tops my list.
Robust, adolescent 65 year old. Venous leakage forever. Used shots, shots+pills 30+ years. Married to same wife ~35 yrs. Implanted 31Dec2019 in Austin Tx. AMS 700 LGX 18 cm with 5 cm RTE.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], james4326, Someguy90 and 84 guests