Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Mark1974
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 5:16 pm

Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Mark1974 » Mon Jan 22, 2024 1:35 pm

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443- ... y%20reason.

Anecdotal remarks from the implanting physicians who have experience with a variety of competitive MPPs, indicated that compared to its competitors, the best features of Rigi10™ MPP were that the supple bending capacity of its rods simplifies implantation through a smaller corporotomy and the availability of extra widths of cylinders facilitates more accurate penile girth attainment. Support for this opinion comes from (Table 3) which indicates that the size 12 mm cylinder, which is unavailable in competitive devices, was the second most used cylinder width in this Rigi10 study.
I was born in 1974. I've had venous leak ED since early 30's, but managed with pde5 inhibitors until mid 40's. I have fairly severe hour-glassing, but no hard plaques. My urologist is worldwide acknowledged expert Dr. Laurence Levine

Flexwheeler
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:56 am

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Flexwheeler » Tue Jan 23, 2024 12:52 am

I wonder if the flaccid appearance is more like AMS or Titan.

fucked0ne
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:47 pm

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby fucked0ne » Tue Jan 23, 2024 1:10 am

Seems to be the best option as far as malleables go. I'm considering one myself.

Gt1956
Posts: 2893
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2019 2:47 pm

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Gt1956 » Tue Jan 23, 2024 3:43 am

The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.
68yo, HBP at 40, high triglycerides at 45. Phimosis at 57. Type 2 at 60. Dr. William Brant May 1, 2023 CX 21cm w/no rte's penoscrotal 6" girth @ 6 months

frank66665
Posts: 1273
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:18 am

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby frank66665 » Tue Jan 23, 2024 4:29 am

What do you think about rigi10 with fillers to increase the girth and make it like a 3 piece inflatable?
56, ED since 2010, pills work but not always and well, trt in progress improved but not so much, myocardial infarction january 2016, new stent september 2016, hypertension, venous on 1/23/23 titan one touch 22, no rte dottor Gabriele Antonini Italia

User avatar
thedriver
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:56 am

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby thedriver » Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:37 am

Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.


Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years
After 4 Titan IPP failures within 4 years I finally wised up and went to the Malleable Genesis 23cm- 13mm implanted 2-1-24 and no regrets so far.
For those that are asking, I'm going to change the wifeys avatar weekly.

Flexwheeler
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:56 am

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Flexwheeler » Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:28 am

thedriver wrote:
Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.


Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years


A brother made a thread about the Rigicon malleable. He was not happy at all because of concealment issues. Even after a year in On the other hand he posted a pic of his penis and it was not thin at all.
If you add "rigicon" in the search button you will come across the thread.

Mark1974
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 5:16 pm

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Mark1974 » Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:35 am

Flexwheeler wrote:
thedriver wrote:
Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.


Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years


A brother made a thread about the Rigicon malleable. He was not happy at all because of concealment issues. Even after a year in On the other hand he posted a pic of his penis and it was not thin at all.
If you add "rigicon" in the search button you will come across the thread.
The corporotomy made for a malleable is bigger, but it's possible that more residual cavernosal tissue remains because it isn't constantly being compressed by the expansion of hydraulic cylinders

He probably also had 13mm rods, but I wouldn't go beyond 11mm because of erosion issues and may even go 10. If girth kills me psychologically and makes me totally unacceptable to women I will use funds reserved for retirement to get Uro or Phallo-fill, but I hate to do it

And, yes, concealment is an issue with any malleable, even a Rigicon. But concealment is somewhat of an issue with a TItan as well
I was born in 1974. I've had venous leak ED since early 30's, but managed with pde5 inhibitors until mid 40's. I have fairly severe hour-glassing, but no hard plaques. My urologist is worldwide acknowledged expert Dr. Laurence Levine

Mark1974
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 5:16 pm

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Mark1974 » Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:41 am

frank66665 wrote:What do you think about rigi10 with fillers to increase the girth and make it like a 3 piece inflatable?

I don't think you will get the same girth as a 3-piece, but you can definitely improve girth. You can also fill out your penis so that the rods are imperceptible to the touch
I was born in 1974. I've had venous leak ED since early 30's, but managed with pde5 inhibitors until mid 40's. I have fairly severe hour-glassing, but no hard plaques. My urologist is worldwide acknowledged expert Dr. Laurence Levine

Flexwheeler
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 6:56 am

Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study

Postby Flexwheeler » Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:54 am

Mark1974 wrote:


And, yes, concealment is an issue with any malleable, even a Rigicon. But concealment is somewhat of an issue with a TItan as well


Yes, that's why I go for AMS IPP


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GoNavy and 107 guests