If you wonder why a surgeon would have a preference for one brand over another, here is why.
Based on Open Payments data for the period of 2018–2024, here is how much each surgeon has taken from Coloplast (Colo), Boston Scientific (BS), or Rigicon (Rigi):
Paul Perito: $3.8M (Colo) | $67k (BS)
Steven K. Wilson: $1.1M (Colo) | $230k (Rigi)
Brian S. Christine: $304k (BS) | $25k (Colo)
Jonathan Clavell: $230k (Colo) | $152k (BS)
Alex Tatem: $220k (BS) | $16k (Colo)
Tariq Hakky: $203k (Colo)
Andrew Kramer: $78k (BS) | $43k (Rigi) | $12k (Colo)
https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/
"Consultation fees"
-
cbinspok
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 7:45 pm
Re: "Consultation fees"
you really can leave this site, you ware a thin vale
71 years now,Ed twenty years. A sever break to penis, vit E, pataba, Viagra, massage Ved cilas, exhausted, I tossed in my towel, Op for implant Mar 18, 2021 AMS LGX 18 x12 + 1 3cm RTE,yep standard size, happily gained girth and length,.. stay hwp!
-
GoodWood
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:07 pm
Re: "Consultation fees"
The CMS data you cited shows a correlation, but it does not prove causation. You’ve implied that compensation dictates Dr. A’s choice, ignoring the more logical explanation: he likely uses the product because he finds it superior, and the financial data simply reflects that high volume of use.
To suggest that medical professionals make life-altering decisions for their patients based on greed is a reach. It’s also curious that a 'new' user is already performing this level of technical research on CMS.gov for only their second post. It gives the impression that you are well-acquainted with these boards—perhaps from a previous account—and are simply continuing an old argument under a new name.
To suggest that medical professionals make life-altering decisions for their patients based on greed is a reach. It’s also curious that a 'new' user is already performing this level of technical research on CMS.gov for only their second post. It gives the impression that you are well-acquainted with these boards—perhaps from a previous account—and are simply continuing an old argument under a new name.
57yo, NYC. ED started at 40. Pills, then shots for 10 years. 24cm Coloplast Titan XL w/classic pump by Dr Eid 3/25/2025. Will meet for show & tell.
Implant journal: [url] viewtopic.php?f=6&t=26225[/url]
Implant journal: [url] viewtopic.php?f=6&t=26225[/url]
-
1sfman
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2025 9:12 am
- Location: Central Illinois
Re: "Consultation fees"
Spot on GoodWood!
75 YO (1951). Happily married since 1972 (A couple since 1968). ED since age 60. Viagra, then Cialis, Trimix & Quadmix, VED. AMS 700 with 21cm CX (+ 1cm RTE left side) implanted using Infrapubic procedure Jan 21, 2026.
-
whatevery
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2025 3:10 pm
Re: "Consultation fees"
I do want to add something to this.
I live in Boston, home of of Boston Scientific (surprise surprise). At this point I'm still in the process of doctor shopping so I see and virtually speak to many doctors. There are patterns.
It seems like most surgeons in Massachusetts again, home of Boston Scientific, prefer AMS-700. I'm yet to find a urologist that works in one of the local hospitals (besides the VA) that would implant anything other than AMS. Granted they're not high volume famous ones but still.
Kramer who used to prefer Coloplast when he was in Maryland, now since he moved to Mass, prefers AMS-700. He still would implant Coloplast if asked but still.
Most doctors outside of Mass seem to prefer Coloplast.
Is it a coincidence? I don't think so. The goto reasons for preferring one brand over another can be ignored imo. You know, Coloplast is more rigid, while AMS-700 is safer infection wise. I think of them as nothing more than excuses. AMS-700 CX is very rigid while Titan is more than sufficiently infection proof. LGX is a separate matter but its main focus is different from the other two.
I tend to think that main reasons are incentives. Do I have proof? No. I just don't believe in coincidences much.
I live in Boston, home of of Boston Scientific (surprise surprise). At this point I'm still in the process of doctor shopping so I see and virtually speak to many doctors. There are patterns.
It seems like most surgeons in Massachusetts again, home of Boston Scientific, prefer AMS-700. I'm yet to find a urologist that works in one of the local hospitals (besides the VA) that would implant anything other than AMS. Granted they're not high volume famous ones but still.
Kramer who used to prefer Coloplast when he was in Maryland, now since he moved to Mass, prefers AMS-700. He still would implant Coloplast if asked but still.
Most doctors outside of Mass seem to prefer Coloplast.
Is it a coincidence? I don't think so. The goto reasons for preferring one brand over another can be ignored imo. You know, Coloplast is more rigid, while AMS-700 is safer infection wise. I think of them as nothing more than excuses. AMS-700 CX is very rigid while Titan is more than sufficiently infection proof. LGX is a separate matter but its main focus is different from the other two.
I tend to think that main reasons are incentives. Do I have proof? No. I just don't believe in coincidences much.
64 yrs old.
atrophied to 4" erect.
ED since about 2000.
Edex but moving to Trimix.
Implant doctor shopping now.
atrophied to 4" erect.
ED since about 2000.
Edex but moving to Trimix.
Implant doctor shopping now.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bytespider, Google [Bot], Humpback, TikTokSpider and 119 guests
