Length Outcome Theory

[edjohn]

Maybe it’s too simple to call a theory, but what about this… what if the difference we see in length outcomes comes down to the difference in how much the CC wants to stretch vs how much the crus does?

If the CC is naturally pliable in an individual, he sees drastic length gains (measurable), and if the crus (i.e. anchor point of the CC) is pliable, he sees little length gain despite vigorous cycling?

Surgeons will say “most guys see .5 to 2cm gain on revision” but if the crus has been pushed deeper, this doesn’t mean they get a massively longer penis in practice.

I though of this because sometimes I notice pain in the perineum without any in the glans upon cycling… anybody experienced this?