Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:36 pm
Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
I am debating the idea of getting a revision to my implant from the Cx I currently have to an lgx and hopefully get the size from the 19cm I currently have to maybe the 21cm I had prior to the infection I had last year. I would also get a procedure to remove the fat pad and some of the scar tissue around the base that was caused by the many procedures. My question is it worth it to risk another infection and try to regain my lost length or should I just be content that it is functioning . If you search my previous posts you can see my story.
39 01/24/19 USC Dr Doumanian LGX 15cm 3, lGX 18 +2, revision 6-20 18+3 pump failure, revision 8-20 left cylinder in scrotum, 1-21 removed infection switched to dr Doyle, Boyd 10.05.21 a 15+3 cx,revision 01,23,24 with switch to LGX 15+6 fat pad removal.
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
Please does anyone have any opinion .
39 01/24/19 USC Dr Doumanian LGX 15cm 3, lGX 18 +2, revision 6-20 18+3 pump failure, revision 8-20 left cylinder in scrotum, 1-21 removed infection switched to dr Doyle, Boyd 10.05.21 a 15+3 cx,revision 01,23,24 with switch to LGX 15+6 fat pad removal.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2017 7:12 am
Re: Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
Mate, answer is very clear i think.
If you and your partner(s) are enjoying the sex, if it is working properly, if you dont have pain/discomfort/major aesthetic flaw, do not have surgery. 2 cm is nothing. You will have to have a revision eventually, save money for that and go for a world class surgeon then make him place the most appropriate size (not the biggest) implant, but only when your current implant fails, not now.
Best
If you and your partner(s) are enjoying the sex, if it is working properly, if you dont have pain/discomfort/major aesthetic flaw, do not have surgery. 2 cm is nothing. You will have to have a revision eventually, save money for that and go for a world class surgeon then make him place the most appropriate size (not the biggest) implant, but only when your current implant fails, not now.
Best
-
- Posts: 2875
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:31 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
If it isn't broke, don't fix it.
Nov. 8, 2019
5+ years, Coloplast Titan OTR
Married 37 years to my beautiful young bride
Always here to answer questions if you PM me
5+ years, Coloplast Titan OTR
Married 37 years to my beautiful young bride
Always here to answer questions if you PM me
-
- Posts: 1055
- Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:32 am
- Location: NW Arkansas
Re: Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
I don’t know of a surgeon on earth will will do a revision to increase size.Only if your implant has failed!
71 yrs.old married,ED for 7 yrs.Pills for 3 yrs,TriMix for 21/2 yrs.6 1/2 inches flacid,71/4 inches erect,6 inches girth.Coloplast Titan put in 11/13/20,Dr.Bozeman,Arkansas Urology,Little Rock.22cm + 2 RTE.
-
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2016 2:36 pm
Re: Is a revision worth the risk of infection again.
Thank you for your replies. The surgery would be to get rid of the fat pad which has a lot of scar tissue buildup from the previous surgeries along with going from the cx to the lgx since he is already working in there …..
It is working and the sex is great but I feel like even though she wouldn’t tell be but she would like the missing inch.
It is working and the sex is great but I feel like even though she wouldn’t tell be but she would like the missing inch.
39 01/24/19 USC Dr Doumanian LGX 15cm 3, lGX 18 +2, revision 6-20 18+3 pump failure, revision 8-20 left cylinder in scrotum, 1-21 removed infection switched to dr Doyle, Boyd 10.05.21 a 15+3 cx,revision 01,23,24 with switch to LGX 15+6 fat pad removal.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 59 guests