June 2025 - 16 MPP adverse events reported to FDA

[LastHope]

I can't think of a physiological reason why an IPP would enhance climax, though.

I thought the same. I have a few hunches though:

1) Will partial inflation to 75–80% have any positive effect?
2) Will the deflated state relax my nerves better compared to 24/7 stretching?
3) Will increased tunica stretch and girth provide more stimulation by rubbing more thoroughly inside the vagina?
4) Will additional surgery only make things worse? Something I don't want!

I'm just the opposite, I can orgasm 2 to 3 times through out a couple hour session with my MPP, I think I was over inflating when I had my IPP's, and found that if I only pumped to 80% I had much more feeling in my glans area and was able to orgasm then, now with the MPP there seems to be a much more natural feeling to everything and I actually have trouble holding back.
I know deflating a IPP just to get back some feeling in the glans area is sort of self defeating the purpose of the IPP, but if you can't orgasm, what's the point of it ?
I also find that it really matters what you might have laid out in front of you at the time,,,, I'm lucky to have a wifey that loves to lay around and tease me through out the day.

Thank you thedriver for your inputs! Your points make total sense. You're a lucky man.

[LastHope]

Attached.

June 2025 MPP adverse events reported to US FDA.

AMS Tactra - 10
AMS Spectra - 2
Coloplast Genesis - 4

Does this mean Rigi10 is “the safest bet” for MPP patients?

Even online searches show Rigi10 having the least amount of problems.

Rigicon doesn't report to MAUDE.

Which also shows how not all failures are reported on MAUDE.

Rigicon seems to have started reporting Rigi10 events after seeing your post. Thanks for bringing this up! I'm glad they are listening.

[tooyoung]

Anyone know why Rigicon does Rigicon does not report? I'm due to go back to my surgeon on the 15th and I'm going to ask him to declare my implant as failed due to it not bending properly. Anyone want to bet the pushback from the surgeon I'm going to get?

Commonly tactra or rgi10 don't bend..or even bend at all...even though companies and doctors claim otherwise..shit rigiCON even claims that it bends 130° (beyond the scrotum).. And still idealist carcasses here say "these devices are approved by the holy FDA".."in surgeon we trust"..."if you were right, lawyers would bankrupt these companies"..."you are a troll".

They don't know they are the trolls themselves for preventing any attempt of critical appraisal...and they will realize asslicking doesn't bring them any good.

Watch this comedy clip

https://youtu.be/CKMuMm4ZAok?si=7YRNQ5-FIZrSAM5A
(The surgeon is skilled though)

If companies and FDA say it bends , then it bends

What's strange though is that patients distrust their eyes and their own brain and keep reiterating what they have been told.

ASS LICKING CARCASSES ARE THE TROLLS

Anyway..If I were you , I wouldn't consider it as a failure as long as it penetrates well...and will adapt to its' subpar bending ability (if there's one at all)...undergoing another surgery isn't good as you know.

My tactra bends by itself ,and did so from day one .
in fact i need to hold it for it to stay up horizontal

Drops by itself*

[Thisworld]

I think this is relevant to the thread. I spotted on eduardo bertero website, under the voice -malleable disadvantages "Disadvantages include occasional difficulty in concealing it and the performance of transurethral endoscopic procedures that may require perineal urethrostomy." Can someone explain what that wuold mean? A malleable wuold increase chances of urethrostomy?

https://urologia-sp.com.br/protese-peni ... 37cea-815f

[tooyoung]

I think this is relevant to the thread. I spotted on eduardo bertero website, under the voice -malleable disadvantages "Disadvantages include occasional difficulty in concealing it and the performance of transurethral endoscopic procedures that may require perineal urethrostomy." Can someone explain what that wuold mean? A malleable wuold increase chances of urethrostomy?

https://urologia-sp.com.br/protese-peni ... 37cea-815f

With a malleable if you ever needed an evaluation via ureteroscopy/cystoscopy(god forbid), they would find it difficult to advance the endoscope as the malleable will be pressing from the sides (as with inflated ipp)...so they might turn into perineal urethrostomy for better access.

Strangely enough some high risk patient was advised to get a malleable instead of ipp even though he might need endoscopy in the future...the urologist claim is attached.

One of the malleable drawbacks for sure and should be considered in patients with high risk needing urethral endoscopic procedures in the future.However, ipp rediculous reliability still exists as well as higher risk of infection.

[Thisworld]

I think this is relevant to the thread. I spotted on eduardo bertero website, under the voice -malleable disadvantages "Disadvantages include occasional difficulty in concealing it and the performance of transurethral endoscopic procedures that may require perineal urethrostomy." Can someone explain what that wuold mean? A malleable wuold increase chances of urethrostomy?

https://urologia-sp.com.br/protese-peni ... 37cea-815f

With a malleable if you ever needed an evaluation via ureteroscopy/cystoscopy(god forbid), they would find it difficult to advance the endoscope as the malleable will be pressing from the sides (as with inflated ipp)...so they might turn into perineal urethrostomy for better access.

Strangely enough some high risk patient was advised to get a malleable instead of ipp even though he might need endoscopy in the future...the urologist claim is attached.

One of the malleable drawbacks for sure and should be considered in patients with high risk needing urethral endoscopic procedures in the future.However, ipp rediculous reliability still exists as well as higher risk of infection.

I may be wrong but it seems you are talking about diagnostic prodecure and evalution. I understand how it may be difficult accessing urethra with a malleable, but perineal urethrostomy isn't a permanent procedure where they deviate your urethral canal to the perineum?
It wouldn’t be done just to complete an endoscopic evaluation

[tooyoung]

I think this is relevant to the thread. I spotted on eduardo bertero website, under the voice -malleable disadvantages "Disadvantages include occasional difficulty in concealing it and the performance of transurethral endoscopic procedures that may require perineal urethrostomy." Can someone explain what that wuold mean? A malleable wuold increase chances of urethrostomy?

https://urologia-sp.com.br/protese-peni ... 37cea-815f

With a malleable if you ever needed an evaluation via ureteroscopy/cystoscopy(god forbid), they would find it difficult to advance the endoscope as the malleable will be pressing from the sides (as with inflated ipp)...so they might turn into perineal urethrostomy for better access.

Strangely enough some high risk patient was advised to get a malleable instead of ipp even though he might need endoscopy in the future...the urologist claim is attached.

One of the malleable drawbacks for sure and should be considered in patients with high risk needing urethral endoscopic procedures in the future.However, ipp rediculous reliability still exists as well as higher risk of infection.

I may be wrong but it seems you are talking about diagnostic prodecure and evalution. I understand how it may be difficult accessing urethra with a malleable, but perineal urethrostomy isn't a permanent procedure where they deviate your urethral canal to the perineum?
It wouldn’t be done just to complete an endoscopic evaluation

I'm not a urologist myself. I don't know what is the ideal next step in this scenario..whether they will do an explantation and proceed with an endoscope or create a bypass(e.g perineal)...I assumed that a bypass is considered since you have qouted eduardo bertero who is a renowed urologist in brazil.