sgarza07 wrote:Gt1956 wrote:Further evidence. You don't need to read all 333 pages of archived posts to get that info. A simple reading of the 25 threads on the front page of posts should answer most of them.
The FT membership answers several of them almost every day. Even IF a master post was to contain all that info. It would be lost amongst all the other posts only to have someone in a year or so to want a new master list.
Though such compilation could be pinned to the top of the post. I think this is a great idea.
Anything that is written in this compilation is likely to be obsolete fairly quickly IMHO. Btw, no mention of prostate cancer is in the list. The presence or lack of prostate cancer can severely change answers to the proposed questions. This is a major reason why the signature info is so darned important.
I see newer guys asking questions of cancer survivors that do not bear any revelence to the member asking the question. Gathering data from someone who's medical past isn't similar to yours is misleading at best.
Another point is the "size" question. I can't tell you how many members that NOW post that they got their size back or maybe a bit more that complained strongly the first few months that they lost size. Some of the ones that I'm thinking of are among the strongest supporters of implants now. You get all that info by READING. For this compilation to even be remotely accurate. The member shouldn't add to the post for a full year. If not, then all the "lost size" posts would become gospel & it would scare new members away. Does that help anyone?
