indeed wrote:I'm not saying that Clavell oversizes in general, i'm saying that he oversized me.
I'm sure of it for a few reasons.
1. In the operative report he measured my erect size longer than i've ever been, even with my best erections
2. I never even really cycled. After being implanted i've immediately been the same size as before
3. My distal tips go 3/4 into the glans, which might be fine for some, but for me the left tip is uncomfortable
4. He gave me a titan without even questioning my size / girth. I'm an international patient and he saw me like maxium 2 minutes before surgery. He did not ask for my girth in the consults, he just said a Titan is good for young guys.
I'm not even blaming him really as i don't have the best tissue quality, just stating the fact that he oversized me. A high volume surgeon should consider factors like tissue/ tunica quality and girth (Eid certainly does).
Idk why you rush to defend him when i didn't even really attack him.prguy3 wrote:Why do you say your surgeon oversized you? Many guys here would defer with your comment that Dr. Clavell oversizes. Just like me, You are young, and younger guys tend to have more "aggressive" sex and more "wear and tear". This is why I trust his judgement when he told me to be careful with being super aggressive with cycling. Additionally, if there is history of an injury and scar tissue formation, the tissues may be less healthy. Why is the surgeon to blame for that?
I apologize if my comment came out as rude and I certainly don't want to dismiss your concern nor did my intention was to "rush to defend him", but rather wanted to point out that tissue quality can have an impact in long-term outcomes which has nothing to do with what a surgeon did.
