Gt1956 wrote:Charlie2019 wrote:Gt1956 wrote:I'm sure you're right. The anticipation of the unknown usually exaggerates the actually event.
It's honestly so good that 31 months post op and I still stop and stare in the mirror at my package. I have secretly always liked looking at dicks but I am really impressed with mine. I just wish my wife's libido was at least 25% of what mine is. I seem to be horney all the time and I am lucky if I get it twice a month. Although I am not gay, I think I am a closet bi guy. Guys seem to be hornier than gals. How did you sleep last night? Did you listen to me and lighten up a bit?

I think it is generally accepted that the male of most species are more sexual than the females.
An interesting story. My wife, over her career, had worked at places that employed a lot of women. She claimed & I have no reason to doubt her. That generally the women complained about their boyfriend/husband not jumping them enough. I always wondered how that was possible. The men that I worked with told the exact same story with the genders reversed. How could this happen?
Economics.
Scarcity makes most items more valuable. Diamonds have little intrinsic value outside of industrial purposes. But they are expensive because of their rarity.
Sexual encounters are more highly valued when they are rare. If we got laid every day, we would put a lower value on the events.
Monopolies make more money if they limit their production. At 100 units a year (Ferraris, or what have you) a monopoly can charge a million dollars each. At a million a year, maybe $10 each. Restricted supply, total revenue is 100 million. Mass produced, ten million.
A monogamous relationship restricts the supply of sexual encounters for both parties, thus elevating the total value of the sex they have, even while reducing the amount of the sex. The amount of sex is less, but valued more...because both parties are HUNGRY for it.