Curiousity

Anything goes when it comes to ED.
Larry10625

Curiousity

Postby Larry10625 » Tue May 14, 2019 9:18 am

OK gang, for years now I have read conflicting reports regarding the correlation between the size of a mans hands, feet and penis. The most common I have seen is that there is no evidence that suggests that, if you have big hands you have a big penis BUT it further says that if you have big feet, you do have a big penis. So, it would be nice if everyone were to post here, the proper size of your penis and the size of your shoes and gloves. Of course if people were to lay down, lay a shoe on one leg beside their penis and a glove on the other leg and take a picture of the three, that would be great... if you do that, please posts the sizes as well. This could be educational and fun. I will go first :)

Shoe - 11.5
Dick - 5.5
Glove - large.

Don't forget that, according to ultrasound, I have between 7 and 9 cm of penis trapped in my pelvis due to 3 botched circumcisions.

Larry

Hunchback
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 5:00 am

Re: Curiousity

Postby Hunchback » Wed May 15, 2019 9:14 am

I have rather quite large hand and rather very small penis, so... yeah, it's all urban legends
39 years old, married. ED all my life because of spinal cord injury caused by a tumor in early infant age. Using standard EDEX20 since 2007. Increasingly bad results with EDEX in the last few years, but had very good results for at least 10 years.

Larry10625

Re: Curiousity

Postby Larry10625 » Wed May 15, 2019 10:16 am

Hunchback wrote:I have rather quite large hand and rather very small penis, so... yeah, it's all urban legends



No... the most credible, scientific study says that feet and penis are related. :)

Larry

Lost Sheep
Posts: 6133
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm

Re: Curiousity

Postby Lost Sheep » Wed May 15, 2019 2:01 pm

Larry10625 wrote:
Hunchback wrote:I have rather quite large hand and rather very small penis, so... yeah, it's all urban legends



No... the most credible, scientific study says that feet and penis are related. :)

Larry

Care to share the citation?

It does make sense that general humanoid proportionality would demand that large body parts on one part of a man's body suggest all parts be larger. But for that general proportionality to be useful as a predictor is a tremendous leap. To what end? Bar bets, perhaps?

I don't intend to be argumentative. Only a bit teasing.
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter

Larry10625

Re: Curiousity

Postby Larry10625 » Wed May 15, 2019 3:27 pm

Lost Sheep wrote:
Larry10625 wrote:
Hunchback wrote:I have rather quite large hand and rather very small penis, so... yeah, it's all urban legends



No... the most credible, scientific study says that feet and penis are related. :)

Larry

Care to share the citation?

It does make sense that general humanoid proportionality would demand that large body parts on one part of a man's body suggest all parts be larger. But for that general proportionality to be useful as a predictor is a tremendous leap. To what end? Bar bets, perhaps?

I don't intend to be argumentative. Only a bit teasing.



That's good sheep cause it was a long time ago that I saw it... I'll try to find it. :)

Larry

dtwarren1942
Posts: 1905
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:58 pm
Location: Jersey Shore

Re: Curiousity

Postby dtwarren1942 » Thu May 16, 2019 4:53 pm

Size 9 shoes and size large gloves. Penis was 4.5” (5.5” bone pressed). We should use bone pressed measurements to eliminate the various fat pad depths. Also, most reliable studies use bone pressed.

A 2002 study in the British Journal of Urology put it to rest when two urologists measured “the stretched penile length” of 104 men, ages 17 to 85, with shoe sizes 5½ to 13, and found no association between foot and penis size. ... It's not true, either, that hand or nose size correlates with penis size.Jul 26, 2016
Age 81
Diabetic
Pumping
Started Trimix injections 8/'11

FreddyFree
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:43 pm

Re: Curiousity

Postby FreddyFree » Thu May 16, 2019 6:51 pm

I’m 5’8” tall. Small glove size. Size 8.5(North American) shoe size. When I was 30, 8” dick.
AMS 700 CX 18cm. x 12mm. With 3cm. RTEs. 10/10/18

FreddyFree
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:43 pm

Re: Curiousity

Postby FreddyFree » Thu May 16, 2019 6:55 pm

Lost Sheep wrote:It does make sense that general humanoid proportionality would demand that large body parts on one part of a man's body suggest all parts be larger.

I played football with a Defensive Tackle who was 6’3” tall and weighed 260lbs. His nickname was “Tiny”. And he was.
AMS 700 CX 18cm. x 12mm. With 3cm. RTEs. 10/10/18

Woodicould
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:09 pm
Location: near Dallas, Texas

Re: Curiousity

Postby Woodicould » Thu May 16, 2019 10:14 pm

Is this flacid or erect?
Prostate cancer age 65 with PSA 5.8. Biopsy Oct 2010. Gleason score of 7, 3+4 with perineural invasion. Stage II, T2cNXMX.
Jan-Feb 2011 radiation. Palladium-103 seed implant March 2011 (55 implants). Lupron treatment from Dec 2010 to Aug 2011 (8 months).

FreddyFree
Posts: 587
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:43 pm

Re: Curiousity

Postby FreddyFree » Fri May 17, 2019 9:38 am

Woodicould wrote:Is this flacid or erect?

I don’t know who you’re asking.

For Tiny, I only saw his flaccid. It was the girls who nicknamed him.

For me, erect as a 30yr. old.
AMS 700 CX 18cm. x 12mm. With 3cm. RTEs. 10/10/18


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests