A different topic.

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
alibaba
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:04 pm

A different topic.

Postby alibaba » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:23 pm

Tonight I thought about reservoir sizes. I think they come in 60, 100, and 120 cc depending on brand and the size of your implant. Just because you have a certain size does not mean the doctor filled it to that amount. I have heard of filling less and even over filling. I pulled a 60 cc syringe off the shelf and compared. Thought y'all would find it interesting. Internal size of a 60cc is about 1" ( guessing) and about 5 1/2-6" long.
Attachments
IMG_0156.JPG
IMG_0156.JPG (26.11 KiB) Viewed 2314 times
IMG_0155.JPG
IMG_0155.JPG (36.25 KiB) Viewed 2314 times
LGX 21cm .Milam 01/13/16. Horror; both service and surgical outcome. hated infrapubic installation. Kramer revision 03/01/17. 22cm Titan +1.5cm extender. Those who think their opinion is the only one that matters are a danger to themselves and others.

Cnidium
Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:10 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby Cnidium » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:08 pm

Would there be any benefits to having an increased reservoir volume (without overfilling), regardless of your implant size? Could it help with rigidity, regaining lost size, tissue expansion? Just some thoughts.
Titan OTR. Dr. Hakky - successful surgery and very happy with outcome.
My advice: choose a world-class surgeon and make yourself the healthiest you can.

alibaba
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby alibaba » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:20 pm

No sense in a reservoir holding more than you can possibly pump in. Capacity for some stretching over time makes sense but percentage wise that surely cannot be much.
LGX 21cm .Milam 01/13/16. Horror; both service and surgical outcome. hated infrapubic installation. Kramer revision 03/01/17. 22cm Titan +1.5cm extender. Those who think their opinion is the only one that matters are a danger to themselves and others.

ThePlumber1964
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:03 pm
Location: Orlando, FL. USA

Re: A different topic.

Postby ThePlumber1964 » Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:14 am

Ali,

I think that at least for me, with a LGX 24cm, I want to have the reservoir filled to its fullest capacity. I always have been an extreme grower, so I want to have the peace of mind that I will have enough saline to streach it and go back to my pre op dimensions (7.25" L X 6.5" G) while maintaining the rigidity and the pointing angle.

Cheers!
54 years old, happily married for 30 years to a beautiful & outstanding lady. Onset ED at 49. Finally fixed on 11/08/2017 by the master Dr. Eid with a Titan XL 26, no RTEs! Previously had 3 AMS implants (LGX & CX), all botched.

David_R
Posts: 2145
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:03 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby David_R » Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:12 am

ThePlumber1964 wrote:I always have been an extreme grower

Before my prostatectomy and the E.D. problems I was a definite grower, more than doubling when going from soft to hard. Now with the implant I am a show-er, with the soft length being just an inch shorter than my hard length. Is this a bad change? Not for me! :D

Lost Sheep
Posts: 6144
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby Lost Sheep » Mon Apr 10, 2017 2:55 pm

With just a simple cylindrical calculation, I see that a 5" girth and 5.5" long penis is roughly

length x Pi * R squared or length x Pi x (girth/Pi/2) squared.

If calculating in inches, divide by 2.54 cubed to get cubic centimeters or milliliters

179.3 cc volume of inflated penis
36.7 cc volume of deflated penis
142.6 cc difference between inflated and deflated

That is a lot more than the reservoir sizes available, even allowing for the error produced by the cylinder assumption.

Could it be that some of the difference (between reservoir volume and penis volume change) might be spongiosum engorgement or residual corpus cavernosum engorement (if that is possible)
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter

ThePlumber1964
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:03 pm
Location: Orlando, FL. USA

Re: A different topic.

Postby ThePlumber1964 » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:18 pm

Definitely, with sexual stimulation, both the glans and the shaft gets engorgement. I can tell you that I can still experience sometimes kind of morning woods. Even with uninflated cylinders, I can definitely feel engorgement. Really enjoyable...
54 years old, happily married for 30 years to a beautiful & outstanding lady. Onset ED at 49. Finally fixed on 11/08/2017 by the master Dr. Eid with a Titan XL 26, no RTEs! Previously had 3 AMS implants (LGX & CX), all botched.

David_R
Posts: 2145
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 1:03 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby David_R » Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:48 pm

ThePlumber1964 wrote:I can tell you that I can still experience sometimes kind of morning woods.

I wake up with an engorged glans and a soft shaft. I call it my "morning wood-ette." ;)

alibaba
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby alibaba » Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:09 am

The cylinders inflated still likely do not account for more than 2/3 of the penis that is has no spongiform engorgement. In your volume calculations it would be more accurate I think to figure 2 cylinders of a diameter maxed out of .75" by say 6 or 7" long considering part is inside your body and there are solid tips on each end. In reality my picture probably has little relation to what is in your dick but the 60 cc's is the capacity of the small size reservoir.
LGX 21cm .Milam 01/13/16. Horror; both service and surgical outcome. hated infrapubic installation. Kramer revision 03/01/17. 22cm Titan +1.5cm extender. Those who think their opinion is the only one that matters are a danger to themselves and others.

Lost Sheep
Posts: 6144
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm

Re: A different topic.

Postby Lost Sheep » Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:37 am

alibaba wrote:The cylinders inflated still likely do not account for more than 2/3 of the penis that is has no spongiform engorgement. In your volume calculations it would be more accurate I think to figure 2 cylinders of a diameter maxed out of .75" by say 6 or 7" long considering part is inside your body and there are solid tips on each end. In reality my picture probably has little relation to what is in your dick but the 60 cc's is the capacity of the small size reservoir.

Yep, there are a number of unknowns and my thumbnail calculation leaves a lot out. But it does match your calculation within the broad strokes, I think.
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MiddleAgedMiami, owasso and 78 guests