Page 1 of 3

Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:17 pm
by JayGould
Is there anyone over 7 inches with implant? I see most examples are around 5 inches in length or shorter. Right now my erect length is 7 1/2, and it's very much a grower and not a shower. Can I expect to lose a lot of length?

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:11 pm
by ED2013
I have seen ppl on here with 7" plus. You should not lose any length if the procedure is done right. Usually a coloplast titan is used for longer penises. I highly recommend going with a top surgeon. I cannot stress this enough.

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:23 pm
by JayGould
ED2013 wrote:I have seen ppl on here with 7" plus. You should not lose any length if the procedure is done right. Usually a coloplast titan is used for longer penises. I highly recommend going with a top surgeon. I cannot stress this enough.


Cool. Yes, if I were to go ahead with it it would be with either Kramer or Eid for sure.

So flaccid length doesn't matter? I would bet I am less than 4 inches flaccid. The titan would basically make my flaccid the same as the erect (so around 7 inches)?

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 3:59 pm
by ccrider
JayGould wrote:Is there anyone over 7 inches with implant? I see most examples are around 5 inches in length or shorter. Right now my erect length is 7 1/2, and it's very much a grower and not a shower. Can I expect to lose a lot of length?


...you won't lose length if you're sized correctly by the right surgeon. I agree w/ ED2013...check w/ Kramer or Eid. Who you choose as your surgeon is critical. Per the posts on this board and my own personal experience, Kramer is the "gold standard"...talk to both of them and make your own decision.

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:26 pm
by ED2013
JayGould wrote:
ED2013 wrote:I have seen ppl on here with 7" plus. You should not lose any length if the procedure is done right. Usually a coloplast titan is used for longer penises. I highly recommend going with a top surgeon. I cannot stress this enough.


Cool. Yes, if I were to go ahead with it it would be with either Kramer or Eid for sure.

So flaccid length doesn't matter? I would bet I am less than 4 inches flaccid. The titan would basically make my flaccid the same as the erect (so around 7 inches)?



Correct. You'll be dealing with around 7" flaccid.

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:27 pm
by ED2013
Check out this topic... a guy with a long one.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=7411

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 7:40 pm
by merrix
Well, 6.9 is not over 7. But close enough to be of interest as an answer to your question I guess.
Flaccid is about an inch shorter.

And speaking of surgeon gold standard - that debate can and will go on forever. My vote is on Eid. I am sure Kramer is great as well, but it is a fact that during the last 15 months (i.e. my time on FT) there have been three cases (that I can remember) of him leaving his patients with a high pump causing dissatisfaction. During those same last 15 months I have not seen any case here with any issues from Eid. Not scientific conclusion drawing, but one fact-based point in that debate.

Since two of these three cases have been with an AMS (one I don't know which brand) - whether these pump issues are down to Kramer screwing up or the shortcomings with tubing insertion position of AMS - I don't know. But in a way it doesn't matter. The doc is responsible for choosing the implant. So choosing a model resulting in a high pump isn't a valid excuse. If one model is inferior - don't use it. If chosen, no excuses can be made.

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 8:22 pm
by oldgoat
I am way over 7". All you have to do is measure from your asshole. :lol: :roll:

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:21 pm
by JayGould
merrix wrote:Well, 6.9 is not over 7. But close enough to be of interest as an answer to your question I guess.
Flaccid is about an inch shorter.

And speaking of surgeon gold standard - that debate can and will go on forever. My vote is on Eid. I am sure Kramer is great as well, but it is a fact that during the last 15 months (i.e. my time on FT) there have been three cases (that I can remember) of him leaving his patients with a high pump causing dissatisfaction. During those same last 15 months I have not seen any case here with any issues from Eid. Not scientific conclusion drawing, but one fact-based point in that debate.

Since two of these three cases have been with an AMS (one I don't know which brand) - whether these pump issues are down to Kramer screwing up or the shortcomings with tubing insertion position of AMS - I don't know. But in a way it doesn't matter. The doc is responsible for choosing the implant. So choosing a model resulting in a high pump isn't a valid excuse. If one model is inferior - don't use it. If chosen, no excuses can be made.


Interesting, Merrix. May I ask what your length was before the implant? And how about the girth?

Re: Anyone over 7 inches with implant?

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2017 9:54 pm
by merrix
JayGould wrote:
Interesting, Merrix. May I ask what your length was before the implant? And how about the girth?


I think I am a rare case. I was 16.5 cm (6.5") before surgery. That's what I always was. From my teens till day before surgery. Girth was 14 cm (5.5").

Now I am 17-17.5 cm (6.7-6.9") and girth is 14.2-14.4 cm (5.6-5.7").
It seems to be a common understanding here on FT that one cannot get bigger than before. But I say I am.

And what I wonder in that case, is what about all those scientific papers claiming size increases from aggressive cycling protocols?
What about all the people here saying LGX is a good choice for length? If length gain is impossible, then the LGX is just a big fucking hoax then? If length gain is impossible, then those scientific papers are just fake?

What is it? Can length be gained or not?

I have a Titan, with cylinder tips going very, very close to the penis tip. Less than 1 cm. It also crinkles and buckles when deflated. Deflated it is about 2.5 cm (1") shorter than when erect and aroused. Roughly half of that difference is made up of glans engorgement, but the other half, 1.25 cm or 0.5", is due to the cylinders not being crinkled when inflated. Well, actually they still are, but just a fraction of what they are when they are deflated.
That makes me think I can still grow more. I can grow till the point where the cylinders are 100% without crinkles. Which I estimate to be another 0.5-1.0 cm.
Time will tell.

I also want to add that I am open for the possibility that I haven't gained length. That I somehow get it wrong. Measuring errors (highly unlikely), or some other reason I am not thinking of. But I just don't know what that should be. I really do measure myself longer.