AMS CX vs LGX
-
Gringoinparadise
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2025 7:45 am
AMS CX vs LGX
Hey gentlemen, just looking for some input on experiences with the AMS CX and LGX implants. I’m scheduled for my surgery in about two weeks and am deciding between the two models. From what I’ve read and watched, the LGX’s lengthening claims are minimal at best and there is concern about axial rigidity for longer implants (I am about 7 inches erect so would likely need the longest cylinder available of 21 cm). Also, being on the younger side (45 years old), I haven’t noticed much loss of length to this point, so as long as the CX maintains my current length I’ll be happy. I guess my concerns about the CX are that it turns you into too much of a “shower” and that becomes a nuisance. Also my surgeon seems to be pushing the LGX for some reason. As you might be able to tell, I’m leaning towards the CX right now, but I am still open to hearing others’ personal experiences that they are willing to share. Thanks!
-
ElbowRoom
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2025 1:58 pm
Re: AMS CX vs LGX
All implants will make you a shower, it’s the nature of having fixed length cylinders in your penis. I have a Titan so can’t give you personal experience with AMS, but if it were me I would choose the CX.
58yo Coloplast Titan 28cm Penoscrotal with Dr. Hakky 10/21/2025.
Pre-op erect measurements:
8.5"L and 6.5"C
Post-op: 8”L and 6”C at one week.
8.5” and 6”C at three weeks with full glans engorgement
Pre-op erect measurements:
8.5"L and 6.5"C
Post-op: 8”L and 6”C at one week.
8.5” and 6”C at three weeks with full glans engorgement
-
newhope
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:20 am
Re: AMS CX vs LGX
Gringoinparadise wrote:Hey gentlemen, just looking for some input on experiences with the AMS CX and LGX implants. I’m scheduled for my surgery in about two weeks and am deciding between the two models. From what I’ve read and watched, the LGX’s lengthening claims are minimal at best and there is concern about axial rigidity for longer implants (I am about 7 inches erect so would likely need the longest cylinder available of 21 cm). Also, being on the younger side (45 years old), I haven’t noticed much loss of length to this point, so as long as the CX maintains my current length I’ll be happy. I guess my concerns about the CX are that it turns you into too much of a “shower” and that becomes a nuisance. Also my surgeon seems to be pushing the LGX for some reason. As you might be able to tell, I’m leaning towards the CX right now, but I am still open to hearing others’ personal experiences that they are willing to share. Thanks!
7 inches are no problem for LGX. With LGX you have the certainty that even if the doctor undersize you the expansion of the LGX will "cover" any error. Plus you will have a better flaccid... I would go with LGX anytime
LGX 18 + 1. 2023/12
Pre-OP VED length: 5.5". Post-OP: 4". At 3 months post-op: 5". At 1 yr: 5,3"
Cycling with a lot of pain for the first 5 months, now improving
If you have a motorcycle stop using it (ED with motorcycle accident).
Pre-OP VED length: 5.5". Post-OP: 4". At 3 months post-op: 5". At 1 yr: 5,3"
Cycling with a lot of pain for the first 5 months, now improving
If you have a motorcycle stop using it (ED with motorcycle accident).
-
Boatdrinks
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:04 pm
Re: AMS CX vs LGX
Good luck with your surgery. I am less than two months in with my CX. I was going into the surgery thinking I was going to get the LGX. Due to scarring, my doctor made the decision to switch to CX. I will start cycling next week and will work on regaining my length and girth. I am really digging the new shower that I have
My wife has to approve my out of house attire now..lol
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: amazonbot, ClaudeBot, dan_bionic, Google [Bot], sambalamba, Wally1955 and 30 guests
