I'm writing this post because I'm hoping to see a change here moving forward... where we can engage in meaningful and respectful conversations about these issues without insults, personal attacks, name calling, questioning peoples accounts etc.
That being said, I'd like to share my thoughts, and hear what other's think as well, about these issues.. I'm hoping this can happen between everyone respectfully!?!
First of all, I'm no doctor or expert.. I'm just a guy that's recovering from ED with an IPP (Titan classic) and happily enjoying recovery from it, so far. I do admit though, that in the back of my mind, on rare occasion, I do think about "what if it fails". But, I have no problem sleeping at night... except when I'm having fun w my fiance

As I see it, based on the studies I've seen, read, been discussed here, what my dr has told me, etc etc... I think the claimed 10-20 year life expectancy for IPPs seems to be more the exception than the rule.
I see 2 reputable urologists.. one for my TRT and the other for the IPP. My TRT dr says expect around 8 yrs from it. My other dr says I should get over 10. I'll be stoked if I can get 8+, but will be happy if I get 5. I'm fortunate in that I have good insurance, and I have funds should I need it.. and I am older (not close to being on medicare yet), but in good shape & health (former competitive body builder - retired 3 yrs ago) and a fast healer. I also believe and trust my IPP Dr when he tells me that the rate of infections with his new and revision surgeries have declined dramatically with improved protocols and processes. I can't speak to other Drs methods, results etc.
I acknowledge though, that if today, based on the current state of IPPs, if I was much younger, and/or didn't have insurance or a good financial situation, I would strongly consider an MPP... out of necessity, not preference. I'm not here to argue which is better. They each have their pros/cons etc and both can be effective at curing the ED problem, which at the end of the day is what truly matters, right?
I really like my Titan, however, it's clear that it has a weakness - tube fractures. Other failures seem to be much more infrequent. My Dr says they're working to redesign the tubing out of the same material as their cylcinders, Bioflex, which has proven very durable and reliable. Who knows if this is true, but I hope it is.
As for Boston Scientific IPPs, I don't have any personal experience with them. However, the Tenacio pump recall confirms what my Dr told me early this year about their pumps. He used to use both Coloplast and BS products but has now chosen to use only Coloplast IPPs. He co-authored a study recently that I shared here which showed results consistent with other studies in regards to multiple points of failure in BS IPPs vs primarily single point of failure (tubes) with the Coloplasts.
I'm not here to argue which is better or more reliable, etc, but to simply state what I've heard and read etc and that I think the products made by both companies can and should be better made to be more reliable. I also don't mind if you disagree with any or all what I've said. I invite discussion. Rational, objective, respectful discussion.
Another issue which was posted about by tooyoung is detailed in a video recently produced by Dr Taj. The Dr details how medicare is starting to deny coverage for penile implants in some states. I don't think he stated that just IPPs or all penile prosthetics are being denied or why, but obviously this is very concerning! I invite tooyoung to repost this as an informational post to the forum for discussion. Respectful discussion, please!

ED is such a deeply personal and debilitating problem and for many, this is the only place we can freely and openly express ourselves.This place has been invaluable to me in so many ways and I'm grateful to be part of this community. Let's keep it at least as great as we found it
Peace to all!