Page 2 of 6
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:28 am
by Gt1956
Mark1974 wrote:Flexwheeler wrote:thedriver wrote:Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years
A brother made a thread about the Rigicon malleable. He was not happy at all because of concealment issues. Even after a year in On the other hand he posted a pic of his penis and it was not thin at all.
If you add "rigicon" in the search button you will come across the thread.
The corporotomy made for a malleable is bigger, but it's possible that more residual cavernosal tissue remains because it isn't constantly being compressed by the expansion of hydraulic cylinders
He probably also had 13mm rods, but I wouldn't go beyond 11mm because of erosion issues and may even go 10. If girth kills me psychologically and makes me totally unacceptable to women I will use funds reserved for retirement to get Uro or Phallo-fill, but I hate to do it
And, yes, concealment is an issue with any malleable, even a Rigicon. But concealment is somewhat of an issue with a TItan as well
That is a lot of filler material to get. This is only my opinion. The pics I've seen of dicks with a lot of filler did not look natural at all in my opinion. Just because you can do something does not make that "thing" a wise choice.
Since so many men are afraid of being discovered of having an implant. Why get a constant erection dick that doesn't look normal? That logic totally escapes me.
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 12:40 pm
by Mark1974
Well I'm not proud of getting an implant, but I will tell any potential partner I have one ASAP. I will put it in my dating profile and if I meet someone more organically I will tell them as soon as it isn't too awkward (which is tricky)
The reason to get a malleable is to avoid multiple revision surgeries. I'm planning on getting a Titan, but as soon as it breaks..and it will break...I will put in a Rigicon or whatever is the best in the world at that moment.
The filler won't fill out to normal girth, but it can smooth out the penis, make it look better and make it feel more natural to the touch
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:43 pm
by fucked0ne
You guys must be pretty girthy.
This video of a rigi10 doesn't look too bad. No idea what the diameter of the cylinders happens to be.
Go straight to 7:18:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdLOCHLXAtII mean, between this and the prospect of multiple revisions, the former doesn't look too bad. Then again, I haven't even gotten my first implant yet (so what the fuck do I know).
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:36 pm
by Mark1974
That length indicated that that guy must have had a pretty big penis, because with a malleable doctors are supposed to undersize
He looks 7 inches so I'm guessing he was 8-9, so he probably had substantial girth, but now his penis is slender
My penis is almost 6 so I'll probably end up with 4-4.5 inches of length and not much girth if I get a malleable
I think this is a more typical example 3:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atezGW0V2Bc
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 12:22 am
by easymoney
I have had a rigicon since 6-2023 .... 13mm rods ... 14 is the largest they make .. I have no issue hiding it .. but have a belly and a fat pad so all that counts .. after a couple of months you can't even tell you have one for the most part ..
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 12:25 am
by fucked0ne
Mark1974:
You're probably right about this guy having a larger than average penis.
I haven't heard of losing 1 to 2 inches but rather 1 to 2
centimeters. I think it really depends on the doctor.
At 1:48, Kramer briefly mentions undersizing by about a centimeter:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaekOCY8Y_Y&list=PL3fz3CCGiMrTWMr1f7dBILKooh_qOUr6SIf, in fact, it is suggested to undersize by 2
inches, that's fucking absurd. The malleable does have certain advantages over the IPP (virtually no possibility of device failure), and so the industry should really start wracking their brains to create better malleables in terms of size maintenance. They can do it.
easymoney:
"after a couple of months you can't even tell you have one for the most part"
Could you please elaborate?
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2024 4:16 am
by frank66665
easymoney, please could you tell us your length and girth before and after rigicon
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 8:29 pm
by thedriver
Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".
The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.
Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.
There has to be an error in my thinking.
Are you saying the Titan measurement is at 21mm and the AMS at 18mm at the fully inflated diameter ?
What are they deflated ?
Can anyone confirm these diameters ?
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 8:30 pm
by thedriver
thedriver wrote:Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".
The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.
Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.
There has to be an error in my thinking.
Are you saying the Titan measurement is at 21mm and the AMS at 18mm at the fully inflated diameter ?
What are they deflated ?
Can anyone confirm these diameters ?
Where can I find all these figures ?
Re: Rigicon Rigi10 MPP safety study
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2024 8:30 pm
by thedriver
thedriver wrote:thedriver wrote:Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".
The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.
Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.
There has to be an error in my thinking.
Are you saying the Titan measurement is at 21mm and the AMS at 18mm at the fully inflated diameter ?
What are they deflated ?
Can anyone confirm these diameters ?
Where can I find all these figures ?