36, Healthy & Fit, Implant Journal AMS CX

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
JimBob07
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2016 9:34 am

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby JimBob07 » Sun Mar 19, 2023 8:58 pm

My question exactly! It looks great after the Trimix. Is it not useable?

profirefight
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 7:07 am

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby profirefight » Mon Mar 20, 2023 8:42 am

Because I’m 35, and I don’t want to rely on shots for the rest of my life. If I were much much older and just started having ED, I would use the shots. But for
Me, I’m young and spontaneous sex is not doable with shots, and the implant will give me that. Plus, I’d be looking at doing the implant at some point anyway. Years and years of tri mix use in the frequency that I would be using it would damage my penis or I would
Be scared it would damage my penis and and implant would be the next step anyway
36 now, ED at age 24,Cialis/Viagra worked and then stopped. Diagnosed with Venous Leak- Implanted June 2023 with AMS 700 CX 21cm with 1cm rear tip extender by Dean Knoll (Nashville)
Pre-Op Size (bone-pressed) 7.5 L, 5.5 G

googly3
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:04 pm

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby googly3 » Mon Mar 20, 2023 9:32 pm

profirefight wrote:Because I’m 35, and I don’t want to rely on shots for the rest of my life. If I were much much older and just started having ED, I would use the shots. But for
Me, I’m young and spontaneous sex is not doable with shots, and the implant will give me that. Plus, I’d be looking at doing the implant at some point anyway. Years and years of tri mix use in the frequency that I would be using it would damage my penis or I would
Be scared it would damage my penis and and implant would be the next step anyway


That makes sense, best of luck to you. I just had one thought - I'm a little confused why your surgeon would opt for the CX? From whatever I've read on here, that's usually the second option, especially for those folks who have plaque, bad case of Peyronie's etc. It does not expand like the LGX. Sure you can say that you have a good length already and don't need the 'extra' bump. But we all know there is some loss associated with surgery and wouldn't you go for the option that provides you ability to grow back a little? Also infrapubic is a bit harder for the patient. Sorry I could be completely wrong and I don't mean to confuse you at this point, but since it's a major thing in your life, I did want to make sure you considered all the options.
33 y/o, suffering from ED as long as I can remember. Never had random boners. Pills worked for a few years, but now losing efficacy. Venous leak confirmed by Dr. Garber. Likely going the implant route at some point.

profirefight
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 7:07 am

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby profirefight » Wed Mar 22, 2023 9:42 pm

googly3 wrote:
profirefight wrote:Because I’m 35, and I don’t want to rely on shots for the rest of my life. If I were much much older and just started having ED, I would use the shots. But for
Me, I’m young and spontaneous sex is not doable with shots, and the implant will give me that. Plus, I’d be looking at doing the implant at some point anyway. Years and years of tri mix use in the frequency that I would be using it would damage my penis or I would
Be scared it would damage my penis and and implant would be the next step anyway


That makes sense, best of luck to you. I just had one thought - I'm a little confused why your surgeon would opt for the CX? From whatever I've read on here, that's usually the second option, especially for those folks who have plaque, bad case of Peyronie's etc. It does not expand like the LGX. Sure you can say that you have a good length already and don't need the 'extra' bump. But we all know there is some loss associated with surgery and wouldn't you go for the option that provides you ability to grow back a little? Also infrapubic is a bit harder for the patient. Sorry I could be completely wrong and I don't mean to confuse you at this point, but since it's a major thing in your life, I did want to make sure you considered all the options.


All I know is what Dean Knoll told me and what he recommended. And he is extremely high volume with this surgery and travels the globe to teach how to do it correctly. He prefers infrapubic, and I didn’t question him on it. If it had been someone not as highly regarded as such a “Titan” in the industry like Knoll is I would definitely not have full trust but with him I do. Also, he suggested the CX because he said the LGX wouldn’t give me what I need in terms of length and the CX will give me a harder erection.
36 now, ED at age 24,Cialis/Viagra worked and then stopped. Diagnosed with Venous Leak- Implanted June 2023 with AMS 700 CX 21cm with 1cm rear tip extender by Dean Knoll (Nashville)
Pre-Op Size (bone-pressed) 7.5 L, 5.5 G

sswinsfba
Posts: 572
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2023 3:08 pm

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby sswinsfba » Wed Mar 22, 2023 11:57 pm

googly3 wrote:But we all know there is some loss associated with surgery . . . Also infrapubic is a bit harder for the patient.


Neither of these statements is (necessarily) true.

I had an infrapublic implant with not problems whatsoever -- no pain whatsoever, approved to cycle in 1 wk and to have sex in 3 -- and lost no length and gained girth (with a Titan Touch).

From what I've read here, more people complain of pain from penoscrotal than infrapublic and those who complain of losing length previously suffered from complications that contributed to that or never accurately measured the size of their dick to begin with.

--------------------------------------------------

OP: There's no reason to second guess your decision and IMO the less time you spend on FT before the surgery the better, espeically if people are going to make you question it.

Best wishes & good luck!
Age 73. Started taking 5 mg Cialis daily in 2000. Minor ED started in 2021. Major ED problem started in 2022. Coloplast Titan (20 cm w/1cm RTE) implanted infrapublicly on 01/24/2023 by Dr. Edward Karpman (El Camino Urology Medical Group, Mt. View, CA).

profirefight
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 7:07 am

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby profirefight » Thu Apr 06, 2023 12:51 pm

Hi guys, I’ve been off the board for a bit dealing with life stuff, you know how it can be…

Anyways, insurance DID NOT cover my surgery so I will be paying out of pocket. I am just happy that I am lucky enough to be able to pay for it.

My surgery date is June 13th with Dr. Dean Knoll. I am beyond excited and thrilled to have this man do my surgery. He is currently in Hawaii teaching other surgeons how to do the IPP surgery and is averaging 13 implants a week!!!

His care coordinater (her name is Kim) has been absolutely amazing. Answering all questions and available anytime I need her. She has been with Dr. Knoll for 34 years and says he could do the IPP surgery in his sleep and that I have absolutely NOTHING to worry about.

I will update and let you all know as things get closer.
36 now, ED at age 24,Cialis/Viagra worked and then stopped. Diagnosed with Venous Leak- Implanted June 2023 with AMS 700 CX 21cm with 1cm rear tip extender by Dean Knoll (Nashville)
Pre-Op Size (bone-pressed) 7.5 L, 5.5 G

silver daddy 1960
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2019 6:53 pm

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby silver daddy 1960 » Thu Apr 06, 2023 1:09 pm

Sorry to hear about the insurance, but excited for you! Look forward to June 13th., it will be the start of a new beginning for you! Keep us up to date and no worries it will be fine.
63 yrs old, NYC, DR. Eid Titan Coloplast Dec 10, 2021

sswinsfba
Posts: 572
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2023 3:08 pm

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby sswinsfba » Thu Apr 06, 2023 2:30 pm

profirefight wrote:Anyways, insurance DID NOT cover my surgery so I will be paying out of pocket. I am just happy that I am lucky enough to be able to pay for it.


For the benefit of others who may also have to pay out of pocket, how much is Dr. Knoll charging you for the implant?
Age 73. Started taking 5 mg Cialis daily in 2000. Minor ED started in 2021. Major ED problem started in 2022. Coloplast Titan (20 cm w/1cm RTE) implanted infrapublicly on 01/24/2023 by Dr. Edward Karpman (El Camino Urology Medical Group, Mt. View, CA).

Old Guy
Posts: 2509
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:31 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby Old Guy » Thu Apr 06, 2023 4:27 pm

Congrats on getting scheduled for the implant. Hope all goes well. Stinks that you have to pay out of pocket but nice you are able to. Best of luck!
Nov. 8, 2019
4+ years, Coloplast Titan OTR
Married 36 years to my beautiful young bride
Always here to answer questions if you PM me

profirefight
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 7:07 am

Re: 35, Young, Fit, highly considering Inflatable Implant

Postby profirefight » Fri Apr 07, 2023 4:46 am

sswinsfba wrote:
profirefight wrote:Anyways, insurance DID NOT cover my surgery so I will be paying out of pocket. I am just happy that I am lucky enough to be able to pay for it.


For the benefit of others who may also have to pay out of pocket, how much is Dr. Knoll charging you for the implant?


16k
36 now, ED at age 24,Cialis/Viagra worked and then stopped. Diagnosed with Venous Leak- Implanted June 2023 with AMS 700 CX 21cm with 1cm rear tip extender by Dean Knoll (Nashville)
Pre-Op Size (bone-pressed) 7.5 L, 5.5 G


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: daddel, fade3W and 83 guests