Seeking Karpman Implantees

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.



Injustright
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:14 pm

Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby Injustright » Mon Aug 22, 2022 4:53 pm

Hey all,

Have a few weeks before my last appointment with Dr. K and am wondering if I should pawn off my VEDs on someone else or keep and expect to use them. Would really appreciate hearing others' instructions from him. Feel free to PM me if you'd rather not make some statement publicly.

Oh yeah, and any other stories, fun or informative, are appreciated.

Anxiously waiting first tryout. :?
Decades+ ED; finally ultrasound showed venous leak+arterial insufficiency. Infrapubic (Yay!) implant by Dr. Karpman 8/9/22; with 13 cm distal, 9 proximal Titan. Cleared for new life 9/1/22 and hoping to make up for lost time.

2435tjklAS
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby 2435tjklAS » Mon Aug 22, 2022 5:08 pm

Why would you pawn them off? You'll definitely have a use for them after the procedure.
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, '21. Replaced Titan 28cm, Jan. 14, '25

Proved implants increase dick size

Abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant

Pre-op size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: smaller

Goal: 10" x 6"+

Injustright
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:14 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby Injustright » Mon Aug 22, 2022 5:57 pm

2435tjklAS wrote:Why would you pawn them off? You'll definitely have a use for them after the procedure.


That's kind of what I'm trying to ascertain. The only medical journal article I've been able to spot suggests VED use after implant was valuable for increasing length, but the study was limited only to AMS 700 LGX models which are supposedly designed to expand length-wise. I want to know about Coloplast Titans that Karpman is using now.

(Plus I have more than one pump to give away or sell.)
Decades+ ED; finally ultrasound showed venous leak+arterial insufficiency. Infrapubic (Yay!) implant by Dr. Karpman 8/9/22; with 13 cm distal, 9 proximal Titan. Cleared for new life 9/1/22 and hoping to make up for lost time.

gjmjoe017
Posts: 1055
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:32 am
Location: NW Arkansas

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby gjmjoe017 » Mon Aug 22, 2022 6:43 pm

I’m a Titan guy and have used mine for almost two years with good result!
71 yrs.old married,ED for 7 yrs.Pills for 3 yrs,TriMix for 21/2 yrs.6 1/2 inches flacid,71/4 inches erect,6 inches girth.Coloplast Titan put in 11/13/20,Dr.Bozeman,Arkansas Urology,Little Rock.22cm + 2 RTE.

2435tjklAS
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby 2435tjklAS » Mon Aug 22, 2022 10:18 pm

Read all of the study I attached. What is says in the intro/conclusion:

Introduction. The most prevalent long-term complaint after successful inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is reduction of penile length. The purpose of this study was to evaluate penile measurements in patients whose implantation experience included the aggressive new length measurement technique (NLMT) coupled with postoperative IPP rehabilitation (daily inflation) of the implant for 1 year.

Conclusion. This study suggests using the Coloplast Titan IPP with aggressive cylinder sizing, and a postoperative penile rehabilitation inflation protocol may help optimize patient satisfaction and erectile penile measurements.


For size specifics:

Penile measurement increases at 12 months, as compared with immediately postoperative represented statistically significant differences for erect, stretched, and flaccid penis. Pubic bone to meatus measurements increased by 1.14 cm (P = 0.003), 0.99 cm (P = 0.002), and 1.04 cm (P = 0.006) for erect, flaccid, and stretched penis, respectively. Penile circumference (1.08 ± 0.82, P = 0.001) and width (0.47 ± 0.32, P = 0.001) of the penis also increased significantly (Table 2 and Figure 1). All 15 objective penile measurements from 6 to 12 months postimplantation showed statistically significant increases (Table 2).


Image

Henry, G. D., Carrion, R., Jennermann, C., & Wang, R. u. n. (2015). Prospective Evaluation of Postoperative Penile Rehabilitation: Penile Length/Girth Maintenance 1 Year Following Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(5), 1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12833

For both an AMX and Titan all the medical research I can find supports that VED use before and after surgery is proven time and time again to regain/gain more penis size.

The #1 patient compliant about implants no longer needs to be about losing size.
Attachments
Journal of Sexual Medicine - 2015 - Henry - Prospective Evaluation of Postoperative Penile Rehabilitation Penile Length.pdf
(209.3 KiB) Downloaded 51 times
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, '21. Replaced Titan 28cm, Jan. 14, '25

Proved implants increase dick size

Abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant

Pre-op size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: smaller

Goal: 10" x 6"+

Injustright
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:14 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby Injustright » Mon Aug 22, 2022 10:40 pm

I don’t think the cited article has anything to do with the application of VEDs, so it’s not really on the subject.
Decades+ ED; finally ultrasound showed venous leak+arterial insufficiency. Infrapubic (Yay!) implant by Dr. Karpman 8/9/22; with 13 cm distal, 9 proximal Titan. Cleared for new life 9/1/22 and hoping to make up for lost time.

2435tjklAS
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby 2435tjklAS » Mon Aug 22, 2022 11:09 pm

Really? I don't think you've read the study yet:
Simple daily inflation. However, when we analyze the change in penile measurements from 6 to 12 months, there was a statistically significant increase in all 15 penile measurements. This appears be attributed to the protocol of maximum inflation for at least 1 hour daily. Tissue expansion involves making the tunica albuginea more compliant so it will stretch and allow larger distention by the inflated cylinder. Experience with repetitive vacuum device application shows the tunica will respond with short exposures to the vacuum therapy. Sellers et al. showed that 10 minutes a day of vacuum device application twice a day for 7 weeks promoted visible penile lengthening in the vacuum cylinder when marked weekly in first-time implant patients. It also, and more importantly, allowed the implanting physician to upsize his cylinder approximately 3 cm when compared with the average implant without vacuum preparation [21]. The application of vacuum to a penis with corporal fibrosis has also been described to preserve length preventing some of the shrinkage that accompanies removal of an IPP for infection. The published literature is, at best, anecdotal, but the belief is widespread among frequent implanters. The pressure difference between a hydraulic pump push inside the penis compared with low pneumatic suction on the external penis should be more than a thousand-fold stronger.


Important: there's clear and convincing evidence throughout the medical research that VEDs stop size losses. This Henry (2015) study I attached here even says, "The published literature is, at best, anecdotal, but the belief is widespread among frequent implanters." But that's wrong, because the published literature is NOT anecdotal anymore. It was in 2015 when that study occurred 7 years ago. But it's not now, and I've already got like 15 sources or something collected that I'll be posting soon. Right now I'm finding new research by going through all the citations of any given study and getting full-text of what they cited.

I've learned that when reading the full-text of other studies on this topic, when the dates start to get back to 2015 or 2010 or even before, the literature does report on common complaints about size losses. But when I'm reading sources that are more up-to-date, that's not a complaint anymore.

Do you know what that means?
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, '21. Replaced Titan 28cm, Jan. 14, '25

Proved implants increase dick size

Abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant

Pre-op size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: smaller

Goal: 10" x 6"+

Injustright
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:14 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby Injustright » Tue Aug 23, 2022 12:23 am

Yes. I can read scientific articles, including the portion of the article that references VED use pre-surgery. The particular publication you mention says next to nothing about post surgical use of VEDs. The Sellars et al study cited in the article referred to the benefit of VED use prior to surgery for allowing the maximization of implant size. It wasn’t focused on post implant rehabilitation.
Decades+ ED; finally ultrasound showed venous leak+arterial insufficiency. Infrapubic (Yay!) implant by Dr. Karpman 8/9/22; with 13 cm distal, 9 proximal Titan. Cleared for new life 9/1/22 and hoping to make up for lost time.

2435tjklAS
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 10:17 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby 2435tjklAS » Tue Aug 23, 2022 8:27 am

Injustright wrote:Yes. I can read scientific articles, including the portion of the article that references VED use pre-surgery. The particular publication you mention says next to nothing about post surgical use of VEDs. The Sellars et al study cited in the article referred to the benefit of VED use prior to surgery for allowing the maximization of implant size. It wasn’t focused on post implant rehabilitation.


Just use a fucking VED before and after. It's good for both. Let me spell it out for you more.

The whole summary of the Canguven study is worth a read:

Patient concerns about penile length after penile prosthesis (PP) implantation for erectile dysfunction (ED) have significant impact on patients and their partners. In addition, corporal fibrosis is associated with difficult PP implantation. The preoperative use of vacuum erectile devices (VED) is an uncommon physical treatment for such concerns. Therefore, the current randomized controlled study assessed two outcomes: whether pre-operative VED use for a month before surgery would significantly increase flaccid stretched penile length (SPL) on the day of surgery, and facilitate easier corporal dilatation intraoperatively. Fifty-one patients scheduled for PP implantation for ED were randomized to either intervention group (pre-operative VED use; 10–15 min/day for ≥30 days; Group A; n = 25), or control group (no intervention; Group B; n = 26). A research assistant (blinded to the treatment assignments) recorded SPL at baseline (initial consultation) and on day of surgery. The surgeons performing the PP implantation (also blinded to the treatment assignments) provided subjective assessments of the ease of corporal dilatation. Baseline patient characteristics, demographics, and comorbidities were the same in both groups. Baseline measurements (SPL-1) were 10.71 1.28 and 10.87 1.26 cm in Group A and Group B, respectively; and the day of surgery measurements (SPL-2) were 11.50 1.33 and 11.06 1.34 cm in Group A and Group B, respectively. In terms of outcomes: mean SPL increase in Group A was significantly more by a mean of 0.80 0.38 cm (p < 0.05) compared to Group B; and surgeons’ subjective report of surgical ease indicated smoother corporal dilatation for Group A compared to Group B. VED use (10–15 min/day during the month prior to PP implantation) was associated with significantly increased SPL on day of surgery, and facilitated easier corporal dilatation intraoperatively. Future studies should examine the long-term outcomes of penile prosthesis implantation after pre-operative use of vacuum erectile devices.


For specifics:
When pre-operative VED is used, SPL [flaccid stretched penile length] could increase by a mean of 0.80 +- 0.38 cm. In addition, the surgeon is provided with better opportunity to restore longer penile length that replicates an appearance more consistent with the patient’s natural erection. Ease of corporal dilation allows for an appropriate size cylinder to be inserted, and thus helps to maximize patient satisfaction post-operatively. There were no negative intraoperative complications associated with the use of pre-operative VED, and therefore, if patients have access to it, VEDs can safely be recommended. Future studies among larger samples will help assess the long-term outcomes and outline the role of VED as a valuable intervention prior to PP implantation.

Canguven, O., Talib, R. A., Campbell, J., De Young, L., El Ansari, W., & Al-Ansari, A. (2017). Is the daily use of vacuum erection device for a month before penile prosthesis implantation beneficial? A randomized controlled trial. Andrology, 5(1), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12258

THIS IS ABOUT USING A VED AFTER SURGERY. The fact that it's about the AMS doesn't mean anything.

Penile shortening after inflatable penile prosthesis placement for erectile dysfunction is a common postoperative patient complaint and can reduce overall satisfaction with the procedure. In this prospective study we report our results regarding penile dimensions and patient satisfaction outcomes after 1 year of follow-up from AMSTMLGX700® penile prosthesis implant with 6 months of vacuum erectile device therapy. Seventy-four selected patients with medically refractory erectile dysfunction underwent AMSTM LGX 700® IPP placement. Postoperatively, patients were assigned vacuum device therapy for 5 min twice daily. Follow-up continued for 1 year after surgery. Dimensional and functional results were assessed. Baseline median preoperative stretched penile length and girth were 14 cm (range 10-17) and 9 cm (range 7-12), respectively. At the end of the study penile median dimensional outcomes were 17 cm (range 13-23) for length and 11 cm (range 10-13) for girth while a median number of 24 pumps (range 18–29) to fully inflate the device was seen. Baseline median International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score was 9 (range 5-11), at 6 months 20 (range 18-26) and at 1 year was 25 (range 20-27) (p<0.0001). Median Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) score at the end of the follow-up was 74 (range 66–78). Our postoperative rehabilitation program is feasible and should be recommended after prothesis surgery in order to increase overall satisfaction with the procedure. Penile postoperative dimensional outcomes were statistically significant improved and complications were negligible.


Antonini, G., De Berardinis, E., Busetto, G. M., Del Giudice, F., Chung, B. I., Conti, S. L., Ferro, M., Musi, G., Fragas, R., De Cobelli, O., Sperduti, I., Gross, M. S., & Perito, P. E. (2020). Postoperative vacuum therapy following AMSTM LGX 700® inflatable penile prosthesis placement: Penile dimension outcomes and overall satisfaction. International Journal of Impotence Research, 32(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-019-0125-z\
The results of our study suggest that the AMS 700 LGX IPP could be used to prevent penile
shortening in patients undergoing IPP implantation. Furthermore, erectile function and patient satisfaction were improved excellently. The mean stretched flaccid penile length was 11.1 ± 0.8 cm at baseline and was longer at 3 months (11.9 ± 0.9 cm, P < 0.001), 6 months (12.0 ± 0.9 cm, P < 0.001) and 12months (12.2 ± 0.7 cm, P < 0.001) postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the stretched flaccid penile length between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.31). The mean and penile length with the IPP fully inflated was 11.8 ± 1.2 at baseline, 12.6 ± 1.0 at 3 months, 12.6 ± 1.1 at 6months, and 12.7 ± 1.2 at 12 months. There was a statistically significant difference in penile length with the IPP fully inflated from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.001). No statistical difference in penile length with the IPP fully inflated was noted between 6 and 12months (P = 0.14) (Table 2).


Kim, K. S., Bae, W. J., Kim, S. W., & Lee, M. Y. (2019). Experience with AMS 700 LGX penile prostheses for preserving penile length in Korea. BMC Urology, 19(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0425-5


PI surgery does not decrease penile size compared to the preoperative stretched measure but preserves or increases it for the great majority of patients. Men having an IPP are likely to witness a more substantial length increase than those with a MPP. The outcome of PI surgery was not affected by co-morbidities such as diabetes, HTN or PD. Preoperative penile length and girth correlate well with the immediate postoperative erect penis. Recording penile dimensions in the clinic and agreeing these with patients’ preoperatively may be a way of improving satisfaction levels with penile size postoperatively. It is interesting to speculate whether some men who are concerned about penile size preoperatively would be better managed by either psychosexual counselling or if the IPP may give greater satisfaction. In any event, patients can be reassured that no immediate direct size loss is expected in the great majority of cases.


Habous, M., Giona, S., Tealab, A., Aziz, M., Sherif, H., Abdelwahab, O., Binsaleh, S., Ralph, D., Bettocchi, C., Mulhall, J. P., & Muir, G. (2019). Penile length is preserved after implant surgery. BJU International, 123(5), 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14604

Loss of erectile length is common following radical prostatectomy and in select cases following placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). In an effort to maintain penile length and minimize shortening, and offer a degree of length recovery, cylinders with controlled length expansion have been developed (LGX cylinders, American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN). It has been theorized that, over time, repeated inflation of these cylinders will cause stretching of the corporal bodies and promote increased erectile length. We report prospective length data from a series of men implanted with LGX cylinders.
Methods: Twenty patients underwent implantation of a 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis, utilizing LGX cylinders. Penile length, as measured from pubic bone to tip of the glans penis with the prosthesis maximally inflated, was assessed at 2 weeks post-surgery as a baseline, and then at 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgery. Patients were instructed to begin daily inflation of the prosthesis for 1 hr starting at 2 wks postsurgery and continuing until 3 mths after surgery. At that point, the regimen was modified to 15 minutes per day a minimum of 4 days per week.
Results: Median follow-up was 11 mths (6–18 mths); all length changes are reported as median values (range). At 6 mths post-IPP, length gain from baseline was 9 mm (5–20 mm). At 12 and 18 mths respectively, increases of 20 mm (5–35 mm), and 30 mm (10–45 mm) were noted. Interval changes between 6 and 12 mths were 11.5 mm (0–25 mm) and a further 9 mm (0–25 mm) from 12–18 mths. There were no instances of length loss noted from baseline values in this series.
Conclusion: A dedicated post-operative inflation protocol promotes increased measured erectile length in men implanted with controlled length expansion (LGX) cylinders.


Christine, B, MD; Bella, A, MD. Controlled Length Expansion Cylinders: A Defined Post-Operative Inflation Protocol Yields Measurable Length Gain. Southeastern Section of the American Urological Association, Inc. (SESAUA).




METHODS: 750 Patients are instructed to use a vacuum erection device for 10 minutes each day for up to 2 months prior to IPP implant. After two months, maximization of cylinder length is accomplished regardless of IPP manufacturer. Cylinders are left partially inflated in the postoperative period and daily inflation for 3 months immediately upon patient tolerance. The average implanted cylinder length has increased dramatically with the preoperative vacuum usage when compared to the authors’ previous implantations and when compared to the national average of implanted cylinders obtained from one manufacturer.

RESULTS: Preoperative use of the vacuum device has allowed maximization of cylinder length. After the vacuum program, patients tend to experience less pain following implantation allowing earlier device instruction cycling and use. The average implanted cylinder length continued to increase annually for the first 5 years as the protocol evolved and seems to have remained stable for the last five years.

CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative vacuum usage and postoperative capsule management has nearly eliminated patient complaints of reduced penile length. We believe this to be the result of larger size cylinders being implanted when compared to our previous implantations absent of the patient participation protocol.


Sellers, T., Dineen, M., Salem, E. A., & Wilson, S. K. (2013). Vacuum Preparation, Optimization of Cylinder Length and Postoperative Daily Inflation Reduces Complaints of Shortened Penile Length Following Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis. Advances in Sexual Medicine, 3(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.4236/asm.2013.31003

Eighteen patients were included in the penile measurement substudy. Both the flaccid and stretched penile measurements showed an increase from preoperative to postoperative. The flaccid penis measurements increased 2.43 cm (range 1.4– 3.2 cm), from 8.57 cm preoperatively to 11 cm postoperatively. After IPP implantation, the erect measurement increased 1.73 cm (1.1–2.2 cm), from 10.71 cm to 12.44 cm, after suspensory ligament incision. No substudy patients had a shorter penis preoperative to postoperative…
As demonstrated in this cohort of patients, insertion of a penile implant with concomitant incision of the suspensory ligament minimizes the risk of phallus shortening with excellent satisfaction of the patient. This is in contrast to some studies going up to 30% with patients complaining of shortening of the penis [9,16].


Borges, F., Hakim, L., & Kline, C. (2006). ORIGINAL RESEARCH—SURGERY: Surgical Technique to Maintain Penile Length After Insertion of an Inflatable Penile Prosthesis via Infrapubic Approach. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3(3), 550–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00232.x

9 and 16 refer to Montorsi et al., European Urology, 2000 and Montorsi et al.
International Journal of Impotence Research, 1996 – so, well, those studies are two decades old.

The patients were encouraged to use the traction device for a minimum of 3 hours per day for 2–4 months. Following the traction period, SPL was measured, and this was compared with inflated penile prosthesis erect penile length, measured from the same points from the pubis to the corona dorsally. In doing our measurements this way, we felt that we would have two reliable and repeatable points for measurement.
Although not all men gained length following prosthesis placement compared with their pretraction length, none of these patients lost length, and 70% gained length of up to 1.5 cm.
….It does appear from this small prospective, but noncontrolled study, that men with penile shortening before penile prosthesis surgery may prevent further length loss or possibly gain some additional length as a result of short-term preoperative ETT. The protocol was safe and well tolerated, as there were no local complications and no change in penile sensation. But the protocol is a tedious one, and to be effective, it requires a serious commitment from the patient. Clearly, larger scale studies will be necessary, possibly with a non-traction control arm. This approach could also be considered for men who do not have significant penile scarring, where the potential for gaining even more length may be possible prior to penile prosthesis implantation.

Levine, L. A., & Rybak, J. (2011). Traction Therapy for Men with Shortened Penis Prior to Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Pilot Study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(7), 2112–2117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02285.x

In our study, the stretched penile length was at least 1 cm longer at 12 months than preoperative and 6 months measurements in all patients, confirming the elastic properties of the penis, irrespective of the normality or abnormality of the corpora cavernosa…. Overall our study shows that the AMS 700 LGX provides a reliable solution to short penis syndrome post‑IPP implantation, providing a penile length comparable to the natural erection. The AMS 700 LGX is a powerful tool to preserve penile length in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation as demonstrated by the high satisfaction rate, with 80% of patients satisfied with their final penile length. Therefore, the AMS 700 LGX should be considered in all patients (except those with penile fibrosis or scarring) in order to preserve penile length, allowing time for mechanical, behavioral and psychosexual adaptation.

Augusto Negro, C. L., Paradiso, M., Rocca, A., & Bardari, F. (2016). Implantation of AMS 700 LGX penile prosthesis preserves penile length without the need for penile lengthening procedures. Asian Journal of Andrology, 18(1), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.154311

The Figures are worth looking at in the Augusto study.
Image

Do you need any more proof???? Maybe I can get a doctor or researcher to write it out in plain text for the people of FrankTalk to understand: "hey old dudes, use a VED before AND after surgery because they're good for your dick!! You know how your weak and mostly impotent dick is like now?? Wellllll, a VED makes it bigger and better!!!!!!!!!!"
Last edited by 2435tjklAS on Tue Aug 23, 2022 10:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
40. AMS 700 LGX, 21+3. Nov. 2, '21. Replaced Titan 28cm, Jan. 14, '25

Proved implants increase dick size

Abused alcohol for brain injury, abused viagra for implant

Pre-op size: 8.75" x 5.7"

Current: smaller

Goal: 10" x 6"+

Injustright
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2022 3:14 pm

Re: Seeking Karpman Implantees

Postby Injustright » Tue Aug 23, 2022 9:11 am

Get some therapy. You are way too fixated on this.
Decades+ ED; finally ultrasound showed venous leak+arterial insufficiency. Infrapubic (Yay!) implant by Dr. Karpman 8/9/22; with 13 cm distal, 9 proximal Titan. Cleared for new life 9/1/22 and hoping to make up for lost time.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bandit, GBDS22206, Google [Bot] and 63 guests