I know there are many pictures of people's penises here but pictures are pictures, you can't REALLY tell what things are like in real life.
So, i was wondering how anatomically correct implants are, especially compared with the "original penis" (before implant)?
Looking at pictures of the actual implants, it seems they are all "generic", straight tubes with a standard size and shape. However, we all know all dicks are different. For example, i know mine is pretty particular in it's downward curve. I am also pretty happy to have one that, even if small, is "proportional" and no part of it is too big or too small to a point that it looks weird... If i was to get an implant one day, are they capable of molding the actual hardware to simulate what i originally had? Or do you just get a "generic" dick that is straight as a rod, aimed at "2 o'clock" and that's it?
Do you also get the slightly triangular shape of the erect penis, with the large bulge all along the underside of the shaft, under the two corpus cavernosas?
How anatomically correct are implants?
How anatomically correct are implants?
39 years old, married. ED all my life because of spinal cord injury caused by a tumor in early infant age. Using standard EDEX20 since 2007. Increasingly bad results with EDEX in the last few years, but had very good results for at least 10 years.
-
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
From experience with my own and seeing pics of others, I think the large majority of implants point straight out at 3:00. As for the triangular shape of the natural dick, no that is one of the downsides of the implant. They only inflate the corpora cavernosa with the two rods, while the spongiosum (bottom area of the shaft) is not inflated, resulting in a flatter penis than you had before. This can be offset some by taking Viagra etc to get blood flow to your spongiosum.
Early 30s with ED for years from penis enlargement stretching and jelqing. Implant by Dr Eid on 24 June 2021 with a Titan 24cm with +1cm RTE on one side and -1cm cut off on the other side
My journal: viewtopic.php?t=17202
My journal: viewtopic.php?t=17202
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
wolfpacker wrote:From experience with my own and seeing pics of others, I think the large majority of implants point straight out at 3:00. As for the triangular shape of the natural dick, no that is one of the downsides of the implant. They only inflate the corpora cavernosa with the two rods, while the spongiosum (bottom area of the shaft) is not inflated, resulting in a flatter penis than you had before. This can be offset some by taking Viagra etc to get blood flow to your spongiosum.
I see. That explains the "loss of girth" many people are reporting. If you lose the spongiosum part of the erection, even if it's usually not too big, it'll end up losing overall girth...
Sucks, especially for people with smaller dicks to begin with :/
39 years old, married. ED all my life because of spinal cord injury caused by a tumor in early infant age. Using standard EDEX20 since 2007. Increasingly bad results with EDEX in the last few years, but had very good results for at least 10 years.
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
I think you may be focusing too much on appearance and not the real reason I, and most of us, was implanted. My "original" penis no longer functioned. It is darned hard to have sex without an erection. So I am happy to have a penis that works when I want it to work. Yes, it may be a little flatter or a bit more straight--but the real reason I was implanted was not for a cosmetic purpose--it was to regain function. The straight cylinders work great--and I am happy every time I pump and they fill so I can have an erection and enjoy sex. Is it perfect? No, but given where I was, I am very happy with the results and like many others wonder why I waited so long to have it done.
Bob Doan
65 yo, Prostate Cancer - radiation therapy 2018, ED 20 years used pills, MUSE, trimix. Weekly testosterone injections for TRT. AMS 700 CX implanted Feb 12, 2021, 18/1, by Dr Herati, Johns Hopkins
65 yo, Prostate Cancer - radiation therapy 2018, ED 20 years used pills, MUSE, trimix. Weekly testosterone injections for TRT. AMS 700 CX implanted Feb 12, 2021, 18/1, by Dr Herati, Johns Hopkins
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
Of course, i am well aware of the reasons behind getting an implant.
However, there are many things to consider, when deciding, and i was curious about this, less talked about, side of it.
However, there are many things to consider, when deciding, and i was curious about this, less talked about, side of it.
39 years old, married. ED all my life because of spinal cord injury caused by a tumor in early infant age. Using standard EDEX20 since 2007. Increasingly bad results with EDEX in the last few years, but had very good results for at least 10 years.
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
Hunchback wrote:Of course, i am well aware of the reasons behind getting an implant.
However, there are many things to consider, when deciding, and i was curious about this, less talked about, side of it.
There isn't much difference in my penis now since my implant. A little length loss but a slight gain in girth.
One thing to remember is many of the pictures you see on FT are guys with recent implants. Mine was kind of flat at first, now it's more round. I believe the cylinders become flexible with use giving more of a natural look.
Nov. 8, 2019
4+ years, Coloplast Titan OTR
Married 36 years to my beautiful young bride
Always here to answer questions if you PM me
4+ years, Coloplast Titan OTR
Married 36 years to my beautiful young bride
Always here to answer questions if you PM me
-
- Posts: 6148
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
My implanted penis, when the implant is inflated, is identical in every aspect to my pre-implant erect penis in size, curve (slightly upward, gentle curve) and length. Girth appears to be about the same, though I did not have the foresight to measure before implantation. The one difference is the cross-sectional shape. Not as round. It does fill out somewhat when I am aroused, but still not as round as before implant, it seems to me, by my memory.
There is perhaps another difference. The angle of my erection. When I was young, my erection nearly touched my belly. Now that I am older, my belly nearly touches my erection. But men, as they age, often naturally lose some angle even those not experiencing ED.
The main point remains, however, that an erect penis, no matter how un-round or laser-straight is capable of coitus whereas a softly erect penis, no matter how pleasing and natural-appearing it may be, is not capable of coitus.
So, do you want to LOOK good or BE good? (That question is not meant to insult men who want both or are simply concerned with appearance, so please do not take offense.) This little essay is merely meant to point out that implants have their anatomical/cosmetic limitations. Limitations that pale in comparison to their primary purpose, to enable coitus to occur.
There is perhaps another difference. The angle of my erection. When I was young, my erection nearly touched my belly. Now that I am older, my belly nearly touches my erection. But men, as they age, often naturally lose some angle even those not experiencing ED.
The main point remains, however, that an erect penis, no matter how un-round or laser-straight is capable of coitus whereas a softly erect penis, no matter how pleasing and natural-appearing it may be, is not capable of coitus.
So, do you want to LOOK good or BE good? (That question is not meant to insult men who want both or are simply concerned with appearance, so please do not take offense.) This little essay is merely meant to point out that implants have their anatomical/cosmetic limitations. Limitations that pale in comparison to their primary purpose, to enable coitus to occur.
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
In discussions, with my wife, about the small changes that may happen with my penis after an implant. She has stated that she just wants it to work. All these little details aren't important to her. In a long marriage she has seen it young to old. The final test is function. Men are worrying about the wrong shit. Get over it, get a dick that works. Everything else will fall into place.
68yo, HBP at 40, high triglycerides at 45. Phimosis at 57. Type 2 at 60. Dr. William Brant May 1, 2023 CX 21cm w/no rte's penoscrotal 6" girth @ 6 months
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 7:32 am
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
I'm happy with my appearance while inflated. I think I look very similar to how I looked before my ED when hard.
I think the big difference is how I look deflated. Before the implant, I was a grower. Now I'm a shower.
I'll echo what others have written. Now I have as close to a naturally functioning hard on as possible. That's much important to me than the differences in appearance.
I think the big difference is how I look deflated. Before the implant, I was a grower. Now I'm a shower.
I'll echo what others have written. Now I have as close to a naturally functioning hard on as possible. That's much important to me than the differences in appearance.
55; ED for 22+ years; Coloplast Titan implant on 10/26/20; Dr. Martin Gross; Happy to share my experiences in private messages
Re: How anatomically correct are implants?
Do you also get the slightly triangular shape of the erect penis, with the large bulge all along the underside of the shaft, under the two corpus cavernosas?
Same as @wolfpacker: no engorgement of the spongiousum resulting in wide, flat penis. Actually my flaccid is nice and round so if I take Viagra and get aroused, pumping less looks better. If I’m not aroused my penis looks like asparagus rather than mushroom
Implanted April 9th 2021(age 55) by Dr. Eid w/ 24 cm Titan
Activated Day 3; minimal swelling and discomfort for 3-4 weeks
Preop injection size: 17 cms length (slight press) & 15 1/2 cm girth
Post up w/max inflation: 17 cm length 14 cm girth
Activated Day 3; minimal swelling and discomfort for 3-4 weeks
Preop injection size: 17 cms length (slight press) & 15 1/2 cm girth
Post up w/max inflation: 17 cm length 14 cm girth
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ED2013, Floridaspeedo, Rodsmen and 34 guests