Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
OregonStrong
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:15 pm

Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby OregonStrong » Sat Jun 19, 2021 10:13 pm

Anybody have a good link to max inflation diameter between the two products, thinking non-implanted full rigidity diameter comparisons of the products? Have my LGX which overall I'm pleased with, but even after I inflate it as hard as I can pump, there is still some degree of give to the LGX that I wish I didn't have and just thinking about the future if I needed a change or had to whenever my current implant has worn out which one would be a better option. I want the girthiest implant I can find with the best rigidity, as have pretty good girth currently and like to maximize that.
50 yrs old. E.D. issues started around age 35, combo venous leak/testicular failure. Bilateral testicular implants for severely atrophic testes. Implanted 6/11/20 Dr. Kramer LGX 21cm + 1.

wolfpacker
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby wolfpacker » Sat Jun 19, 2021 10:28 pm

Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf
Early 30s with ED for years from penis enlargement stretching and jelqing. Implant by Dr Eid on 24 June 2021 with a Titan 24cm with +1cm RTE on one side and -1cm cut off on the other side

My journal: viewtopic.php?t=17202

oldbeek
Posts: 2481
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 1:46 pm
Location: Los Angeles area

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby oldbeek » Sun Jun 20, 2021 7:30 pm

Just for discussion sake, I was under the impression that your tunica's can not expand beyond there original length or diameter. So how is a larger diameter implant going to increase anything. AS for the study on rigidity, I cant imagine needing a more ridged dick than mine with a 700lgx. I can hang a towel on it and hurt my partner with it at max pump.
82, good health, RP 7-2017, all nerves taken , PSA 0.05, 4-18,, .07 1/19,.05 4/19, .03 11-21, .04 11-23, implanted 4-1-18, Infra-pubic, AMS lgx 15 cm with 5cm rte. Implant at USC Keck. Dr Boyd and Dr Loh Doyle 6.5 x 5, 800 AUS 7-21-20

Agfa13
Posts: 1591
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:03 pm
Location: Laurel, Maryland

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby Agfa13 » Sun Jun 20, 2021 8:01 pm

Lol...hurt your partner? Well, in my experience, pumping to max on my Titan can hurt me because if partner is not level with my dick, it hurts to play!
Ag, 58, Maryland
Document with BEFORE/after pics
AMS cx 24cm, Titan malleable, Titan Legacy on 3/2/20 (20cm/bilat 2cm RTE/ 75 cc)
Face pic on pg. 22: names and faces; dick pics on pg 7/41: Dick of day
Smaller dick, but can fuck without fail :lol: :D

OregonStrong
Posts: 380
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:15 pm

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby OregonStrong » Sun Jun 20, 2021 11:05 pm

wolfpacker wrote:Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf


Thanks. that was what I was looking for. Funny the picture on page 8 is exactly what my penis feels like it's doing when I am topping someone who is very tight with my LGX. Or when they are trying to sit on me it tends to buckle like that, hence why I was thinking of something with more rigidity.
50 yrs old. E.D. issues started around age 35, combo venous leak/testicular failure. Bilateral testicular implants for severely atrophic testes. Implanted 6/11/20 Dr. Kramer LGX 21cm + 1.

Quester
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2018 9:10 pm

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby Quester » Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:02 am

wolfpacker wrote:Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

It’s a good over all study but back to the OP’s original question of the Titan over the CX, I haven’t seen a study. Then again I haven’t really looked.

I have the CX and I haven’t noticed any buckling when pumped to max but that is with vaginal not anal. And I can hang a wet bath towel on mine.

I would be interested if there has been a study done, comparing the various models of each device.
ED 20 years, Peyroine's Disease diagnosed in 2018, at 57 years I was implanted September 3rd 2019 at the Salt Lake City VA Medical Center, AMS700 CX 21cm + 2cm RTE

wolfpacker
Posts: 1003
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby wolfpacker » Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:59 am

Quester wrote:
wolfpacker wrote:Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

It’s a good over all study but back to the OP’s original question of the Titan over the CX, I haven’t seen a study. Then again I haven’t really looked.

I have the CX and I haven’t noticed any buckling when pumped to max but that is with vaginal not anal. And I can hang a wet bath towel on mine.

I would be interested if there has been a study done, comparing the various models of each device.


The study I linked directly addresses your questions and the OP's questions: the diameter of Titan cylinders vs CX cylinders as well as rigidity (resistance to buckling) between the two devices.
Early 30s with ED for years from penis enlargement stretching and jelqing. Implant by Dr Eid on 24 June 2021 with a Titan 24cm with +1cm RTE on one side and -1cm cut off on the other side

My journal: viewtopic.php?t=17202

AST2123
Posts: 457
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 7:54 am

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby AST2123 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 4:06 pm

wolfpacker wrote:Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

Obviously, Titan is more rigid than the LGX, but I do not see the CX, which is more rigid than LGX and have bigger girth, in the comparison.
I didn't read all the study, and I am wondering if natural penis erection would be in the comparison as well.
I am asking because I see that everyone with an implant, whether LGX, CX, or Titan, states that he has a rock-hard erection. Is the extra rigidity of Titan really required?
It believe for lengths like 24, 26, and 28cm Titan is a must have. AMS have 24cm on CX only and as a special order.
Finally Bionic
52y old. RP Oct. 2017. Pills didn't work. Trimix failed after a couple of times. Have inguinal hernia repair on both sides. Implanted AMS CX, 21 cm+1 cm RTE, by Dr. Kai Li at KP, VA, Jan. 2021. New username FinallyBionic

SW0110
Posts: 648
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2018 6:15 pm
Location: Central Kentucky

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby SW0110 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 7:20 am

I had a titan. Now with ams 700.

Rock hard with both. Just under 7 inches with both. Just over 5.5 girth with both.

This is my old pre ed size. Took a while to get back there after peyronies and ed though.

My pumped up erection with both is so hard pushing it down to a 90 degree angle is uncomfortable so I rarely pump up fully for sex.

Do you know how much saline the doc put in your reservoir to make sure your cylinders are fully inflated.

When I am fully pumped, I am at a hard 1 o clock. Bulb is still rock hard full of saline. No squishiness to it at all.
18 cm plus 1 rte titan installed March 2019. Revision March 2020 by Dr. Andrew Todd, Richmond KY. He replaced the titan with an AMS 700 LGX 18 cm cylinder plus 2 rte for 20 cm total length.

MK1965
Posts: 625
Joined: Thu May 24, 2018 5:32 pm

Re: Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

Postby MK1965 » Tue Jun 22, 2021 7:39 am

I had both implants.
As SW wrote, no difference for me in hardness, no difference in girth, 1/2 longer with CX because, I was undersized with Titan.
The only difference is in comfort. AMS CX is way more comfortable for me in inflated and deflated state.
MK
IPP 9/5/18; TITAN OTR 18 +1cm RTE,Prostate Ca at 51 y/o; RARP 11/2/16, ED Post RP, Cialis, Viagra, VED,TRIMIX painful, BIMIX ineffective,lost 2+ inches of length after RP. Revision 12/2/20 by Dr Clavell, AMS 700 CX, L 21 R 21+1.5 RTE.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Rufian and 154 guests