Diameter comparisons between Titan and CX

[OregonStrong]

Anybody have a good link to max inflation diameter between the two products, thinking non-implanted full rigidity diameter comparisons of the products? Have my LGX which overall I'm pleased with, but even after I inflate it as hard as I can pump, there is still some degree of give to the LGX that I wish I didn't have and just thinking about the future if I needed a change or had to whenever my current implant has worn out which one would be a better option. I want the girthiest implant I can find with the best rigidity, as have pretty good girth currently and like to maximize that.

[wolfpacker]

Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

[oldbeek]

Just for discussion sake, I was under the impression that your tunica's can not expand beyond there original length or diameter. So how is a larger diameter implant going to increase anything. AS for the study on rigidity, I cant imagine needing a more ridged dick than mine with a 700lgx. I can hang a towel on it and hurt my partner with it at max pump.

[Agfa13]

Lol...hurt your partner? Well, in my experience, pumping to max on my Titan can hurt me because if partner is not level with my dick, it hurts to play!

[OregonStrong]

Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

Thanks. that was what I was looking for. Funny the picture on page 8 is exactly what my penis feels like it's doing when I am topping someone who is very tight with my LGX. Or when they are trying to sit on me it tends to buckle like that, hence why I was thinking of something with more rigidity.

[Quester]

Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

It’s a good over all study but back to the OP’s original question of the Titan over the CX, I haven’t seen a study. Then again I haven’t really looked.

I have the CX and I haven’t noticed any buckling when pumped to max but that is with vaginal not anal. And I can hang a wet bath towel on mine.

I would be interested if there has been a study done, comparing the various models of each device.

[wolfpacker]

Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

It’s a good over all study but back to the OP’s original question of the Titan over the CX, I haven’t seen a study. Then again I haven’t really looked.

I have the CX and I haven’t noticed any buckling when pumped to max but that is with vaginal not anal. And I can hang a wet bath towel on mine.

I would be interested if there has been a study done, comparing the various models of each device.

The study I linked directly addresses your questions and the OP's questions: the diameter of Titan cylinders vs CX cylinders as well as rigidity (resistance to buckling) between the two devices.

[AST2123]

Sounds like you want the titan then. It's major downside is that in the flacid state, it is less manageable than the AMS (doesn't get as flacid, always more like semi-erect)

Turn your head sideways and check out the table on page 13 of this study. One of the co-authors is Dr Hakky, a very popular surgeon with lots of patients on this forum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 828306.pdf

Obviously, Titan is more rigid than the LGX, but I do not see the CX, which is more rigid than LGX and have bigger girth, in the comparison.
I didn't read all the study, and I am wondering if natural penis erection would be in the comparison as well.
I am asking because I see that everyone with an implant, whether LGX, CX, or Titan, states that he has a rock-hard erection. Is the extra rigidity of Titan really required?
It believe for lengths like 24, 26, and 28cm Titan is a must have. AMS have 24cm on CX only and as a special order.

[SW0110]

I had a titan. Now with ams 700.

Rock hard with both. Just under 7 inches with both. Just over 5.5 girth with both.

This is my old pre ed size. Took a while to get back there after peyronies and ed though.

My pumped up erection with both is so hard pushing it down to a 90 degree angle is uncomfortable so I rarely pump up fully for sex.

Do you know how much saline the doc put in your reservoir to make sure your cylinders are fully inflated.

When I am fully pumped, I am at a hard 1 o clock. Bulb is still rock hard full of saline. No squishiness to it at all.

[MK1965]

I had both implants.
As SW wrote, no difference for me in hardness, no difference in girth, 1/2 longer with CX because, I was undersized with Titan.
The only difference is in comfort. AMS CX is way more comfortable for me in inflated and deflated state.
MK