merrix wrote:Lost Sheep wrote:merrix wrote:It is proven by multiple studies that a fully inflated Titan is harder than a fully inflated LGX. This is a fact.
Merrix, I would thank you if you would provide citations (or links) to those studies, please.
Here is one.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5654325/But it's quite easy to google hardness, kink, axial loading, penile implant and there will be more.
Yes, I did that. Read all I could find. The one you cite is ex-vivo. Rigidity inside a man inside a woman is the measure I am most interested in.
And not just stiffness of the implant, but also stability of the angle of the erection, a factor mentioned less often.
Yes, the uninflated Titan is stiffer than either standard AMS device. But the stiffness provided by the inflation pressure soon overwhelms that residual stiffness. In other words, if a stiffness level of an uninflated Titan is "2" and the stiffness level of an AMS is "1", and the stiffness added by the pressure of inflation adds stiffness level of "19" more, the stiffness of the INFLATED Titan would be "21" and the stiffness level of the AMS, "20", a difference of only 5%. And if the AMS could be safely inflated to a higher pressure than the Titan, the AMS could actually be stiffer in use than the Titan. Now, this is speculation. A thought-experiment which I have not found conducted in real life anywhere.
Have you? Please, I really am interested in getting to the truth of the matter.
Thank you, Merrix for your zeal in keeping Franktalk (and me) on track to the benefit of all men (and women) who would benefit from reliable knowledge rather than my speculations.