Discussion. Is it always a natural working dick than a prothesis?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:54 pm
I have just seen a message from Lost Sheep in other thread, that has made me think. I bring here in a new thread for discussion.
We all agree that for any man, a health and working dick is better than any other thing. The theme complicates when the dick stop working normally and only have erections for x minutes, with some level of hardness, and x times a week.
It is difficult to draw a line which clearly separate the point from what is better an implant. Without any doubt, a prothesis is much better than a limp dick. It is in the middle, between completely healthy dick and completely useless one. The edge is not clear.
But till now, it is OUR point of view. It would be interesting wear our partner's socks and think about it. For the partner, doesn't mind if a woman or a man.. what is better? I don't know how a gay man feels, but I do know how average woman think and feel about sex, at least, all women that I have sexually known. And I am not sure if is so clear for them that a fully functional dick is always better than a prothesys. I am not always been under ED, and in my best moments, I have get, only once in my life, have sex 7 times in a weekend. The woman who was my partner that time (I have achieved that only twice in my life, with one different woman each time, second is my current wife), got crazy about it. Very very happy. But two of them, would have been happier if I could be done more times. It is not something I suppose: both told me.
So this is the point. With a prothesis, the limit is in the partner, not in us. And for me, is much more important my partner satisfaction than mine. I could even take apart mine for satisfy her.
For our partners, I think that, even considering the totally working dick is better than a prothesis, I am not so sure that the premise is the same for a 10 minutes once a day working one, I guess they prefer the prothesis.
What do you think?
We all agree that for any man, a health and working dick is better than any other thing. The theme complicates when the dick stop working normally and only have erections for x minutes, with some level of hardness, and x times a week.
It is difficult to draw a line which clearly separate the point from what is better an implant. Without any doubt, a prothesis is much better than a limp dick. It is in the middle, between completely healthy dick and completely useless one. The edge is not clear.
But till now, it is OUR point of view. It would be interesting wear our partner's socks and think about it. For the partner, doesn't mind if a woman or a man.. what is better? I don't know how a gay man feels, but I do know how average woman think and feel about sex, at least, all women that I have sexually known. And I am not sure if is so clear for them that a fully functional dick is always better than a prothesys. I am not always been under ED, and in my best moments, I have get, only once in my life, have sex 7 times in a weekend. The woman who was my partner that time (I have achieved that only twice in my life, with one different woman each time, second is my current wife), got crazy about it. Very very happy. But two of them, would have been happier if I could be done more times. It is not something I suppose: both told me.
So this is the point. With a prothesis, the limit is in the partner, not in us. And for me, is much more important my partner satisfaction than mine. I could even take apart mine for satisfy her.
For our partners, I think that, even considering the totally working dick is better than a prothesis, I am not so sure that the premise is the same for a 10 minutes once a day working one, I guess they prefer the prothesis.
What do you think?