Hey there. First I'd like to tell you that 11 weeks is really nothing. Nothing. Believe me. I am over three years in to this journey now and what you have after 11 weeks is nowhere near your end product. Just trust me on that. Whatever you have now, good or bad, will get a lot better.
So to your question:
This is an interesting discussion from multiple perspectives. A highly debated topic, a very interesting question (the lengthening capability of the two brands), and then all us laymen telling people how things work and how useless and unknowledgeable the doctors are...
I have been away from this site for a few months, and this was the first thread that caught my attention when I for some reason logged in here to take a look.
Regarding the factual issue itself, which one does expand length better, I still think (and I say think of course, because I am no researcher or experienced doc myself), that this forume greatly overstates the LGX lengthening capacity. I spent some time a while ago trying to find research on this topic (
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=6010&start=510#p99868), and honestly, research does not support the LGX' superior dick lengthening capability. It is almost the other way around, with they study showing the largest size increases using Titans. I think it is fair to say that the LGX major benefit of its lengthening cylinders is that it shrinks your flaccid. It does not increase your erection size. Which is a good thing if you don't want a huge flaccid. And a bad thing if a huge flaccid is exactly what you DO want.
And befor smashing this statement with bro science, take a few hours and read through the research papers I link to in the post linked above, and even better, find some more studies.
Secondly, regarding people telling the world (well at least the tiny little bubble of it called Frank Talk) that experienced doctors, in this case Perito, don't know what they are talking about, judging his statements and his knowledge, correcting him and pointing out where he goes wrong - this is a phenomenom that I raise my hand and admits guilty to as well. I think perhaps my perspective has changed after being a very sporadic visitor to this forum for a year, and then not coming here at all for a few months.
When I read the posts above now it almost makes me laugh. We have guys here who seriously tell us if Perito knows or does not know how to install an implant. People who judges his statement and tell us whether he is right or wrong, and when he is wrong (in their opinion), they tell us how it really is. Quite funny if you step out of this bubble and think about it, isn't it?
Who woould you rather trust, one of the world's most experienced Implant docs or two anonymous guys on an internet forum???????
Regarding what he says, I am of course just like the two other posters here an anonymous guy on an internet forum, and my opinion is worth no more than theirs', but this is what I say:
First of all, reserach, at least the research I have found, proves him right. There is no proven advantage of the LGX in terms of increasing length more than a Titan. There is research proving Titan's better rigidity.
Secondly, my own experience supports this. I have grown my dick over 2 cm from immediately post implant and over 1 cm from PRE implant. My girth has grown some as well, but not much. I was quite girthy already though.
And Perito says that the Titan should be 'oversized', I guess he means in the way Eid did with me, and what Eid sayd was the best way to do it as well:
Sizing it so that it is straight in the fully inflated state and crinkles when flaccid.
That will actually mean there is a difference between the flaccid and erect state with a Titan as well. In my case about an inch. Some of it from glans filling with blood, but some of it from the cylinders straightening.
So listen to your doc and read what is written here with a pinch of salt.
Good luck!
