AMS LGX ?

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Bubba1956
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 6:59 pm

AMS LGX ?

Postby Bubba1956 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:44 pm

I am interested in finding out what you guys have found out about the AMS 700 lgx? pro and cons welcome
I am 62 years old. Full blown Ed for 10 years. married for 18 years. my urologist dr. Kershen. Implanted October 15,2018. AMS 700 LGX 18cm length by 12 mm diameter I live in Coleman, Mi. USA : 8-) )

Hawkman
Posts: 556
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:09 pm
Location: PA
Contact:

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby Hawkman » Sat Aug 25, 2018 3:04 pm

That would be half of the posts on the implant forum.
Prostatectomy 2004-Bimix caused Peyronies-Viagra had little effect. Active sex life with wife of 50 yrs- been dependent on a VED for 10 yrs. 22cm Titan w/Dr. Eid Aug 7th See my Implant Journal -> http://www.peyroniesforum.net/index.php/board,56.0.html

Bubba1956
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2018 6:59 pm

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby Bubba1956 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 5:01 pm

does it hold up to the advertisement of increased length by up to 25 %
I am 62 years old. Full blown Ed for 10 years. married for 18 years. my urologist dr. Kershen. Implanted October 15,2018. AMS 700 LGX 18cm length by 12 mm diameter I live in Coleman, Mi. USA : 8-) )

MyImplant
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:22 pm

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby MyImplant » Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:50 pm

The answer is complicated.

To start I think that the claim is "up to 20%". I had an LGX for 8 years and I got good growth. But how much attributed to the LGX? I grew 4 CM which was added to my new revised Titan implant. You should know that there was a study using a machine measuring tool that basically at very high pressure did expand the cylinder by 20%. More also that the Titan expands somewhat.. maybe 5 %.

But these increases are significant if the tunica allows this. So if the implant is fully sized AND the tunica is supple enough to expand then the pressure caused by the expanding LGX could produce the wanted result. If these conditions exist the the LGX makes great sense. Remember that the degree of expandability is depending on the size of the [u] expandable [b] portion. From the total lenght you must subtract the lenght of the base and any rear tip extenders. So in my case my total lenght of the LGX really had only 10 CM. Thus the max growth would be 2 CM. The Titan might be 1/2 CM.


I HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS WHOLE SUBJECT.
.
AMS 700 LGX 19 CM (15CM + 4CM RTE) Sept 2009 by Dr. Neil Baum (erect 7.25 BPL to tip Girth 5 1/4" Replaced by Dr. Hellstrum 8/17/18 with Titan 22 CM + 1 CM RTE. Now 8 1/4' BPEL side to tip, 5 7/8" girth midshaft and 7+" at base.

Larry10625

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby Larry10625 » Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:54 pm

Paulsal wrote:I am interested in finding out what you guys have found out about the AMS 700 lgx? pro and cons welcome



I have gained 1/2" in length and 3/4" in girth in the 8 months since I was implanted. I just love it. :)

Larry

MyImplant
Posts: 121
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2018 3:22 pm

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby MyImplant » Sat Aug 25, 2018 7:10 pm

The answer is complicated.

To start I think that the claim is "up to 20%". I had an LGX for 8 years and I got good growth. But how much attributed to the LGX? I grew 4 CM which was added to my new revised Titan implant. You should know that there was a study using a machine measuring tool that basically at very high pressure did expand the cylinder by 20%. More also that the Titan expands somewhat.. maybe 5 %.

But these increases are significant if the tunica allows this. So if the implant is fully sized AND the tunica is supple enough to expand then the pressure caused by the expanding LGX could produce the wanted result. If these conditions exist the the LGX makes great sense. Remember that the degree of expandability is depending on the size of the [u] expandable [b] portion. From the total lenght you must subtract the lenght of the base and any rear tip extenders. So in my case my total lenght of the LGX really had only 10 CM. Thus the max growth would be 2 CM. The Titan might be 1/2 CM.


I HAVE AN OPINION ON THIS WHOLE SUBJECT. For years I was obsessed wit a long dick. Before my implant and before my ED I was about 6" . I learned how to ride her high grinding on the clitoris and the gspot. I figured I could not reach the posterior fornix hoping to produce a vaginal orgasm. Then I started a vigorous PE program adding lenght and girth.

I mentioned all of this because I now place more importance on girth you can get around lenght issues, but it is hard to get around girth issues.

My point is t that if you have a minimal functioning lenght focus on the girth potential. A fat short dick can out perform al long thin dick'. Just an opinion

.
AMS 700 LGX 19 CM (15CM + 4CM RTE) Sept 2009 by Dr. Neil Baum (erect 7.25 BPL to tip Girth 5 1/4" Replaced by Dr. Hellstrum 8/17/18 with Titan 22 CM + 1 CM RTE. Now 8 1/4' BPEL side to tip, 5 7/8" girth midshaft and 7+" at base.

TANGERINE
Posts: 844
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:10 pm

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby TANGERINE » Sun Aug 26, 2018 3:35 pm

There is a good youtube video which was done by University of Maryland on the debate coloplast versus AMS.

There is a very important statement which was made in response to the question:
"so does the length girth explansion feature mean that you can get increased length (from AMS LGX)?" The answer was an emphateic:
"no, not at all, the length is determined by the length of implant that the surgeons chooses for you"

The link to the video is:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PPId-OVzag
"Strive to find the best surgeon--experience really matters"
(63 yo, Titan 22cm implant Feb 2017 by Dr Eid) I'm super pleased with my length/girth/implant performance. See my story at "The road to becoming a bionic male: Answers ..."

Hawkman
Posts: 556
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:09 pm
Location: PA
Contact:

Re: AMS LGX ?

Postby Hawkman » Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:34 am

I used VED and traction with special heavy duty tension springs for years prior to implant so I was confident NOTHING was going to stretch my penis longer, certainly not a couple little cylinders pushing on my soft glans for an hour a day.

Dr. Eid assured me a Titan properly sized would give me every bit as much length as an LGX. He said the LGX would provide contraction when deflated that the Titan would not provide. In other words the LGX gives a more natural flaccid feel. This is exactly what Dr. Kramer says in his video comparing the two implants. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8PPId-OVzag

My Titan takes 20 pumps just to get the folds out of the cylinders and I am inflated enough for intercourse before 20 pumps. Every one of these pumps is increasing length as the cylinders straighten or unfold. I do not think an LGX could possibly put more lateral stretch on my penis, especially when I am at 30+ pumps.
Prostatectomy 2004-Bimix caused Peyronies-Viagra had little effect. Active sex life with wife of 50 yrs- been dependent on a VED for 10 yrs. 22cm Titan w/Dr. Eid Aug 7th See my Implant Journal -> http://www.peyroniesforum.net/index.php/board,56.0.html


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 208 guests