Gt1956 wrote:1380anthony wrote:frank66665 wrote:this article dates back to 2016 you asked where are we at this plant? 6 years have passed and in the article he said within 5/10 years, we are at 6, what did he say about it?
Guess what?? I found out that Boston Scientific is the one paying for this study. Facts. Like I mentioned before, they really don't care much as long as people buy there other products. Read that, it says Boston Scientific
https://www.mddionline.com/business/som ... rects-heat
I'm not sure why you find that surprising. They're in that industry segment. It doesn't prove that their research is biased. Peer review should help keep the bias in check some. Would you feel better if a beer company or a tampon maker sponsored it? You seem to be obsessed with the idea that someone is going to make money off of you. That is just how the world works, it isn't a conspiracy.
What you see as signs that they're gouging your pocket is actually the implant makers scrambling to keep competive in a very competitive marketplace. Innovations are incremental in nature.
Cars are a good example. When I was young, getting 20 mpg was almost unheard of. Now it is almost universal. They didn't just wake up 1 day with a 20 mpg solution. It took small improvements everywhere from tires, oil piston rings aerodynamics & more.
Ultimately YOU control your medical dollars. No one is going to force you to pay for or receive an implant. That brings up another subject that might be hindering you. How are you going to pay for this perfect ED treatment? I can almost guarantee that if you talk to any medical professional like you've demonstrated here. He/she will politely show you the door.
I've done it! I don't think they will show me the door and escalate things. I proved my point, even when you enter a forum of ED or social media you get advertisements of penile implant. Is it marketing? Im not debating ok. I believe some are reading my replies in a different tone and Im not trying to provoke.
