Mlsyes wrote:Here's a link to a comparative study results between the AMS 700 CX vs Titan during a 5 year period. The relevant findings for this Peyronie's disease study was "there was no statistical significance in device survival for either brand." However, "the trend favored AMS (91% vs 87%, P > 0.05)." This study was a retrospective 2013 study (patients implanted between 2006 & 2011). In my uneducated opinion and with the numbers involved, the study shows that for all intents and purposes the device failure rates were statistically the same. I hope this helps
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23210973/
I read that report Sheep or parts of it cited and somewhere over the years and at least two similar reports that showed comparable stats on failures.
Yes agree more guys on here by a fair bit that seem to get Titan. I chose Titan based on several posts about girth, hardness and durability.
I think you guys have hit a very big question we could be asking our surgeons before surgery. Can you show me the number of implants you did by brand, model, revision etc? Then ask what are you putting in me and why you chose this specific model ipp and revision for me.
Guys could ask their surgeons for specific model history, revisions and other stats and ask all this long before surgery day. This way there is time for a two way doc patient discussion and the guy to make any implant choice changes.
