macoza wrote:ready2go wrote:Different . Not superior .
Appreciate the reply, my man. But I thought am implant was superior since it creates greater girth than a malleable. I'm confused here.For one i dont want to be cut open , over and over .it might 3 months or 3 years . who knows . and i do not want to have to pump up my dick .
I'm confused. You get cut open with a malleable also as with an implant.
As to the amount of time to get another implant after the 1st implant expires, my uro said that it takes 10 years before replacing the old implant with a new one.all that hardware inside me.. ,all that goes inside ? no thanks , not for me .
.
I thought it was just the pump and rods, nothing else, as simple as that.
.
If a patient can regain lost girth or length ,that is a benefit .
Having multiple revisions and having to pump your dick up is not superior .
The recovery operation and recovery with a malleable is "superior" compared to that of an ipp . which a full recovery can take 6 months to a year . then when it breaks ,and it will. 3 months , 2 -3 years? Toss the dice and see what number pops up . ,you have to go through all that again .
I was on a plane from india in a matter of days and only had to wait for the incision to heal for 4 weeks to back to everyday life .
The ipp has some benefits and those are negated by the negatives .
Each to their own .
i do not want to have to pump my dick up, oh excuse me for a bit, -squeak-squeak squeak . almost there ,hang on .
. ,or worry when the pump will malfunction or the tubing come off its connection ,or the cylinder spring a leak on the "superior" implant .
props to the guys who go that route, God speed for them and I wish them the best . But it's not for me . hard pass .
