Rigicon FLA10 AX vs AMS700 LGX

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
KaBoom
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2025 12:27 pm

Rigicon FLA10 AX vs AMS700 LGX

Postby KaBoom » Tue Feb 17, 2026 8:54 am

The two different urologists im speaking to about my procedure have both coincidentally suggested I go with one of these two.

They are not saying one is better than the other.

They said if money is no object, then go with the AMS because it has a longer pedigree and experience.

Money is an object though, but I dont want to save a couple bucks for an inferior product.

Whatever research I can glean, it sounds like both are very comparable products. Leaning towards the rigicon.....but curious if others here have any input on this?

User avatar
GoodWood
Posts: 1534
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:07 pm

Re: Rigicon FLA10 AX vs AMS700 LGX

Postby GoodWood » Tue Feb 17, 2026 8:57 am

The more information posted about Rigicon products here the better. We need more of it.

Because the membership of FT is disproportionately from the USA there isn’t more info about Rigicon products. They haven’t been on the market here like AMS and Coloplast.

Hopefully there are guys with that product who can shed some light on the subject.
57yo, NYC. ED started at 40. Pills, then shots for 10 years. 24cm Coloplast Titan XL w/classic pump by Dr Eid 3/25/2025. Will meet for show & tell.
Implant journal: [url] viewtopic.php?f=6&t=26225[/url]

LGXDownunder
Posts: 663
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:59 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Rigicon FLA10 AX vs AMS700 LGX

Postby LGXDownunder » Tue Feb 17, 2026 9:59 am

I considered both the AMS LGX and Rigicon Infla 10 AX. Both are available in Australia and my surgeon is experienced with both.
I was leaning very strongly towards the Rigicon, although I can no longer remember the exact reasons for my preference. They have much the same properties but the LGX is more proven. Ultimately my doc steered me to the LGX after there was an issue with dodgy connectors on the AX that had affected two of his patients. Last time I asked he said that Rigicon had addressed the problem and were now using more robust connectors, so he has gone back to implanting them again AFAIK.
71, married, Sydney Oz. PC/nerve sparing RRP Mar 22 then profound ED. Tried pills, Trimix inj, focal shockwave, VED.
Implanted Mar 6 2025 AMS 700 LGX 21cm x 12mm, no RTEs, MS pump, Penoscrotal. Back to 6.5" BPEL @ 9m.
Recovery great but have a bend.

wilsonmill
Posts: 459
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2019 9:50 am
Location: Raleigh NC

Re: Rigicon FLA10 AX vs AMS700 LGX

Postby wilsonmill » Tue Feb 17, 2026 12:50 pm

GoodWood wrote:The more information posted about Rigicon products here the better. We need more of it.

Because the membership of FT is disproportionately from the USA there isn’t more info about Rigicon products. They haven’t been on the market here like AMS and Coloplast.

Hopefully there are guys with that product who can shed some light on the subject.


Also ZSI (Zephyr Surgical Implants)..... I had only heard of them this week.
Age 65, type 1 diabetic, Married 21+ years, Titan implant 23 cm 27Feb2019, Duke Medical Hospital, Dr Lentz, failed March of 2024, revision 25Jun24 AMS700 LGX 18cm 5rte's Dr Andrew Chang associated urology Raleigh NC, Rex Hospital

KaBoom
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2025 12:27 pm

Re: Rigicon FLA10 AX vs AMS700 LGX

Postby KaBoom » Tue Feb 17, 2026 3:54 pm

Also it seems that the Rigicon Pulse is the new latest and greatest. Has a much improved pump apparently.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: amazonbot, ClaudeBot, SWorks17, YandexBot and 28 guests