Ams 700 lgx

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Flounder
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:17 pm
Location: PA

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby Flounder » Sat Jan 24, 2026 8:33 am

bigkernel wrote:I'm getting implant in a week and getting cold feet. I keep reading about woman not liking it. Does anyone have any partner feed back from this model?


Many women enjoy the experience of making their man erect during foreplay. It gives them validation of their attractiveness and a form of ownership or control of their man’s hardon. His arousal, swelling dick and degree of hardness during foreplay is interpreted as a direct reflection of desire for her. It’s can also be a significant turn-on for her.

My wife misses that part of the foreplay experience but accepts that my ED was due to PCa and had nothing to do with my desire for her. And in the end a hard dick that can last as long as she wants it to is better than a non responsive floppy one.
A-70, M-45, ED due to NS-Prostatectomy in 2012 and radiation for PCa return in 2016
Pills & injections ran their course. Implanted Nov’22 - Dr. Eid. Titan Classic 22cm, Ectopic reservoir
Only regret; Not getting the implant sooner.

cbinspok
Posts: 935
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 7:45 pm

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby cbinspok » Sat Jan 24, 2026 9:46 am

good point, yes during for play, the Lgx may react more naturally
as its shrinks down more then its counter parts. if you still get simi arousals erections that Lgx will surprise you , it won't be enough to penetrate but your partner will like, premature pumping is something we haven't talked about on these pages.
67years,fighting ed for over twenty years. A sever break, vit E, pataba, Viagra, massage Ved cilas, and I'm tired- throwing in the towel, Op for implant Mar 18, 2021 AMS LGX 18 x12 + 1 3cm RTE, gained girth and length, very glad I took the hard step.

bigkernel
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2025 4:47 pm

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby bigkernel » Sat Jan 24, 2026 1:01 pm

fucked0ne wrote:
bigkernel wrote:
fucked0ne wrote:
If you’re over 21cm, I would go with the CX instead.


Why's that? My natural erection is 7 inches when I can get one. Will 21cm be enough?


I mean, you can go with the LGX, but anything over 21cm, which you state to be, will ultimately provide you with an infirm base. I was measured at 23cm, but went in ignorantly demanding the LGX. I should’ve went with the CX.


I don't understand what a infirm base would be like? I also don't like the idea of having a 6-7 inch flacid penis.

fucked0ne
Posts: 660
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2023 7:47 pm

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby fucked0ne » Sat Jan 24, 2026 3:50 pm

bigkernel wrote:
fucked0ne wrote:
bigkernel wrote:
Why's that? My natural erection is 7 inches when I can get one. Will 21cm be enough?


I mean, you can go with the LGX, but anything over 21cm, which you state to be, will ultimately provide you with an infirm base. I was measured at 23cm, but went in ignorantly demanding the LGX. I should’ve went with the CX.


I don't understand what a infirm base would be like? I also don't like the idea of having a 6-7 inch flacid penis.


1) The erection ends up having a minor hinge effect due to the outward expansion

2) I can’t speak for the CX, but deflated, the LGX shrinks by about an inch or slightly more in both length and girth
40. Implanted July 5, 2024, AMS LGX, 21cm cylinders + 2cm RTEs. Idiopathic "hard flaccid" ED following bacterial infection. Tried pulse waves, Cialis, TRT, even spinal injections. Nada.

User avatar
Kodixx
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:32 pm

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby Kodixx » Sat Jan 24, 2026 5:28 pm

I have a CX and mine also has a difference of about an inch in length also.

- Chuck
fucked0ne wrote:2) I can’t speak for the CX, but deflated, the LGX shrinks by about an inch or slightly more in both length and girth
Feb 2025 58yo, 38 w/ greatest wife ever
AMS CX, Tenacio, Dr Broghammer (excellent) pre-op L:7", post-op @ 9 mo L: 6.5=>7.0" G: 5.5=>5.75"
2wks pain, cycling/sex @ 7wks, minor pain until 10wks, felt like 'new normal' sex @ 16wks

Buckbuff
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2024 4:43 pm

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby Buckbuff » Sat Jan 24, 2026 6:26 pm

The mrs lovs it...wants ot hard as a rock. Took her 2 months to get used to it.

LGXDownunder
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:59 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby LGXDownunder » Sat Jan 24, 2026 8:35 pm

fucked0ne wrote:
bigkernel wrote:
fucked0ne wrote:
If you’re over 21cm, I would go with the CX instead.


Why's that? My natural erection is 7 inches when I can get one. Will 21cm be enough?


I mean, you can go with the LGX, but anything over 21cm, which you state to be, will ultimately provide you with an infirm base. I was measured at 23cm, but went in ignorantly demanding the LGX. I should’ve went with the CX.

Although I'm a bit of a cheerleader for the LGX, with that information I now think you may be pushing its limits.
7 inches puts you into the upper end of the size spectrum. I max out at 6.5 inches and have the 21 cm size, which is the longest LGX cylinders available (no RTEs). Unless you have a shallow crus I'm guessing you would likely need RTEs added to be sized correctly, assuming the same size implant. I think fuckedOne is correct in that you could potentially have axial rigidity problems. Bottom line, discuss your objectives in detail with your surgeon and go with his advice.
71, married, Sydney Oz. PC/nerve sparing RRP Mar 22 then profound ED. Tried pills, Trimix inj, focal shockwave, VED.
Implanted Mar 6 2025 AMS 700 LGX 21cm x 12mm, no RTEs, MS pump, Penoscrotal. Back to 6.5" BPEL @ 9m.
Recovery great but have a bend.

bigkernel
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2025 4:47 pm

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby bigkernel » Sun Jan 25, 2026 4:44 pm

LGXDownunder wrote:
fucked0ne wrote:
bigkernel wrote:
Why's that? My natural erection is 7 inches when I can get one. Will 21cm be enough?


I mean, you can go with the LGX, but anything over 21cm, which you state to be, will ultimately provide you with an infirm base. I was measured at 23cm, but went in ignorantly demanding the LGX. I should’ve went with the CX.

Although I'm a bit of a cheerleader for the LGX, with that information I now think you may be pushing its limits.
7 inches puts you into the upper end of the size spectrum. I max out at 6.5 inches and have the 21 cm size, which is the longest LGX cylinders available (no RTEs). Unless you have a shallow crus I'm guessing you would likely need RTEs added to be sized correctly, assuming the same size implant. I think fuckedOne is correct in that you could potentially have axial rigidity problems. Bottom line, discuss your objectives in detail with your surgeon and go with his advice.


That actually makes sense when you say it like that.i have 7 inches with glands engorged that might make a difference. I'm really skinny I might actually be shallow? I will see in 4 days, I'm scheduled for surgery on the 29th. I'm really nervous.

LGXDownunder
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:59 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Ams 700 lgx

Postby LGXDownunder » Sun Jan 25, 2026 8:35 pm

bigkernel wrote:
LGXDownunder wrote:
fucked0ne wrote:
I mean, you can go with the LGX, but anything over 21cm, which you state to be, will ultimately provide you with an infirm base. I was measured at 23cm, but went in ignorantly demanding the LGX. I should’ve went with the CX.

Although I'm a bit of a cheerleader for the LGX, with that information I now think you may be pushing its limits.
7 inches puts you into the upper end of the size spectrum. I max out at 6.5 inches and have the 21 cm size, which is the longest LGX cylinders available (no RTEs). Unless you have a shallow crus I'm guessing you would likely need RTEs added to be sized correctly, assuming the same size implant. I think fuckedOne is correct in that you could potentially have axial rigidity problems. Bottom line, discuss your objectives in detail with your surgeon and go with his advice.


That actually makes sense when you say it like that.i have 7 inches with glands engorged that might make a difference. I'm really skinny I might actually be shallow? I will see in 4 days, I'm scheduled for surgery on the 29th. I'm really nervous.


Skinny guys tend to look bigger/longer because the pubic fat pad is minimal. Were you always 7 inches, or lost size from ED?
But I don't think body type can predict the actual depth of crus internally. The only way the proximal (internal) and distal (external) measurements are taken accurately is on the table in the OR when you are dilated. Those numbers added together will equal the length of the implant cylinders plus any RTEs used. But distal isn't the actual penis length, it's just from the incision point to the implant tip inside the glans.

I don't know how common shallow crus is. Most reported measurements I've read on here seem around 60%/40% external vs internal, but there is quite a bit of variation. If you actually are shallow your surgeon should take that into account when determining the best implant for you.
The concern about axial rigidity with a less firm implant is because the erect penis can be unstable, and move around more than desired during penetrative sex. That said my 21 cm LGX is rock hard when erect and doesn't budge during even the roughest PIV sex (and I'm loving it :D).
If it helps my proximal was 10 cm and distal 11 cm, which eventually equated to 6.5 inches bone pressed erect after months of cycling.

Being really nervous is normal. I was both terrified and excited at the same time. Hang in there, you will be fine mate :).
There is also plenty of support on here and many of us are happy to answer private messages as well.
Best wishes for your surgery, please let us know how it goes.
71, married, Sydney Oz. PC/nerve sparing RRP Mar 22 then profound ED. Tried pills, Trimix inj, focal shockwave, VED.
Implanted Mar 6 2025 AMS 700 LGX 21cm x 12mm, no RTEs, MS pump, Penoscrotal. Back to 6.5" BPEL @ 9m.
Recovery great but have a bend.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Bytespider, ClaudeBot, Google [Bot], TikTokSpider and 140 guests