JohnnyBorg wrote:Thanks Samba - Hakky is doing subcoronal for me.
Johnny why subcoronal? Also which type of anesthesia will he use?
JohnnyBorg wrote:Thanks Samba - Hakky is doing subcoronal for me.
SWorks17 wrote:Well, tomorrow is the big day Johnnyborg! Yay!
Congratulations and an early welcome to the Bionic Brotherhood! Resistance is Futile! as the Borg on Star Trek say Lol
You've had a tough journey to get here and I hope that after you get your MPP you'll be able to put all that brokenness in the past and start a new sexual journey.
We'll be here for you!
Your Bionic Brother in Texas
SWorks
Thisworld wrote:JohnnyBorg wrote:Thanks Samba - Hakky is doing subcoronal for me.
Johnny why subcoronal? Also which type of anesthesia will he use?
Thisworld wrote:JohnnyBorg wrote:Thanks Samba - Hakky is doing subcoronal for me.
Johnny why subcoronal? Also which type of anesthesia will he use?
sambalamba wrote:Thisworld wrote:JohnnyBorg wrote:Thanks Samba - Hakky is doing subcoronal for me.
Johnny why subcoronal? Also which type of anesthesia will he use?
Johnny, Did you discuss with him girth maintenance with a 10mm malleable rod? With IPPs folks/some doctors make a big deal that girth maintenance or even increasing girth is much easier with a Titan due to is larger girth of 21mm. I don't understand the whole mechanics of girth maintenance. Seems to be if all residual coproral tissue atrophies over time then there will be lots of girth loss with a malleable. But clearly people who have had malleables haven't had this happen to them.
JohnnyBorg wrote:
We talked a little bit about it - atrophy is something that can happen and because of the fixed diameter of the rods, this can lead to a higher potential impact on girth (whereas one of the key advantages of an IPP is the fact that it will expand to fill the corporal bodies).
However - it does seem that the rate & impact of atrophy varies from patient to patient. I feel like i read a story about a patient experiencing noticeable atrophy after just one year, and then there are other guys who feel like their malleable is just as strong years after implantation with no complaints.
Maintenance-wise - options are limited with a malleable. I think one lever I could pull would be getting into Urofill from a provider like Hakky to restore some girth. Another option would be to size up on the malleable rods in a future revision. But honestly, big picture? If it becomes a problem, I’ll likely end up just switching to an IPP. My hope is that I don’t run into this issue ever (or at least a long long time) but if I did, the inflatable is absolutely an option at that stage and I’d likely make the switch.
frank66665 wrote:Johnnyborg seems to be psychologically one step ahead of most of us, accepting the loss of size from the beginning, settling for a penis that is not large but hard, this does him credit, he will be more satisfied than others who, despite having a larger penis, are not very happy about having experienced a loss. From my point of view, seeing here on the forum the vast majority have a penis of above average size, starting from 6" and up, I have seen many brothers here with penises of 7/7.5/8", with those dimensions, in my opinion, they should absolutely opt for a malleable. Mine was a particular story but if I ever need a revision I will opt for a malleable, the problem is finding a high-volume malleable implantologist in Italy.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Bytespider, ClaudeBot, Flounder, Google [Bot], ready2go, stewie77 and 51 guests