Anyone had LGX implanted initially and then swapped it for CX or Titan?

[whatevery]

Kind of curious if anyone gone that route. I think I saw few people on the forum but can't find them now.

In any case just wondering what was your experience with both of them and reasons for going with LGX initially and then swapping it for CX or Titan.

[fucked0ne]

I asked this same question a while back, but didn’t receive any response.

[edjohn]

If you are into enlargement you would want to do this. The LGX expands the most in length out of all of them so you could gain a lot by pumping or hanging with it as long as you convince ld a surgeon to “oversize” you.

[whatevery]

That's what I was thinking... I'm pretty small, somewhere between 4 & 5" in length but apparently with pretty good skin elasticity. On the other hand I'm also pretty girthy at 5". In fact I'm girthy to the extent that not many women can take me orally which is surprising because I think I know men with larger circumference that don't have such problem. I wonder if there is something I'm missing here.

But anyway, based on this experience my thinking is that even if I lose some girth I wouldn't be all that upset. Length on the other hand I wouldn't mind going up a bit to 5.5" or 6" or something. I'm not sure if I'd want to go any farther. Neither CX nor Coloplast seem to do much for length but they both have tendency to increase girth which is not necessarily what I'm looking for.

Why do you say pumping? Would cycling help you to increase length by itself? Or not.

[2435tjklAS]

I did switch from an AMS 700 LGX from my local urologist at the end of 2021, then moved to a Titan installed by Dr. Hakky January 2025. I didn't have to switch. I did because I had recently gotten some inheritance and thought Hakky was expensive and could fix the girth I had lost from AMS, but beyond the trips to Atlanta just about everything has been covered by insurance.

I'm happy I did switch. Feel free to ask me anything about I've found, though I'm probably better with opinions than remembering facts.

If you are into enlargement you would want to do this. The LGX expands the most in length out of all of them so you could gain a lot by pumping or hanging with it as long as you convince ld a surgeon to “oversize” you.

True. The AMS did seem a lot more elastic to me. Research confirms with proper VED use before and after surgery, plus effective cycling and other exercises, you can expect an increase of length size of about 1cm, 2cm, or 3cm with AMS 700 LGX, and up to a 2cm increase in girth. My length increased about 1.9cm. My girth dropped from 5.75" to 5.5", because that's the highest girth that implant can support.

Note I said the AMS seems more elastic - that's likely because the device itself can stretch and it gives your penis a larger stretch capacity, but issues of truly gaining size are more complicated. I think that's why there's a lot of arguments over if these devices truly "make dicks bigger" or if that's somehow a lie or exaggeration. First I think clicking the one link in my Signature then cliking the next link in my Chronicles posts direct research as well as first hand photos that are far too much evidence to deny. But rather than type my "opinion," I recently learned the details from ChatGBT why men who argue implants can't anatomically increase the sizes of their penises are right, but more importantly the men who argue they can increase the stretched capacity of their dicks are right the way that matters the most.

My question:

in the past we discussed if my penile implant had truly increased the size of my penis and you first disagreed but we settled. remind me?

Where we started

I initially pushed back on the idea that a penile implant literally makes the penis anatomically larger in the sense of creating new tissue or permanently exceeding your historical maximum.

That’s because, strictly speaking, organs don’t gain new intrinsic size the way muscle hypertrophy works.

Where we landed (the agreement)

We ultimately agreed on a more precise and correct distinction:

1. Anatomical size vs. usable size

Anatomical penis length (what the organ is capable of in absolute biological terms) does not meaningfully increase beyond its lifelong potential.

Usable / functional size absolutely can increase with an implant.

2. What the implant actually does

An implant (especially something like an LGX or Titan) + cycling/VED:

Restores length lost to fibrosis, disuse, ED, aging, Peyronie’s

Allows you to reliably access your full size every time

Keeps tissues expanded during sex, not just momentarily (as with ICI or max stretch)

So while you didn’t “grow a new penis,” you ended up using a larger penis in real life than you could before the implant.

3. Why both sides were technically right

I was right in a strict anatomical / biological sense

You were right in the only sense that actually matters to men:

what size the penis is during sex, consistently, without tricks

The settled conclusion (this is the key line)

Your implant did not violate biology by creating new permanent tissue — but it absolutely increased your real-world, functional, usable penis size, which is the metric that matters.

That’s where we agreed, and it’s the most accurate framing.

Note another ending point of the elasticty of AMS 700 LGX: I think in some ways choosing this implant could be viewed as making a compromise between the benefits of having more length/girth (pretty fucking huge victory for men, amitirte?), but losing some of the firmness. It'll be more than usable, so probably firm enough.

That's what I was thinking... I'm pretty small, somewhere between 4 & 5" in length but apparently with pretty good skin elasticity. On the other hand I'm also pretty girthy at 5". In fact I'm girthy to the extent that not many women can take me orally which is surprising because I think I know men with larger circumference that don't have such problem. I wonder if there is something I'm missing here.

But anyway, based on this experience my thinking is that even if I lose some girth I wouldn't be all that upset. Length on the other hand I wouldn't mind going up a bit to 5.5" or 6" or something. I'm not sure if I'd want to go any farther. Neither CX nor Coloplast seem to do much for length but they both have tendency to increase girth which is not necessarily what I'm looking for.

Why do you say pumping? Would cycling help you to increase length by itself? Or not.

At 5" girth now you should gain some. Research says you should gain up to 3cm in length, and maybe 2cm in girth. I think that would be hard to turn down. You would want to go with Titan if you wanted a lot more rigidity but not much of a size change.

[Gringoinparadise]

I went straight to the CX, though my surgeon did offer me the LGX. For me, I wasn’t as concerned about gaining length or girth but just about maintaining them. At six weeks I’m basically back to my preoperative length and girth. I actually saw my surgeon yesterday and he said in his opinion I made the right decision with the CX. And lucky for me that he sized me well. I guess the LGX could give a little wiggle room if your surgeon happens to undersize you. But I have to wonder what the sensation is of the LGX expanding forward into the glans and if that pressure is uncomfortable. The LGX guys will have to chime in on that. But for me, I don’t have a feeling of any pressure in my glans (with my tips situated about 2/3 of the way into the glans)