Length Outcome Theory

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
edjohn
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2023 11:10 am

Length Outcome Theory

Postby edjohn » Thu Dec 25, 2025 12:19 pm

Maybe it’s too simple to call a theory, but what about this… what if the difference we see in length outcomes comes down to the difference in how much the CC wants to stretch vs how much the crus does?

If the CC is naturally pliable in an individual, he sees drastic length gains (measurable), and if the crus (i.e. anchor point of the CC) is pliable, he sees little length gain despite vigorous cycling?

Surgeons will say “most guys see .5 to 2cm gain on revision” but if the crus has been pushed deeper, this doesn’t mean they get a massively longer penis in practice.

I though of this because sometimes I notice pain in the perineum without any in the glans upon cycling… anybody experienced this?
Oct 7, 2025 - Coloplast Titan XL - Touch pump - 26cm - 0.5cm RTE with Jonathan Clavell. Still sorting out TRT; plan to try a "modified natty" approach without injections.

AntonS
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2023 3:47 pm

Re: Length Outcome Theory

Postby AntonS » Thu Dec 25, 2025 4:48 pm

edjohn wrote:Maybe it’s too simple to call a theory, but what about this… what if the difference we see in length outcomes comes down to the difference in how much the CC wants to stretch vs how much the crus does?

If the CC is naturally pliable in an individual, he sees drastic length gains (measurable), and if the crus (i.e. anchor point of the CC) is pliable, he sees little length gain despite vigorous cycling?

Surgeons will say “most guys see .5 to 2cm gain on revision” but if the crus has been pushed deeper, this doesn’t mean they get a massively longer penis in practice.

I though of this because sometimes I notice pain in the perineum without any in the glans upon cycling… anybody experienced this?

I have the same thing. It hurts at the ends of the proximal part, but there is no pain at the ends of the distal part. But for me, this is related to scars on the tunica in the distal part. How much length have you regained since you started cycling?
38, Active, athletic, marathon runner. Clipped after vein ligation. Tried embolization, wich not help. Long time choosing between CX and Titan. I ended up getting a Titan One-Touch 22 cm with a 1 cm RTE right. Before implant 6,4/6,3; after 5,8/?

edjohn
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2023 11:10 am

Re: Length Outcome Theory

Postby edjohn » Fri Dec 26, 2025 5:29 am

AntonS wrote:
edjohn wrote:Maybe it’s too simple to call a theory, but what about this… what if the difference we see in length outcomes comes down to the difference in how much the CC wants to stretch vs how much the crus does?

If the CC is naturally pliable in an individual, he sees drastic length gains (measurable), and if the crus (i.e. anchor point of the CC) is pliable, he sees little length gain despite vigorous cycling?

Surgeons will say “most guys see .5 to 2cm gain on revision” but if the crus has been pushed deeper, this doesn’t mean they get a massively longer penis in practice.

I though of this because sometimes I notice pain in the perineum without any in the glans upon cycling… anybody experienced this?

I have the same thing. It hurts at the ends of the proximal part, but there is no pain at the ends of the distal part. But for me, this is related to scars on the tunica in the distal part. How much length have you regained since you started cycling?


I didn’t lose anything from surgery but if I am gaining it’s not fast. I have only really cycled a few weeks though. Clavell likes us to start later.

When you say scars in the distal part do you mean you were injecting close to the glans and developed built in “pads” essentially?
Oct 7, 2025 - Coloplast Titan XL - Touch pump - 26cm - 0.5cm RTE with Jonathan Clavell. Still sorting out TRT; plan to try a "modified natty" approach without injections.

prguy3
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2025 6:59 pm

Re: Length Outcome Theory

Postby prguy3 » Fri Dec 26, 2025 11:15 am

edjohn wrote:
AntonS wrote:
edjohn wrote:Maybe it’s too simple to call a theory, but what about this… what if the difference we see in length outcomes comes down to the difference in how much the CC wants to stretch vs how much the crus does?

If the CC is naturally pliable in an individual, he sees drastic length gains (measurable), and if the crus (i.e. anchor point of the CC) is pliable, he sees little length gain despite vigorous cycling?

Surgeons will say “most guys see .5 to 2cm gain on revision” but if the crus has been pushed deeper, this doesn’t mean they get a massively longer penis in practice.

I though of this because sometimes I notice pain in the perineum without any in the glans upon cycling… anybody experienced this?

I have the same thing. It hurts at the ends of the proximal part, but there is no pain at the ends of the distal part. But for me, this is related to scars on the tunica in the distal part. How much length have you regained since you started cycling?


I didn’t lose anything from surgery but if I am gaining it’s not fast. I have only really cycled a few weeks though. Clavell likes us to start later.

When you say scars in the distal part do you mean you were injecting close to the glans and developed built in “pads” essentially?



You have a 26cm implant. The longest for Coloplast is 28cm. You mention you are back to original size. Honest question: are you aspiring for longer? In your shoes, I would not want any longer. Longer cylinder means requiring more fluid for your reservoir (which is already close to maxing out) and theoretical earlier failure. In your situation, I would be grateful for my huge (pun intended) win and live my life stress free. Congrats on your successful outcome, brother!
41 yo ED for several years. Coloplast 22 (trimmed 0.5cm), no RTE. Classic on 5/28/25. Dr. Clavell.


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alans4570, body2body, ClaudeBot, Delaware Husband, DotBot, Google [Bot], Gt1956 and 32 guests