Third Surgery in 6 Months

[Jsmith194589]

I'm in the waiting room for my third surgery in six months. This revision will hopefully address the tubing that's bunched up beneath the left side of my shaft. I'm hoping this shorter surgery won't trigger an infection or additional size loss - if it did, I honestly don't know if I could bring myself to be intimate again.

After my first surgery, I lost roughly an inch in length. The panic from that loss drove me to get a revision three months later, upgrading to a length-expanding model. In hindsight, this may have been premature. Despite the longer cylinders and length-expansion, I've experienced what appears to be another inch of length loss plus significant girth reduction - enough that I've avoided intimacy entirely since.

I suspect the culprit is cumulative scar tissue from multiple procedures. I'm no expert, but I have a theory: men who maintain their size through multiple revisions may have been "showers" originally - their erect size didn't depend heavily on tunica expansion. For "growers" like myself, who relied on significant tunica stretching for erections, each surgery seems to generate scar tissue that limits that expansion capacity, resulting in progressively smaller erect dimensions.

Pray for me.

[duke_cicero]

I'm in the waiting room for my third surgery in six months. This revision will hopefully address the tubing that's bunched up beneath the left side of my shaft. I'm hoping this shorter surgery won't trigger an infection or additional size loss - if it did, I honestly don't know if I could bring myself to be intimate again.

After my first surgery, I lost roughly an inch in length. The panic from that loss drove me to get a revision three months later, upgrading to a length-expanding model. In hindsight, this may have been premature. Despite the longer cylinders and length-expansion, I've experienced what appears to be another inch of length loss plus significant girth reduction - enough that I've avoided intimacy entirely since.

I suspect the culprit is cumulative scar tissue from multiple procedures. I'm no expert, but I have a theory: men who maintain their size through multiple revisions may have been "showers" originally - their erect size didn't depend heavily on tunica expansion. For "growers" like myself, who relied on significant tunica stretching for erections, each surgery seems to generate scar tissue that limits that expansion capacity, resulting in progressively smaller erect dimensions.

Pray for me.

Thinking of you, my friend, and wishing you the very best luck in your next procedure. I think it's worth mentioning briefly here what a lot of people are likely to say after me — which is that your penis has undergone a lot of trauma, and that it takes a long, long time (often a year) for your original length and girth to be restored. Penile tissue is very "expensive" biologically. These things take time.

Please let us know how you're doing.