Does Dr. Kramer implants LGX and Coloplast, or is it CX only?

[whatevery]

It seems like all of Dr. Andrew Kramer's patients that I see on this forum were implanted a CX. Am I getting the wrong impression that CX is the only thing that he implants?

[Discovernew]

Here's Kramer's youtube channel.

https://www.youtube.com/@DrAndrewKramer/videos

I went through a few of his videos and the ones i saw seem to be AMS like you said. Some doctors do have exclusive agreements with certain brands. But you could reach out to his office and ask.

Edit: I just clicked on this video and he is installing a Titan here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coKtnvFrH2s

[Jage64]

It may be that he's not a fan of the LGX specifically. There are some docs who feel that the LGX is a bit of a gimmick, appealing only to the male desire to have an implant also grow in length.

What is perfectly clear is that your anatomy is your anatomy. If an implant actually extended in length beyond what God gave you, there would be catastrophic results. Therefore, an implanted LGX that claims to also expand in length can and should only be as long when inflated as any other properly sized implant. The length difference would be only be in effect when flaccid, and for that few mm of smaller flaccid you get a product that has been proven to be not as stiff, hard or axially robust.

Notice no other manufacturer has spent the R&D dollars to compete with the LGX or feel the need to make competing claims.

[tomas1]

That's basically true, but if the surgeon is mildly aggressive with sizing, You can get some gain in length. I got an easy 1/4" gain; possibly a bit more depending on the amount of bone press.

[Discovernew]

It may be that he's not a fan of the LGX specifically. There are some docs who feel that the LGX is a bit of a gimmick, appealing only to the male desire to have an implant also grow in length.

What is perfectly clear is that your anatomy is your anatomy. If an implant actually extended in length beyond what God gave you, there would be catastrophic results. Therefore, an implanted LGX that claims to also expand in length can and should only be as long when inflated as any other properly sized implant. The length difference would be only be in effect when flaccid, and for that few mm of smaller flaccid you get a product that has been proven to be not as stiff, hard or axially robust.

Notice no other manufacturer has spent the R&D dollars to compete with the LGX or feel the need to make competing claims.

Unfortunately a few things here are not true.

1- Rigicon has a competitor to the LGX and its a product that was recently launched and not even approved in USA (trials starting next year).

2- The sizing of LGX does not mean they undersize you on purpose to allow space for the LGX to grow to the same length as a non expandable one. They put the LGX on the same size as they measure, and the LGX later expands up to 3cm more. In the case of rigicon even more. A 24cm rigicon AX expands to 30cm (per their official documents). But this will be installed on measured a 24cm penis, not a 30cm penis. I asked about this to several different doctors and they confirmed about the sizing.

Anyway this is a long discussion that was had many times in the forum before.

[fucked0ne]

I had Kramer and received an LGX. I had an excellent experience with him and would recommend him. He’ll implant whatever you want.

I have my complaints with the LGX, but this has to do with the device—not the surgeon.

[LGXDownunder]

It may be that he's not a fan of the LGX specifically. There are some docs who feel that the LGX is a bit of a gimmick, appealing only to the male desire to have an implant also grow in length.

What is perfectly clear is that your anatomy is your anatomy. If an implant actually extended in length beyond what God gave you, there would be catastrophic results. Therefore, an implanted LGX that claims to also expand in length can and should only be as long when inflated as any other properly sized implant. The length difference would be only be in effect when flaccid, and for that few mm of smaller flaccid you get a product that has been proven to be not as stiff, hard or axially robust.

Notice no other manufacturer has spent the R&D dollars to compete with the LGX or feel the need to make competing claims.

Unfortunately a few things here are not true.

1- Rigicon has a competitor to the LGX and its a product that was recently launched and not even approved in USA (trials starting next year).

2- The sizing of LGX does not mean they undersize you on purpose to allow space for the LGX to grow to the same length as a non expandable one. They put the LGX on the same size as they measure, and the LGX later expands up to 3cm more. In the case of rigicon even more. A 24cm rigicon AX expands to 30cm (per their official documents). But this will be installed on measured a 24cm penis, not a 30cm penis. I asked about this to several different doctors and they confirmed about the sizing.

Anyway this is a long discussion that was had many times in the forum before.

I agree with Discovernew, this is misleading in my opinion. As I understand it the LGX is very popular and one the the top three implants worldwide. Yes there are some complaints with it, usually relating to stability or hardness. But it seems to affect mainly those with larger penises, although it could also be an issue for anyone with a relatively shallow crus. In that case perhaps either an AMS CX or Coloplast Titan could be better choices, but always be guided by your own surgeon. For those of us with average internal and external dimensions the LGX works a treat in my own experience to date. I am as hard as a rock when fully pumped, in fact after 9 months of fairly intensive cycling, sex etc I am now sometimes finding it too hard. I have no problems whatsoever with axial rigidity. My erect dick stays put no matter how aggressive the sex is. I am also back to my pre ED length of 6.5 inches BP. Girth has recovered as well but I didn't measure it accurately pre op. Regardless, I'm continuing to cycle frequently hoping to squeeze out a few more millimetres. I'm aware that no implant can make you bigger then you ever were, but I think the LGX can help to recover original size. I believe that the expansion feature works, but I agree that it can only get you to the limits of your own tunica, even if the actual cylinders have the capacity to expand further. I really don't understand the comment about a smaller flaccid. I have never been bigger in my life and now very much in the "shower" category post op. Most other guys seem to report the same regardless of implant type.

Also the Rigicon Infla 10 AX is basically a direct competitor of the AMS LGX, with essentially the same expansion properties. It has been available in Australia and other parts of the world for some time. I was originally offered a choice between those two options. Yes it is not yet available in the USA, but as Discover mentioned clinical trials are imminent, and I know that some Aussie patients are already participating, with the data feeding into the FDA process.