principles, impressive, thank you.
- Chuck
The answer was in our signatures all along
-
Kodixx
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:32 pm
Re: The answer was in our signatures all along
Feb 2025 58yo, 38 with greatest wife ever
AMS CX, Tenacio, Dr Broghammer (excellent) pre-op L:7", post-op @ 9 mo L: 6.5=>7.0" G: 5.5=>5.75"
2wks pain, cycling-sex @ 7wks, minor discomfort @ 10wks, felt like 'new normal' @ 16wks
AMS CX, Tenacio, Dr Broghammer (excellent) pre-op L:7", post-op @ 9 mo L: 6.5=>7.0" G: 5.5=>5.75"
2wks pain, cycling-sex @ 7wks, minor discomfort @ 10wks, felt like 'new normal' @ 16wks
-
principles
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2020 5:48 am
Re: The answer was in our signatures all along
Thanks to everyone for the incredibly positive reception.
I really appreciate all the thoughtful comments and support. I just wrapped my latest procedure and I'm still in early recovery (day 0), so apologies if I've missedany questions.
This project was mostly self-motivated, if I'm being frank. I've always believed that rational decision-making has to be grounded in data, and the hardest part is always finding it and curating it properly. Data that's actually useful for patient counseling is often sparse and not readily available, and this was step one in that direciton.
The results were actually not what I initially expected as I've previously mentioned. I have some more work along the same lines that I think could be interesting, but it still needs cleaning up and validating before I share it. For now, I'm going to take it easy and recover, and I'll eventually dig back into it when I'm able.
Thanks again to everyone whose signature data made this possible!
I really appreciate all the thoughtful comments and support. I just wrapped my latest procedure and I'm still in early recovery (day 0), so apologies if I've missedany questions.
This project was mostly self-motivated, if I'm being frank. I've always believed that rational decision-making has to be grounded in data, and the hardest part is always finding it and curating it properly. Data that's actually useful for patient counseling is often sparse and not readily available, and this was step one in that direciton.
The results were actually not what I initially expected as I've previously mentioned. I have some more work along the same lines that I think could be interesting, but it still needs cleaning up and validating before I share it. For now, I'm going to take it easy and recover, and I'll eventually dig back into it when I'm able.
Thanks again to everyone whose signature data made this possible!
Code: Select all
Healthy 33y
Initial: 08/20
Latest: 11/25
TTR: Time-to-Revision (months)
Device TTR Reason
1. Titan 22+3 26 Tub. fail
2. Titan 24+2 2 Infected
3. Tactra 23/13 7 MP to IP
4. Titan 20+3 27 Tub. fail
5. Titan 24+1/24 -- OngoingWho is online
Users browsing this forum: amazonbot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, Mgons1173 and 47 guests
