AMS CX vs LGX

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
LGXDownunder
Posts: 504
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:59 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: AMS CX vs LGX

Postby LGXDownunder » Tue Nov 18, 2025 9:11 pm

KaBoom wrote:
LGXDownunder wrote:CX can expand in girth only but is more rigid and potentially more stable for longer/larger penises.

LGX can expand in both length and girth but is less rigid. Suits many average sized penises.



So is the CX basically more like a malleable Implant that just inflates in girth?

Im definitely a grower, so I think the LGX would have to be my way to go. Im smaller than average flaccid, but probably bigger when erect.

How much less rigid is the LGX......is there a sensation dip for him and/or her?

No, the properties of a malleable are different to an IPP. You just bend them into an erect position and vice versa.
There is no pumping involved and implant girth is a fixed size. They are effectively always at their full erect length even when bent flaccid.

My LGX is rock hard for sex if I want it that way. I have full control over how hard I pump it. Some find the CX better for that.
Sensation can change according to how hard I pump it. All IPPs are the same in that way.
The differences between brands, models etc are more to do with best fit for variations in different penises, plus things like different pumps, reservoirs, tubing, connectors and the relative reliability of those things. Not that much different to buying a car, and personal preferences come into it.
71, married, Sydney Oz. PC & nerve sparing RRP Mar 22, profound ED since. Tried pills, Trimix inj, focal shockwave, VED.
Finally implanted Mar 6 2025 AMS 700 LGX 21cm x 12mm, no RTEs, MS pump, Penoscrotal.
Recovery great so far but have a bend.

krh9999
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 2:52 am

Re: AMS CX vs LGX

Postby krh9999 » Tue Nov 18, 2025 9:19 pm

I have the CX at 25cm. The LGX doesn't go that long. The Dr. sizes you appropriately. The CX is inflatable just the LGX and is more parallel with the TITAN.
59 yo Gay Male. Los Angeles and Palm Springs CA. Pretty athletic professional.
Before: 8" hard. About 7ish now.
Dr. Kramer. Implanted DEC 2018 AMS CX 24 cm. Implant failure FEB 2025. Re-implanted NOV 2025: AMS CX 25 cm.

LGXDownunder
Posts: 504
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2025 7:59 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: AMS CX vs LGX

Postby LGXDownunder » Tue Nov 18, 2025 9:31 pm

krh9999 wrote:I have the CX at 25cm. The LGX doesn't go that long. The Dr. sizes you appropriately. The CX is inflatable just the LGX and is more parallel with the TITAN.

Sorry, I corrected my earlier post. Yes, 21 cm is maximum length for the LGX. There is an XL version listed for the CX with a standard cylinder length of 24 cm, which is what I was thinking of. I'm curious, do you have that with a 1 cm RTE?
71, married, Sydney Oz. PC & nerve sparing RRP Mar 22, profound ED since. Tried pills, Trimix inj, focal shockwave, VED.
Finally implanted Mar 6 2025 AMS 700 LGX 21cm x 12mm, no RTEs, MS pump, Penoscrotal.
Recovery great so far but have a bend.

User avatar
Kodixx
Posts: 712
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2025 5:32 pm

Re: AMS CX vs LGX

Postby Kodixx » Wed Nov 19, 2025 1:45 pm

Gringoinparadise, I have a CX and haven't found either of those statements (below) to be true. I'm 7" and it deflates to a very comfortable flaccid. In fact, I prefer to leave it 25-30% inflated and even then it's not "too much". Also, I've seen pics of malleables and its nothing like that. I think in the size range you're talking about you can't go wrong with either the LGX or CX. I'm sure the LGX expands more in length, but I did pick up 1/2" in length over time.

I also have the Tenacio pump. Pumps up fast, easy to deflate, works very reliably. I kind of freaked out when I found it was on the recall list -- but then found out that only a very very small number of pumps, on that small list, were affected by an early assembly defect. Mine wasn't. My only complaint was that the pump bulb was pretty stiff during the first week or so of cycling -- then softened up.

- Chuck
Gringoinparadise wrote:I guess my concerns about the CX are that it turns you into too much of a “shower” and that becomes a nuisance.
So is the CX basically more like a malleable Implant that just inflates in girth?
Feb 2025 58yo, 38 with greatest wife ever
AMS CX, Tenacio, Dr Broghammer (excellent) pre-op L:7", post-op @ 9 mo L: 6.5=>7.0" G: 5.5=>5.75"
2wks pain, cycling-sex @ 7wks, minor discomfort @ 10wks, felt like 'new normal' @ 16wks


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 39 guests