Attached: 2025 October FDA Received TITAN Adverse Events
Total Events = 145
Mechanical = 101 (70%)
Summary of Titan mechanical adverse events:
N = 101
N with Event Date and Mfg Date = 81
Estimated Time to Event = (Event Date - Mfg Date – 1)
Assumption: 1 year of shelf life
Min – 5 months
Max – 17 yrs (Congratulations!! 49 year old from the US)
Mean – 6 yrs
Median – 5.5 yrs
Tubing (dominant failure domain)
• Failure modes named in the texts. Leak/leakage, fracture/break/breakage, tear, crack, fray, stretch-and-tear, complete separation, “connection came apart,” and “short” reservoir tubing.
• Locations explicitly called out. Near/above the pump; pump-to-cylinder runs (left or right side referenced in places); at the cylinder exit/base; next to the reservoir valve; pump–reservoir junction; reservoir tubing; “black tubing from cylinders.”
• Clinical/diagnostic presentation linked to tubing language. Device no longer inflates; system found empty by ultrasound/MRI; “loss of fluid” with free fluid reported in the scrotum; de-pressurized system causing the pump to feel mechanically locked; imaging or intra-op notes confirming broken/separated junctions.
• Explicit precipitating factors present in file. Patient traction (“yanking on the pump”) followed by break; tubing described as stretched before tearing; tubing length described as short at reservoir; separation at pump–reservoir connections noted intra-op.
• Operative actions described. Frequent full system exchange; multiple notes of non-returned product, limiting post-hoc analysis.
Cylinder
• Failure modes named. Cylinder aneurysm/bulge; cylinder leak not attributed to tubing; generalized “cylinder failure”; cylinders stuck inflated.
• Iatrogenic/handling events explicitly stated. Distal tip tear from deployment needles and suture traction during a virgin implant; distal puncture leak discovered after removal.
• Clinical/diagnostic presentation. Failure to inflate despite pump activation; stuck-inflation state; imaging sometimes nonspecific beyond an empty system; intra-op visualization of distal leak or aneurysm.
Pump
• Failure modes named. Pump malfunction (unspecified), pump fracture, housing “hole,” pump blocked, pump stiff/hard to compress, pump “stuck,” pump “losing fluid.”
• Systemic confounders present in file. Several pump complaints are tied to an empty/deflated system or upstream leak, with the pump then feeling nonfunctional or “locked.”
• Operative patterns. Pump exchanged alone or with cylinders while reservoir retained in some revisions; entire system exchanged in others.
Reservoir
• Issues explicitly mentioned. Unspecified reservoir malfunction; imaging reports of an apparently empty retropubic reservoir; a clinical impression of reservoir rupture later associated with a tubing fracture on that side; broken reservoir tubing with note that tubing length was short; partial separation of pump–reservoir connections (counted as tubing).
• Functional phenomena. Intermittent auto-inflation reported by the patient; device otherwise remains implanted in that account.
Other / Unlocalized in scope
• Unspecified device states. “Not working,” “stopped working,” “unknown malfunction,” or “mechanical failure” with no localization; device unable to inflate with no further detail; device not pumping properly; replacement of a prior device for unspecified reasons.
How failures present in the file
• Patient-level signals. Inability to inflate and absence of erection; sensation of free fluid; intermittent spontaneous inflation.
• Imaging/exam signals. Ultrasound/MRI showing an empty system or reservoir; CT used in at least one workup; clinical exam labeling a stuck or hard pump.
• Intra-op findings. Disconnected junctions at pump–reservoir; breaks along pump-to-cylinder runs; tears or cracks near junctions; distal cylinder wall defects or aneurysm; explicit confirmation of tubing separation or fracture near key interfaces.
Summary of Titan biological adverse events
Erosion / Extrusion
• Suspected extrusion with mechanical buckling: Implant on the left side folded onto itself and would not re-straighten; device explanted and replaced.
• Prior device removed for erosion with staged reimplantation: Initial inflatable system removed for erosion; later management used malleable components on one side and then the other.
• Reservoir extrusion from malposition: Reservoir functioning but in a poor anatomical position that led to extrusion; reservoir explanted and replaced.
• General device erosion: Device explanted and replaced for erosion without further anatomical detail.
• Erosion with intracorporal crossover: Device removed for erosion/crossover—suggesting breach of the intercavernous septum with component migration.
• Pending erosion (skin compromise risk): Device removed for impending erosion; separate case noted impending erosion through the scrotal skin.
• Unilateral cylinder erosion with staged management: One cylinder removed for erosion first; the remaining hardware removed and replaced later.
Infection
• Device infections leading to explantation: Multiple reports of explantation for infection, often with immediate conversion to malleable prostheses; in one case the device was not replaced at the same sitting.
• Early postoperative infection with intact mechanics: Primary implant later presented with infection despite normal mechanical function at explant; reservoir had been placed submuscularly and an antiseptic dip solution was used intraoperatively.
• Historical infection with delayed reimplantation: Device removed due to infection “a few years” prior, with subsequent malleable reimplantation at a later date.
• Literature context (from the abstract included): A multicenter, randomized non-inferiority trial reported that low-concentration chlorhexidine irrigation was not inferior to combined antibiotic irrigation for primary implantation with respect to infection prevention, with additional notes on ease of use and cost; both major manufacturers’ systems were represented.
Hematoma
• Postoperative hematoma requiring conversion: Device explanted and replaced with a malleable due to hematoma—indicates significant postoperative bleeding within the prosthesis field necessitating hardware exchange.
Pain + Discomfort
• Penile pain with device malfunction: Explantation attributed to penile pain associated with malfunction (no additional anatomical specifics provided).
• Progressive tubing discomfort: Long-term device revised when tubing became uncomfortable; narrative also acknowledges that mechanical wear, user factors, or malfunction can necessitate replacement over time.
Wound Dehiscence
• Corporotomy dehiscence with component bulging: The corporotomy opened and a cylinder was seen bulging outward; the cylinder was repositioned—consistent with fascial dehiscence at the corporal incision that threatened exposure/extrusion.
Notes from the manufacturer narratives
• Several explantations involved complete system replacement; others targeted specific components (cylinders, reservoir) depending on the biological issue (erosion, infection, hematoma) and intraoperative findings.
References:
-Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Database https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/ ... search.CFM
-AI tools for parsing event summaries
2025 October FDA Received TITAN Adverse Events
-
lasthope2.0
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 1:23 pm
2025 October FDA Received TITAN Adverse Events
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
40, 2024 - Coloplast Genesis malleable 22cm-13mm with 1cm RTE. Subcoronal. Considering an IPP.
-
lasthope2.0
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2025 1:23 pm
Re: 2025 October FDA Received TITAN Adverse Events
Attaching an executive summary of October 2025 FDA submissions for Coloplast Titan.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
40, 2024 - Coloplast Genesis malleable 22cm-13mm with 1cm RTE. Subcoronal. Considering an IPP.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: amazonbot, ClaudeBot, dan_bionic, Headair123, Irish Lad 34, LGXDownunder and 80 guests
