AMS CX vs LGX

[Gringoinparadise]

Hey gentlemen, just looking for some input on experiences with the AMS CX and LGX implants. I’m scheduled for my surgery in about two weeks and am deciding between the two models. From what I’ve read and watched, the LGX’s lengthening claims are minimal at best and there is concern about axial rigidity for longer implants (I am about 7 inches erect so would likely need the longest cylinder available of 21 cm). Also, being on the younger side (45 years old), I haven’t noticed much loss of length to this point, so as long as the CX maintains my current length I’ll be happy. I guess my concerns about the CX are that it turns you into too much of a “shower” and that becomes a nuisance. Also my surgeon seems to be pushing the LGX for some reason. As you might be able to tell, I’m leaning towards the CX right now, but I am still open to hearing others’ personal experiences that they are willing to share. Thanks!

[ElbowRoom]

All implants will make you a shower, it’s the nature of having fixed length cylinders in your penis. I have a Titan so can’t give you personal experience with AMS, but if it were me I would choose the CX.