cylinder diameter of malleable and titan and ams

[LastHope]

Greater reason, if tissue preserving technique are better to be avoided, then its even more true that Not Aroused girth (on mpp) will be pretty much like pre implant flaccid girth. Right? Maybe even less since some tissue has been destroyed

Keep in mind that pre implant flaccid is unstretched, whereas post implant flaccid is stretched.

True, but we're talking about girth, not length here.

Yes, we are talking girth. There's also radial stretch after you dilate and insert the rods.

[Thisworld]

Keep in mind that pre implant flaccid is unstretched, whereas post implant flaccid is stretched.

So it become even thinner?

[LastHope]

Keep in mind that pre implant flaccid is unstretched, whereas post implant flaccid is stretched.

So it become even thinner?

Here's a video of how malleable rod diameters are measured. You can also observe the flaccid before (unstretched) vs after (stretched).

https://youtu.be/zQbs2afVD6c?si=-zeGGF72XqHFkfi-

For the best post-op girth within the limits of the anatomy, I would highly recommend the implant that Woody has. I think he nailed it. For girth, MPPs are great if the corporal diameter measurements are 13mm or below. I know Rigi10 had 14mm available outside the US.

[JohnnyBorg]

Keep in mind that pre implant flaccid is unstretched, whereas post implant flaccid is stretched.

So it become even thinner?

Here's a video of how malleable rod diameters are measured. You can also observe the flaccid before (unstretched) vs after (stretched).

https://youtu.be/zQbs2afVD6c?si=-zeGGF72XqHFkfi-

For the best post-op girth within the limits of the anatomy, I would highly recommend the implant that Woody has. I think he nailed it. For girth, MPPs are great if the corporal diameter measurements are 13mm or below. I know Rigi10 had 14mm available outside the US.

Super cool video. The surgeon makes some excellent points about the malleable in terms of length sizing too. An MPP will likely be undersized in length by at least 1 cm (Hakky mentions he does it this way too) to mitigate risk of pain and erosion.

If a patient values maintaining or potentially even improving on their length or girth, I do believe the IPP is the better choice.

[Thisworld]

Keep in mind that pre implant flaccid is unstretched, whereas post implant flaccid is stretched.

So it become even thinner?

Here's a video of how malleable rod diameters are measured. You can also observe the flaccid before (unstretched) vs after (stretched).

https://youtu.be/zQbs2afVD6c?si=-zeGGF72XqHFkfi-

For the best post-op girth within the limits of the anatomy, I would highly recommend the implant that Woody has. I think he nailed it. For girth, MPPs are great if the corporal diameter measurements are 13mm or below. I know Rigi10 had 14mm available outside the US.

Thanks for the link. Well i haven't watched lots of mpp videos, but from this one it seems flaccid/unaroused girth defo increase a bit after rods insertion.
So i can't really understand your consideration about stretched penis girth vs unstretched. You mind elaborate more ?

[LastHope]

So it become even thinner?

Here's a video of how malleable rod diameters are measured. You can also observe the flaccid before (unstretched) vs after (stretched).

https://youtu.be/zQbs2afVD6c?si=-zeGGF72XqHFkfi-

For the best post-op girth within the limits of the anatomy, I would highly recommend the implant that Woody has. I think he nailed it. For girth, MPPs are great if the corporal diameter measurements are 13mm or below. I know Rigi10 had 14mm available outside the US.

Thanks for the link. Well i haven't watched lots of mpp videos, but from this one it seems flaccid/unaroused girth defo increase a bit after rods insertion.
So i can't really understand your consideration about stretched penis girth vs unstretched. You mind elaborate more ?

You're welcome! For example, before my surgery, cold weather would cause my penis to shrink and the shaft diameter would be way smaller. I've always been a grower regardless of external conditions.

Now, that no longer happens because silicone rods were inserted to the upper stretch limits of the tunica. The rods not only offer a constant lengthwise stretch but also a consistent radial stretch giving me a fuller flaccid girth regardless of external conditions.

[LastHope]

So it become even thinner?

Here's a video of how malleable rod diameters are measured. You can also observe the flaccid before (unstretched) vs after (stretched).

https://youtu.be/zQbs2afVD6c?si=-zeGGF72XqHFkfi-

For the best post-op girth within the limits of the anatomy, I would highly recommend the implant that Woody has. I think he nailed it. For girth, MPPs are great if the corporal diameter measurements are 13mm or below. I know Rigi10 had 14mm available outside the US.

Super cool video. The surgeon makes some excellent points about the malleable in terms of length sizing too. An MPP will likely be undersized in length by at least 1 cm (Hakky mentions he does it this way too) to mitigate risk of pain and erosion.

If a patient values maintaining or potentially even improving on their length or girth, I do believe the IPP is the better choice.

Well stated.
Dr. Wilson also discussed MPPs acting as tissue expanders (aka gradual self dilation/atrophy). If the rod in the corpora is not a finger-in-glove fit, in 8 months to 2 years, the rods will act as tissue expanders on residual erectile tissues, and the rigidity will not feel as good like the early phase post-op. TooYoung has explained this in a different thread where the MPP will be wobbly. Switching from IPP to MPP in salvage settings often has lower satisfaction scores, as the corpora are expanded well beyond the maximum diameter of 13 mm with the IPP....then, later down the line, switching to an MPP will be a downgrade not only due to cylinder girth reduction but also in the wobbliness department. That said, we have individuals in this forum like thedriver and neisseria who are happy even after the switch.