Interesting table comparing different IPPs

[LastHope]

This table comes from a very recent article reviewing the experience so far with the Rigicon Infla 10. It answers the questions many have about the differences in diameter among the various IPPs. Some may be surprised to see that the width of the Titan implants varies for different lengths. Therefore, when you read that the Titan can expand to up to 22 mm, this only applies to implant lengths of 22 cm and above. The Infla 10 and AMS have the same deflated and inflated width at all lengths, with the AMS 700 expanding to 18 mm, and the Infla 10 expanding to 23 mm. These numbers suggest to me that for cylinder lengths up to 20 cm (21 in the case of AMS) the difference in width between the AMS and Titan is probably not very noticeable, but for longer cylinders it could be. The Infla 10 could be a suitable option for individuals who require a longer cylinder and prefer a softer feel over the Titan's harder one.

Image 7-2-25 at 10.46 AM.jpg

Heres the article: Wilson, S.K., Mulcahy, J.J., Pearce, I. et al. Dynamic inflatable penile prosthesis (DIPP) with the enhanced Rigicon Infla10® penile implant: a narrative review. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01059-w

the infla ipp ,deflated @12mm , inflated @23mm , wow . my malleable rod is 13mm so one of there cylinders is almost double both of my rods together .
thats per cylinder right ? so 46mm in total .

Fascinating! 13mm rods here too. 23mm is seriously humbling. I’m not packing serious girth or blessed with a trampoline-grade tunica, but the curious little science project inside me craves atleast 3 years leasing an IPP

[ready2go]

This table comes from a very recent article reviewing the experience so far with the Rigicon Infla 10. It answers the questions many have about the differences in diameter among the various IPPs. Some may be surprised to see that the width of the Titan implants varies for different lengths. Therefore, when you read that the Titan can expand to up to 22 mm, this only applies to implant lengths of 22 cm and above. The Infla 10 and AMS have the same deflated and inflated width at all lengths, with the AMS 700 expanding to 18 mm, and the Infla 10 expanding to 23 mm. These numbers suggest to me that for cylinder lengths up to 20 cm (21 in the case of AMS) the difference in width between the AMS and Titan is probably not very noticeable, but for longer cylinders it could be. The Infla 10 could be a suitable option for individuals who require a longer cylinder and prefer a softer feel over the Titan's harder one.

Image 7-2-25 at 10.46 AM.jpg

Heres the article: Wilson, S.K., Mulcahy, J.J., Pearce, I. et al. Dynamic inflatable penile prosthesis (DIPP) with the enhanced Rigicon Infla10® penile implant: a narrative review. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01059-w

the infla ipp ,deflated @12mm , inflated @23mm , wow . my malleable rod is 13mm so one of there cylinders is almost double both of my rods together .
thats per cylinder right ? so 46mm in total .

Fascinating! 13mm rods here too. 23mm is seriously humbling. I’m not packing serious girth or blessed with a trampoline-grade tunica, but the curious little science project inside me craves atleast 3 years leasing an IPP

that is the one positive of an ipp for me is that a patient could possibly keep or regain their pro op size . But personally, i don't want to deal with the pumping and the eventual malfunction.
What i would like to see is a malleable that could be increased in size with a permanently sealed filler later or at the time of the implant .
thats my fantasy .because i think it will never happen . oh well , a guy can dream, right ?

[dan_bionic]

the infla ipp ,deflated @12mm , inflated @23mm , wow . my malleable rod is 13mm so one of there cylinders is almost double both of my rods together .
thats per cylinder right ? so 46mm in total .

Fascinating! 13mm rods here too. 23mm is seriously humbling. I’m not packing serious girth or blessed with a trampoline-grade tunica, but the curious little science project inside me craves atleast 3 years leasing an IPP

that is the one positive of an ipp for me is that a patient could possibly keep or regain their pro op size . But personally, i don't want to deal with the pumping and the eventual malfunction.
What i would like to see is a malleable that could be increased in size with a permanently sealed filler later or at the time of the implant .
thats my fantasy .because i think it will never happen . oh well , a guy can dream, right ?

It's not your dream and fantasy, this kind of technology exists in the medical implants business, but it would still be an IPP cause you "fill" fluid into a cylinder. The kind of technology of an malleable implant is that it's completely solid and avoids any "inflateable" parts.
Dan