dan_bionic wrote:Mark1974 wrote:dan_bionic wrote:
Duke_cicero, that's exactly what happens with ED, it's a chronic condition, that get's worse and ED pills work less, cause one can't increase the dosage due to side effects, which you describe below
In cases like mine, where I got a mini stroke and when you develop an atherosclerosis, it's contraindicated to take them at all.
So all together, an implant is the best treatment for ED and in my opinion not "the last" treatment.
All the best
Dan
I'm sorry, but I disagree Dan. If the implant situation goes bad and you can't be reimplanted then you face total fibrosis of your corporal bodies. None of the other treatments have that devastating end scenario.
I think one thing that is missing in the conversation is that it is okay to be impotent. And impotence with a naturally aging penis is going to be far more comfortable than facing impotence with total fibrosis of your corporal bodies.
Mark,
you are right on the fact, that it might go bad and you end-up with revisions and so on. The percentage of failures is however very low if you make a good research and go with a high volume implanter.
And why should that be "more comfortable"?And impotence with a naturally aging penis is going to be far more comfortable than facing impotence with total fibrosis of your corporal bodies
I think you make the mistake of thinking all degrees if erectile dysfunction are the same. If your penis fills with 100% scar tissue it's going to retract inwards and the internal feeling of your penis will be uncomfortable. It's not like having maybe 10% fibrosis that causes strong ED, but the rest of your penis is soft and spongy and has life in it.