Ams logs vs cc vs Coloplast Titan

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.



Magicmike
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:52 am

Ams logs vs cc vs Coloplast Titan

Postby Magicmike » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:35 pm

Can someone explain the difference between the 3 models

Magicmike
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:52 am

Re: Ams logs vs cc vs Coloplast Titan

Postby Magicmike » Sun Jul 14, 2019 1:36 pm

Sorry that was supposed to be AMS LGX VS CX VS COLOPLAST TITAN

oldbeek
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 1:46 pm
Location: Los Angeles area

Re: Ams logs vs cc vs Coloplast Titan

Postby oldbeek » Sun Jul 14, 2019 2:28 pm

LGX expands up tp 20% so it can be installed a little short and will fill out to the proper size with cycling. I think it expands both ways up to your natural cavity size. Over sizing is a real problem and causes erosion. Surgery to fix. I think less experienced surgeons would lean to this one. Less chance of a redo. CX does not expand but is used more for Peyronies. I don't know why. Looks like Titan would be the choice for that, but there may be scar tissue and not room for the larger diameter Titan.
Both are softer material and more natural flaccid and are smaller diameter (girth). than Titan. Titan has thicker material and has more girth before installed than AMS. Some times folds and kinks when flaccid. Has more bending resistance when hard. My experience is with an LGX and after a year it still gives me pain if I MAX pump. It is trying to stretch my dick out past where its natural size was. It can get hard as a spike but is painful to do that.
83, good health, RP 7-2017, all nerves taken , PSA 0.05in 2025,, implanted 4-1-18, Infra-pubic, AMS lgx 15 cm with 5cm rte. Implant at USC Keck. Dr Boyd and Dr Loh Doyle 6.5 x 5, 800 AUS 7-21-20 at Keck


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: charlie and 20 guests