Sorry if something similar has been posted before.
I think it could be a good idea to collect data on lasting penile damage from intracavernosal injections. So here’s a poll!
This relates to fibrosis, peyronie’s, lumps, penile shorting. Anything, really! There are only two caveats: the damage must be within the penis (meaning not just on the skin), and you must have not made a full recovery from the damage.
Please select one option from answer #1, one option from answer #2, and one option from answer #3
Re-voting is allowed, so you may come back later and change your answer.
Poll: lasting damage from intracavernosal injections
-
HeavyMetalFan
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2025 5:11 am
-
HeavyMetalFan
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2025 5:11 am
Re: Poll: lasting damage from intracavernosal injections
As a side note, it may be a good idea to do vacuum therapy alongside injections (but at least a few hours apart)
My rationale is that injections can cause fibrosis, and Peyronie’s can form from fibrosis. Vacuum therapy can treat and prevent Peyronie’s through various mechanisms, some of which are anti-fibrotic.
It therefore stands that in principle vacuum therapy can prevent some complications from long-term intracavernosal injections.
My rationale is that injections can cause fibrosis, and Peyronie’s can form from fibrosis. Vacuum therapy can treat and prevent Peyronie’s through various mechanisms, some of which are anti-fibrotic.
It therefore stands that in principle vacuum therapy can prevent some complications from long-term intracavernosal injections.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, HeavyMetalFan and 34 guests
