FrankTalk.org

My wife and I have been married for over 40 years. When we were newly married I remember my penis hitting her cervix quite often. I don't remember that happening after our first child. And now since she has had a total hysterectomy including cervix that will never happen.
Do some women have shorter vaginas? Is it possible to penetrate the cervix?
I have a 7 in. length. I am sure longer guys would have this happen?

The answer to your question is yes, the depth of vagina varies in women, just like penis lengths vary in men. They have different size clits, some have protruding lips some don’t.
I think the the phrase for vaginas is “they’re all the same but different” applies.
I’ve hit the cervix before and one said it hurt, another loved it when I tapped it.

Before ED I would easily reach my wife's cervix. She said it hurt her. So I left the pumping up to her so she could get the most pleasure without being hurt.

Now after 20 years of ED and being under sized with an implant, she says I'm much smaller, length and girth. Sometimes I hate hearing the truth.

3rd-Nut wrote:My wife and I have been married for over 40 years. When we were newly married I remember my penis hitting her cervix quite often. I don't remember that happening after our first child. And now since she has had a total hysterectomy including cervix that will never happen.
Do some women have shorter vaginas? Is it possible to penetrate the cervix?
I have a 7 in. length. I am sure longer guys would have this happen?

In the past, I have reached a (20 year-old) girlfriend's cervix with my finger. I found that one to be about the the size of my glans and the opening to be about the size of my urethra and the entire structure to be rather inflexible. I seriously doubt if penetration of the cervix could be accomplished by anything larger than 1/4" in diameter to be quite painful for the woman, even with a lot of lubrication. Insertion (into the uterus via the cervix) of surgical tools or IUDs (compressed to a small size), etc is usually done with the assistance of a speculum (not conducive to romantic sex, for sure), other tools and expert technique.

Childbirth is accompanied by hormonal changes that make the cervix more flexible and elastic. Even so, dilation to allow passage of the child is usually quite a trial for the mother.

Still, tapping the cervix (gently) is supposed to stimulate something recently mentioned in the literature of sexual stimulation. It has been called "The A Spot" but the technical name is "Anterior fornix erogenous zone". Google it.

While it's still fresh in my memory.
I've only been with a few but could touch the Cervix with my fingers of all three. I am 5.5" and have touched the Cervix of all three with my Penis. Once aroused the Cervix usually pulls upward some and is not bumped as often. This also means size of penis is not much of a factor unless you are searching to hit the cervix. These women did not mind the Cervix being touched with fingers or penis but did occasionally object to forceful bumping by the penis during more ambitious thrusting. I have read about the Anterior Fornix. I understand the Fornix to be a circular ring of muscle around the Cervix and that women can enjoy this are being touched or rubbed. Anterior Fornix being upper Vaginal Canal in front of the Cervix. I think it's fun how all off these "new" "Spots" seem to be "discovered" all of a sudden and named or exploited as the new thing yet our anatomy has not changed much in known history. I think most females would agree that anything not so rough to hurt then usually can be pleasurable.

3rd-Nut wrote:My wife and I have been married for over 40 years. When we were newly married I remember my penis hitting her cervix quite often. I don't remember that happening after our first child. And now since she has had a total hysterectomy including cervix that will never happen.
Do some women have shorter vaginas? Is it possible to penetrate the cervix?
I have a 7 in. length. I am sure longer guys would have this happen?

Longer guys???? There aren't too many of those around here.

Larry

Al1962 wrote:I think it's fun how all off these "new" "Spots" seem to be "discovered" all of a sudden and named or exploited as the new thing yet our anatomy has not changed much in known history.

Not really surprising, I think. Women's sexuality has not been closely studied in Western culture and actively supressed in some others.