AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
Lost Sheep
Posts: 6144
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby Lost Sheep » Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:47 pm

alibaba wrote:I did not correctly state using the word models. I posted a link to the part numbers for only one model, the Titan. Titan OTR is another, then there is the rigid rod model. They actually have 3 models but the various combinations including lengths make for a huge inventory. You over simplify the possible inventory with your refutation of my comment.

I apologize for minimizing your point,

Note that I intended to address only infkatable implants, not the rigid rid models or AMS's two-piece inflatable. Also, it is my understanding that the OTR is simply a valve variant, not a different model.

Having said all that, I concede that the maker's reps would need more than a suitcase of inventory - more like a couple of steamer trunks, so your point is well taken. That it conflicts with what some surgeons have told me is troubling. But I am starting to expect misinformation about implants and ED in general. That is a pity. If this were a heart valve, pacemaker or knee replacement, I wonder if information would be as hard to get? Am I being cynical?

In my discouragement spills over onto you, I apologize for that, too. You do not deserve any discouragement. Indeed, your journey is a lesson in perseverance for us all.

Lost Sheep
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter

alibaba
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby alibaba » Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:51 pm

Lost Sheep wrote:
alibaba wrote:I did not correctly state using the word models. I posted a link to the part numbers for only one model, the Titan. Titan OTR is another, then there is the rigid rod model. They actually have 3 models but the various combinations including lengths make for a huge inventory. You over simplify the possible inventory with your refutation of my comment.

I apologize for minimizing your point,

Note that I intended to address only infkatable implants, not the rigid rid models or AMS's two-piece inflatable. Also, it is my understanding that the OTR is simply a valve variant, not a different model.

Having said all that, I concede that the maker's reps would need more than a suitcase of inventory - more like a couple of steamer trunks, so your point is well taken. That it conflicts with what some surgeons have told me is troubling. But I am starting to expect misinformation about implants and ED in general. That is a pity. If this were a heart valve, pacemaker or knee replacement, I wonder if information would be as hard to get? Am I being cynical?

In my discouragement spills over onto you, I apologize for that, too. You do not deserve any discouragement. Indeed, your journey is a lesson in perseverance for us all.

Lost Sheep
LGX 21cm .Milam 01/13/16. Horror; both service and surgical outcome. hated infrapubic installation. Kramer revision 03/01/17. 22cm Titan +1.5cm extender. Those who think their opinion is the only one that matters are a danger to themselves and others.

alibaba
Posts: 3027
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 8:04 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby alibaba » Fri Feb 24, 2017 1:54 pm

Lost Sheep wrote:
alibaba wrote:I did not correctly state using the word models. I posted a link to the part numbers for only one model, the Titan. Titan OTR is another, then there is the rigid rod model. They actually have 3 models but the various combinations including lengths make for a huge inventory. You over simplify the possible inventory with your refutation of my comment.

I apologize for minimizing your point,

Note that I intended to address only infkatable implants, not the rigid rid models or AMS's two-piece inflatable. Also, it is my understanding that the OTR is simply a valve variant, not a different model.

Having said all that, I concede that the maker's reps would need more than a suitcase of inventory - more like a couple of steamer trunks, so your point is well taken. That it conflicts with what some surgeons have told me is troubling. But I am starting to expect misinformation about implants and ED in general. That is a pity. If this were a heart valve, pacemaker or knee replacement, I wonder if information would be as hard to get? Am I being cynical?

In my discouragement spills over onto you, I apologize for that, too. You do not deserve any discouragement. Indeed, your journey is a lesson in perseverance for us all.

Lost Sheep



No apology needed. This $#it seems to be almost bizarre at times with the unknowns, possibilities, don't give damns, misinformation, varying surgeon skills and how our body takes it. Some days you wonder if results are like a day at a casino.
LGX 21cm .Milam 01/13/16. Horror; both service and surgical outcome. hated infrapubic installation. Kramer revision 03/01/17. 22cm Titan +1.5cm extender. Those who think their opinion is the only one that matters are a danger to themselves and others.

longdayze
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:49 am
Location: Panama City Florida

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby longdayze » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:23 pm

Has anyone had a revision and changed from the Titan to the AMX LGX, and if so which do you prefer after using both. I understand they each have different features, but I assume the best opinion would come from those who've had both implants.
SAM I AM
Had Titan 18cm + 1cm RTE on 1-5-17, blotched surgery, cylinders short. Had revision on 3-15-17 Dr. Kramer to a Titan 22 +1 RTE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiEZyTjSM2M

Sam

RichardTheFrog
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:27 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby RichardTheFrog » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:34 pm

I think the AMS is better for preserving length.

Dr. Kramer said that's what he was worried about with me and that's the kind he used.
Implanted by Dr. Andrew Kramer 2/22/17. 18 cm AMS LGX with 2 cm RTE's (total 20cm).

Activated 3/11/17. Best decision I've ever made.

longdayze
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:49 am
Location: Panama City Florida

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby longdayze » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:40 pm

Thanks Richard, how is your recovery going? I think you had your surgery this Wednesday, right? How long before you can travel and go home? Was Kramer as good as advertised? Have you saw the video of your procedure yet. Hope you have a fast recovery and are pleased with your results.
Sam
Had Titan 18cm + 1cm RTE on 1-5-17, blotched surgery, cylinders short. Had revision on 3-15-17 Dr. Kramer to a Titan 22 +1 RTE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiEZyTjSM2M

Sam

RichardTheFrog
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:27 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby RichardTheFrog » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:04 pm

longdayze wrote:Thanks Richard, how is your recovery going? I think you had your surgery this Wednesday, right? How long before you can travel and go home? Was Kramer as good as advertised? Have you saw the video of your procedure yet. Hope you have a fast recovery and are pleased with your results.
Sam


Recovery is normal. Dr. Kramer is as good as advertised. I go home tomorrow. Still slight pain, but nothing unbearable. From what I hear, activating it is the most painful thing I have left to experience. I think I'll take some advil before that appointment.

I told him I didn't want to see the video but that he could make one and put it online if he wants.
Implanted by Dr. Andrew Kramer 2/22/17. 18 cm AMS LGX with 2 cm RTE's (total 20cm).

Activated 3/11/17. Best decision I've ever made.

longdayze
Posts: 191
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:49 am
Location: Panama City Florida

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby longdayze » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:26 pm

Great to hear your healing quite fast. Activation isn't terrible as long as the scrotum has healed. Travel after only 3 days is remarkable. I just watched Kramer videos posted from this week and he said he did 7 implants on Wednesday. Have a safe trip home and report how the flight goes.
SAM I AM
Had Titan 18cm + 1cm RTE on 1-5-17, blotched surgery, cylinders short. Had revision on 3-15-17 Dr. Kramer to a Titan 22 +1 RTE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiEZyTjSM2M

Sam

RichardTheFrog
Posts: 411
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:27 pm

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby RichardTheFrog » Fri Feb 24, 2017 11:11 pm

Maybe I'll watch it later.
Implanted by Dr. Andrew Kramer 2/22/17. 18 cm AMS LGX with 2 cm RTE's (total 20cm).

Activated 3/11/17. Best decision I've ever made.

joe456
Posts: 188
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:00 pm
Location: Canada

Re: AMS LGX vs. Titan OTR

Postby joe456 » Sat Feb 25, 2017 4:46 am

Richard the Frog Looks awesome best of luck to you I get my implant June 1 this year cann' t wait.
The best of the world to you
none


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Tlink55 and 96 guests