Coloplast vs AMS

The final frontier. Deciding when, if and how.
RelievedofED1
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:50 pm

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby RelievedofED1 » Tue May 17, 2016 6:52 am

merrix wrote:
PFracture wrote:This thread has excellent information. I assumed each doctor had it's brand of preference and that was it. Like, Kramer would only do AMS and EID Coloplast.

Like it was said here so many times, this is something you want the best chances to get done right at first time, so wouldn't it be better to go through the hassle of traveling eventually having it paying off later? Because you can read here what happens if it goes bad, and it's not pretty, and given your situation is sort of touchy it would be hell later....



I think you are right. Each doctor has its brand of preference. I think the romantic idea of the doc examining all his patients with open, objective eyes and then choosing the implant which is best for each patient's anatomy etc is bullshit to be honest.
They have their idea on which is best, and they have their financial incentives to stick with their preferred brands.
Why do you guys think Kramer used to do almost only Titans, and then all of a sudden switched to almost only AMS?
Because by some weird coincidence 90% of his patients used to have an anatomy best suited to AMS, but by the same weird coincidence now 90% of his patients have anatomies better suited to AMS?
Of course not. Everybody understands that random variation doesn't work that way. There are other reasons.

So don't over estimate this 'choose the best fit to your anatomy' idea. Eid will generally put in a Titan unless his patient demands an AMS. Kramer will put in an AMS unless the patient demands a Titan. Perito won't even touch an AMS I think. No matter what. In the case of these high-volume guys, I don't think they lack the skills to do both. They just have strong incentives to stick with one brand. Either financial and/or strong conviction on which is best.
In the case of low-volume guys, they may either stick with one brand because that's all they do and lack the experience of the other brand. Or they actually do choose what they think is best for the patient because they have no financial incentive since the Implant manufacturers don't bother to financially support the docs who do 2-3 per year. On the other hand, if I can choose between a surgeon who makes a completely objective choice of implant but lack skill and experience, or a surgeon with experience and expertise but who always uses one brand, the choice falls easily on the latter...

That means a patient basically has two choices if he wants to go with a high-volume surgeon (which I think we all agree is the best idea):
1 - Let the doctor choose, i.e. use his preferred brand.
2 - Make the choice yourself. But if so, I recommend going with the doctor who uses your preferred brand. Why 'force' the doc to use a brand he doesn't really want to use?


I agree with Merrix that each doc has their brand preference so if you have a strong preference pick the surgeon who uses the brand you want. They likely get a volume purchasing discount from the one they pick and having one brand allows them to stock all sizes etc in duplicate and allows their team to be very familiar with prep etc. The high volume guys could use either and get speaking incentives etc and switch tomorrow and get the same from the other company. Like Ford and Chevy pickup owners they like one or the rep or the company just a little better and go with it until something changes. That said I have a hard time believing that anyone who hasn't had an implant or isn't a urologic surgeon would be able to figure out which brand or model is best for them by reading the personal opinions on this site. There are many many happy and sad implantees of all models and brands on this site. And many happy implantees who are too busy having sex and working to share their success over and over. Honestly unless you have an outside the two standard deviation bell curve for size or shape either brand will likely give you a penis that gets erect when you want it. And either can also disappoint if you have post op complications. The one consistent thread here is to go to a high volume surgeon if you want to lessen the chances of a defective install. Not everyone lives near a high volume or highly talked about surgeon or can travel to see one. In that case the choice is to wait til you can fix your situation until you can travel or take a slightly higher chance of dissatisfaction. And there are some relatively unknown surgeons who will be the next Dr. Eid or Kramer.

I guess my point is pick a surgeon who has good references. If they don't have good references from patients they will let you call don't use them. Period. If you get there for a consult and they or there staff have attitude run away. Period. Personality isn't an issue with a successful implant it will be a nightmare if you have complications. And while it is OK to ask about AMS versus Coloplast you should go with their choice or find another surgeon. And if you are looking for the implant to make your penis bigger get over it. It will make you hard.......and if inserted properly will make you the same size you were or close to it. Your doc should be able to stretch you and tell you your post op estimate before surgery. Remember the goal is an erect penis not your 16 year old never had impotence for years penis.

I hope those of you who have arrived at the point where you need an implant will have the success I and a majority of implantees have. It is a scary and important decision. Get all the opinions you can and then take the docs on your list for a test ride. Remember service after the sale is important.
66 year old with ED intermittently for years and consistently for the 2 years before implant. Tried everything. AMS CX 21cm+1 cm RTEs Dr Kramer 4/29/2015.
Revision 5/3/2021 AMS CX 700 21cm+2 cm RTEs.
Revision 2022 Titan XL 24 cm no RTEs.

dg_moore
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:34 am

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby dg_moore » Tue May 17, 2016 8:35 am

Well said, Dr. Bill!
Dave, 80, Maryland - Implant (Titan) 2008 by Dr. Andrew Kramer (failed Sept 2020) - never used due to a stroke that, among other things, ended my sex life.
Life is not the way it's supposed to be, it's the way it is.

PFracture

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby PFracture » Wed May 18, 2016 2:09 am

Bill, your post is very complete and I agree with most parts. But, when it comes to the conclusion I have mixed feelings about it. Because, that is indeed true for the scenario of 'I'm 55 or more years old and I had Ed for many years and now, after a lot of shrinkage and doing nothing I want my old penis size back''.

What about the scenario of ''i am 29 years old, never had Ed in my life, always had a fulfilling sex life, several partners, never had a single erection problem, and then I fractured my penis and from one day to the other my erections are soft, don't hold without masturbation and I have no sex life? '

Should my expectations be the same as you state?

RelievedofED1
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2015 1:50 pm

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby RelievedofED1 » Wed May 18, 2016 6:09 am

PFracture wrote:Bill, your post is very complete and I agree with most parts. But, when it comes to the conclusion I have mixed feelings about it. Because, that is indeed true for the scenario of 'I'm 55 or more years old and I had Ed for many years and now, after a lot of shrinkage and doing nothing I want my old penis size back''.

What about the scenario of ''i am 29 years old, never had Ed in my life, always had a fulfilling sex life, several partners, never had a single erection problem, and then I fractured my penis and from one day to the other my erections are soft, don't hold without masturbation and I have no sex life? '

Should my expectations be the same as you state?


Service after the sale applies to everyone because none of us will get a guarantee from a surgeon and it will be important to know that your doc will help you get through any result. As far as not expecting a 16 year old penis result, I think that applies to everyone because no matter what age it is likely that we all will have gone through something for a while that made our penis not work. We have had prostate surgery, nerve injury, venous leak, penis injury or psychological issues for years leading to a penis that won't get hard no matter which of the many treatments we have tried. The penis in skilled hands, IF we are a candidate to have an implant (not all are), will usually come back to the penis size stretched at the time of surgery if done by an experienced surgeon. That said I can't and won't give advice or predictions to any one person as I am not your doc or a urologic surgeon.

It sounds awful and definitely worth finding a caring and honest surgeon to give you their best advice after examining you. Their results prediction and the advice given are always based on predictions or percentages for an entire population. The results for me or you will always be personal feeling and should never make you feel like a number. I wish you well and that you find a doc that doesn't make you feel like a disease or a number. All the best.
66 year old with ED intermittently for years and consistently for the 2 years before implant. Tried everything. AMS CX 21cm+1 cm RTEs Dr Kramer 4/29/2015.
Revision 5/3/2021 AMS CX 700 21cm+2 cm RTEs.
Revision 2022 Titan XL 24 cm no RTEs.

merrix
Posts: 1188
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 1:08 am

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby merrix » Wed May 18, 2016 8:10 am

billb603 wrote:Service after the sale applies to everyone because none of us will get a guarantee from a surgeon and it will be important to know that your doc will help you get through any result.


I actually did get a guarantee from mine.
43 yo, ED forever from VL
Fit and active
Implanted December 2015
Titan XL 24 cm, no RTEs
Dr. Eid
Activated day 13
Sex after 3 weeks
Gained length and girth
So far It works perfectly
Only one advice: Find a world class surgeon

treifsnyder
Posts: 67
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 7:58 pm

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby treifsnyder » Wed May 18, 2016 10:35 pm

It's a tricky question, Andrew Kramer did mine (in Baltimore, Maryland) and at the time he recommend the AMS, most of his videos were this. I casually troll his website since it's so fun to see his weekly surgeries, lo and beyond the last month he's doing all Coloplast Titans. Don't know- things are always in flux I guess. Bottom line- a good surgeon will offer great results. Brand is so secondary, pick a good implanter first.

charlesr
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2015 11:28 pm

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby charlesr » Thu May 19, 2016 5:48 pm

This site: http://www.coloplastmenshealth.com/trea ... -implants/ indicates a "Lifetime Replacement Policy." Not exactly sure what that implies, but the darn things are expensive, and generally a lifetime warranty indicates that the manufacturer is confident in the quality of the product. I have the Titan and am very happy with it.

The quote that I feel is wonderfully stated is the one from billb603 that says: ". . . either brand will likely give you a penis that gets erect when you want it. And either can also disappoint if you have post op complications." I think that, as in automobiles, performance is key, but over time, dependability becomes more and more important. Time will tell. I would love to read results from men who have both the AMS and the Titan as far as how long they have had it prior to needing replacement.
Born 1951. Radical Robotic Prostatectomy on October 6, 2013. Bionic with Titan Touch with Bioflex Zero Degree 18cm w/ (1) rte Implant, Infrapubic, on July 13, 2015.

PFracture

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby PFracture » Thu May 19, 2016 10:35 pm

That will be difficult. So few, in the broad sense of the word had it, much less the ones that had a revision and switched...

KMeister
Posts: 446
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 5:43 pm

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby KMeister » Fri May 20, 2016 3:10 am

charlesr wrote:This site: http://www.coloplastmenshealth.com/trea ... -implants/ indicates a "Lifetime Replacement Policy." Not exactly sure what that implies, but the darn things are expensive, and generally a lifetime warranty indicates that the manufacturer is confident in the quality of the product. I have the Titan and am very happy with it.

The quote that I feel is wonderfully stated is the one from billb603 that says: ". . . either brand will likely give you a penis that gets erect when you want it. And either can also disappoint if you have post op complications." I think that, as in automobiles, performance is key, but over time, dependability becomes more and more important. Time will tell. I would love to read results from men who have both the AMS and the Titan as far as how long they have had it prior to needing replacement.

I had a Titan but one of the cylinders developed a bulge. My uro was a firm Titan man but after consulting with another specialist he told me he was going to do a revision but switch me to an AMS CX. There's been no difference in my penis size between the two. However, I find the AMS to be much more comfortable when flaccid than the Titan. I always seemed to have a dull ache with the Titan. For what it's worth...

KMeister

danny1553
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:49 pm

Re: Coloplast vs AMS

Postby danny1553 » Fri May 20, 2016 6:52 pm

KMeister wrote:My uro was a firm Titan man but after consulting with another specialist he told me he was going to do a revision but switch me to an AMS CX. There's been no difference in my penis size between the two.
KMeister


That is what I really do not understand. If comparing cylinder’s thickness between Titan and AMS it is like a pencil vs. a dry eraser marker. Yet somehow, the penis size is “the same”… :?:


Return to “Implants”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Stampede and 63 guests