FrankTalk.org

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443- ... y%20reason.

Anecdotal remarks from the implanting physicians who have experience with a variety of competitive MPPs, indicated that compared to its competitors, the best features of Rigi10™ MPP were that the supple bending capacity of its rods simplifies implantation through a smaller corporotomy and the availability of extra widths of cylinders facilitates more accurate penile girth attainment. Support for this opinion comes from (Table 3) which indicates that the size 12 mm cylinder, which is unavailable in competitive devices, was the second most used cylinder width in this Rigi10 study.

I wonder if the flaccid appearance is more like AMS or Titan.

Seems to be the best option as far as malleables go. I'm considering one myself.

The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.

What do you think about rigi10 with fillers to increase the girth and make it like a 3 piece inflatable?

Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.

Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years

thedriver wrote:

Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.

Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years

A brother made a thread about the Rigicon malleable. He was not happy at all because of concealment issues. Even after a year in On the other hand he posted a pic of his penis and it was not thin at all.
If you add "rigicon" in the search button you will come across the thread.

Flexwheeler wrote:

thedriver wrote:

Gt1956 wrote:The second most used rod is 12mm. That is less than 1/2".

The Titan is 21mm & the AMS 700 line is 18mm per cylinder. Looks to me like lots of guys are giving up either a potential 18mm of diameter if they had a Titan or 12mm if they were to get an AMS product. The smallest AMS (CXR) cylinder is 14.5mm.

Saying it differently. Two of the malleable rods (24mm) barely exceeds just one Titan (21mm) cylinder.

There has to be an error in my thinking.

Reading more on malleable and going thru this thread I was figuring the same thing, can anyone else back this up for us ? is there really that much diff ?
With that much of a diff, it is very hard to go to the malleable after having the Titan for a few years

A brother made a thread about the Rigicon malleable. He was not happy at all because of concealment issues. Even after a year in On the other hand he posted a pic of his penis and it was not thin at all.
If you add "rigicon" in the search button you will come across the thread.

The corporotomy made for a malleable is bigger, but it's possible that more residual cavernosal tissue remains because it isn't constantly being compressed by the expansion of hydraulic cylinders

He probably also had 13mm rods, but I wouldn't go beyond 11mm because of erosion issues and may even go 10. If girth kills me psychologically and makes me totally unacceptable to women I will use funds reserved for retirement to get Uro or Phallo-fill, but I hate to do it

And, yes, concealment is an issue with any malleable, even a Rigicon. But concealment is somewhat of an issue with a TItan as well

frank66665 wrote:What do you think about rigi10 with fillers to increase the girth and make it like a 3 piece inflatable?

I don't think you will get the same girth as a 3-piece, but you can definitely improve girth. You can also fill out your penis so that the rods are imperceptible to the touch

Mark1974 wrote:


And, yes, concealment is an issue with any malleable, even a Rigicon. But concealment is somewhat of an issue with a TItan as well

Yes, that's why I go for AMS IPP