CX vs LGX

Anything goes when it comes to ED.
Larry10625

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby Larry10625 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:26 pm

CTR5000 wrote:No expert here... but hoping for/expecting a 2" gain is asking a little much from an implant. (IMHO) In a study of 80 healthy males published in the September 1996 Journal of Urology an average erect penis length of 12.9 cm (5.1 in) was measured. A 2" gain would be more than 1/3 your size! I think that kind of gain would take reconstructive surgery!

Colin



I spoke to the AMS rep this morning for over an hour. He tells me that they have studies with 400 LGX implanted men. Although a 2" gain is NOT common, it has happened. What you don't know about me is in 2014 I had a phalloplasty to remove the rest of the shaft skin believed to have BXO. When reconstructed there was more skin than needed on the top and not enouth on the bottom. Dr. Brock (urology) and Dr Gan (plastics) say they believe they may have fixed the problem. My fingers, toes, arms, legs, eyes, etc. are crossed. :)

Larry

CTR5000
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:51 pm

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby CTR5000 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:38 pm

Wow, Larry! Thanks for enlightening me! Keeping everything I got crossed for you too!

Colin

Larry10625

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby Larry10625 » Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:48 pm

CTR5000 wrote:Wow, Larry! Thanks for enlightening me! Keeping everything I got crossed for you too!

Colin



Thanks Colin. :) :)

Larry

DonDon
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 5:20 pm

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby DonDon » Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:44 pm

posting.php?f=3&mode=reply&t=9243&sid=1e2455bd6e6bbff09dc7e120173025ca#pr73689

Firstly, I do respect my doctor's wishes and his experience...that's why I have a CX. Any my CX is great!!
Secondly, I did not expect 2" expansion. My original 6.25" was well documented with a scribe mark on my vacuum device. My resulting 4.5" is a little disconcerting. I just hoped an LGX would allow (over time) to get close to what I had. The CX version guarantees my 4.5" is "forever."
Finally, What I am asking is...is the LGX is truly inferior to the CX in the minds/experiences of USERS. That is all. Do my Dr's opinions stand on the facts?
Aug'15: RP NON nerve-sparing on Rt. Pills, vac pump, injections: Injections were best, about 50%. Aug'17: Penile pain and headaches. Implant: AMS CX 18 cm+2 cm. (Undersized! :x ) Asked for LGX! Ochsner Hospital, New Orleans, LA Still working great.

Lost Sheep
Posts: 6144
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2016 11:16 pm

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby Lost Sheep » Tue Dec 19, 2017 3:52 pm

DonDon wrote:http://www.franktalk.org/phpBB3/posting.php?f=3&mode=reply&t=9243&sid=1e2455bd6e6bbff09dc7e120173025ca#pr73689

Firstly, I do respect my doctor's wishes and his experience...that's why I have a CX. Any my CX is great!!
Secondly, I did not expect 2" expansion. My original 6.25" was well documented with a scribe mark on my vacuum device. My resulting 4.5" is a little disconcerting. I just hoped an LGX would allow (over time) to get close to what I had. The CX version guarantees my 4.5" is "forever."
Finally, What I am asking is...is the LGX is truly inferior to the CX in the minds/experiences of USERS. That is all. Do my Dr's opinions stand on the facts?

I ubderstand (hearsay, but uncontradicted by my observation of my own experience) that the length one can obtain inside a vacuum erecton device is about an inch longer than a natural erection and/or an erection obtained by pharmaceutical or implant assistance. Your 2" observation is not completely out of line, I think, and likely not a majorpoint of concern.
Lost Sheep
AMS LGX 18+3 Nov 6, 2017
Prostate Cancer 2023
READ OLD THREADS-ask better questions -better understand answers
Be part of your medical team
Document pre-op size-photos and written records
Pre-op VED therapy helps. Post-op is another matter

ED2013
Posts: 1231
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby ED2013 » Wed Dec 20, 2017 6:11 pm

I’ve had both. Yes, you can gain size with an lgx. On the other hand, the cx does get more rigid.

Larry10625

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby Larry10625 » Thu Dec 21, 2017 7:06 am

ED2013 wrote:I’ve had both. Yes, you can gain size with an lgx. On the other hand, the cx does get more rigid.



But it seems to me that a large majority of the guys on here are saying they only pump up to about 80% anyway because, their partners don't like it 100%... right?

Larry

ED2013
Posts: 1231
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby ED2013 » Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:33 am

Larry10625 wrote:
ED2013 wrote:I’ve had both. Yes, you can gain size with an lgx. On the other hand, the cx does get more rigid.



But it seems to me that a large majority of the guys on here are saying they only pump up to about 80% anyway because, their partners don't like it 100%... right?

Larry


Yes that’s correct. On the other hand, there are some very sexual women out there that love it pumped to the max.

Larry10625

Re: CX vs LGX

Postby Larry10625 » Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:01 am

ED2013 wrote:
Larry10625 wrote:
ED2013 wrote:I’ve had both. Yes, you can gain size with an lgx. On the other hand, the cx does get more rigid.



But it seems to me that a large majority of the guys on here are saying they only pump up to about 80% anyway because, their partners don't like it 100%... right?

Larry


Yes that’s correct. On the other hand, there are some very sexual women out there that love it pumped to the max.



Yeah, I've seen that too. I can't wait to find out what my wife thinks. ;)

Larry


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests